Pages:
Author

Topic: Strange behaviour of too many alts at once. - page 2. (Read 547 times)

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
-snip-
Here are hyperlinks to all the accounts involved for those who want to tag them. At a minimum a neutral tag is warranted(RED IMO). Curious what others think.
I've taken part to do it earlier instead of leaving icopress alone there - I think a neutral tag is worth it at this point for all those accounts.

yahoo62278 - thanks for providing hyperlink to all accounts - it took me only 4 seconds to send each tag to each account mentioned. Waiting for another same step from a different user - or two is enough?
copper member
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1250
Try Gunbot for a month go to -> https://gunbot.ph
Here are hyperlinks to all the accounts involved for those who want to tag them. At a minimum a neutral tag is warranted(RED IMO). Curious what others think.
Thank you for posting this and making it easy. I think red is definitely a good way to help others and non-members of the community when visiting this page to have warnings posted right in front of their faces. It's the easiest way to make sure that there are less people that gets scammed.
legendary
Activity: 2018
Merit: 1108
Curious what others think.

I'd definitely say red is warranted.

People using alt accounts is imo one of the most annoying things on the forum. I'm worried about cases where it's not so clear as here.
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 657
or maybe they're running a campaign on their social media groups to do just that.
the possibility is quite implausible. it's because when you look at the accounts that comment on the thread have the same habit.
almost all accounts that have been dormant for a long time then woke up and posted their first post on to support the site. if the accounts that comment there are random accounts like when you see newbie accounts registering bounty campaigns. the possibility that you mean can still be considered.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 4191
I would say that being as all these accounts are sockpuppets and being used to try and facilitate a scam, a tag is warranted on all of them. It's really a pathetic attempt to try and scam some users out of their crypto.

kn0wn
tommyv
Bas909
kingpirate
phamnhangioi
deddlinexxx
Kenworks
konovalov_88
Prophed
thewolfest
marissia
mhco12
cryptech
GrandMasterBit
karimtech
Postalgia

Here are hyperlinks to all the accounts involved for those who want to tag them. At a minimum a neutral tag is warranted(RED IMO). Curious what others think.

OldCat
valvilzgur
antarlz
cryptowarrio8i
notoriot
decello


Updated with the new shills
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 66
Don Pedro Dinero alt account
That thread should be reported to the moderators for spamming.

I've just reported it as you said. Now it's up to the moderators to decide.

If you really want to clean it up, I suggest you report such posts to the moderator. After some time, they themselves will give up this strategy.
Also, tagging such accounts is not wrong, so I encourage you to do it. Just make sure you make valid references (probably the best in this thread) in case the OP decides to delete his topic.

I already tagged OP (neutral) but I am not so sure about the other alt or related accounts. I think for this alone is not worth it. As they have had no activity since their inception, I think their intentions will be seen at the next move they make.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 541
Top Crypto Casino

I would like to read opinions from the community before, if appropriate, proceeding to leave more tags.

I think I have read about a similar case where an user got so many replies on his thread from accounts that were created the day they made all their comments and after that they all left the forum without logging into their account again and when the user was called out he claimed that they (the accounts) were owned by some of those that patronized him and after their deal he made them create an account here in Bitcointalk to give him a review.

But I’m this case I don’t think that’s what is happening here, it is obvious that those accounts are being controlled by the same user and since the main aim of this act of socket-puppet is to deceive people into believing that he has actually done anything with those accounts and therefore going into trade with him I think that calls for a neutral tag warning others against the risk of dealing with him.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 3098
I would like to read opinions from the community before, if appropriate, proceeding to leave more tags.

It is quite obvious that it is an organized bump with fake comments. It is very likely that the same person is behind all the accounts, but it does not necessarily have to be that way.
If you really want to clean it up, I suggest you report such posts to the moderator. After some time, they themselves will give up this strategy.
Also, tagging such accounts is not wrong, so I encourage you to do it. Just make sure you make valid references (probably the best in this thread) in case the OP decides to delete his topic.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 360
All those accounts are used for the same purpose and they already know that OP would post such thread that was why they started bumping the thread to lure people into their trap. Those accounts are very old and shouldn't be abused if it is bought. That is why moderators need to see what to do on this issue. Anyway it is a cheap scam and anyone that falls for it must be a greedy person who wants to reap from where he didn't sow from. It might also be that the accounts are controlled by one person who knows such a funny trick.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
I wonder how he managed to get so many accounts that were created several years ago, .

Unfortunately for us, it's quite simple. Old accounts with a zero level are sold on the Internet very cheaply, and it does not cost a lot of money and labor for scammers to buy several batches of such accounts. I looked at the history of some accounts; some accounts belong to the Russian locale, and there are also old accounts of miners as well as accounts participating in bumping services.
It would be right for moderators to destroy such accounts after the first post after hibernation. Although, as one old, respected user says, this is a fight with windmills.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 443
I wonder how he managed to get so many accounts that were created several years ago, these accounts did not strive to create more detailed replies or even leave good time differences between them and anyone can notice that their purpose is to show that the project is working well.
I think the reason for making all these posts in a short time is to prevent others to create negative replies.
Creating a flag is the best, forum members can easily know that all these replies are fake but guests may not be able to.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2581
Top Crypto Casino
That thread should be reported to the moderators for spamming. I notice that Kn0wn is treading the same path as the WreckLeague account, which has already been banned, and is likely part of a big group of throwaway alt accounts.

WreckLeague used to flood the forum with posts having the exact same content while pushing this web address:
Code:
https://bitcase.optima.org
Now, that domain is on my antivirus' blacklist, so it's likely they switched to a new domain because of this.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 557
If someone can still fallen to this type of scam, I don't have any words to say.

The domain is already suspicious, napcis.com but when you visit the site, it's bitcase.

There's no information about the site and you can't read anything except they will force you to connect your wallet.

Sadly they accept Bitcoin, if not their thread will be moved to altcoins section where it's a place for scam sites that promise ridiculous profit.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 5937
I would like to read opinions from the community before, if appropriate, proceeding to leave more tags.
Looks to me like a classic thread bumping case, and we've seen quite a lot of of those even on altcoin board where leaving posts can't get you on the top like it's the case here.

Based on their M.O. (use of old newbie accounts) my guess is that this is the work of infamous Vitor Services that is usually responsible for this type of "marketing".
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 583
very strange behavior and also ridiculous. the Op account in the thread is also not much different from the accounts that have good comments regarding the Roulette. this looks like the Op's attempt to keep his thread alive with positive comments from his alt.

it seems whenever someone comments on the thread, it will show alt Op to comment each other and reveal themselves. or maybe they're running a campaign on their social media groups to do just that.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1491
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
Hi.

See this thread:
   
Crypto/NFT open source roulette

You can see my comment on it about too many alts praising the system which has made me leave a neutral tag on the OP for the time being. But I see that all the alts who have commented follow the same pattern, which is to have been created between 2017 and 2018, not having written a single fucking post until today, and appearing in that thread within minutes of each other to write posts promoting the service that the OP advertises, a roulette.

I would like to read opinions from the community before, if appropriate, proceeding to leave more tags.
Pages:
Jump to: