As a side effect, the Revolution-Pool lost his grant, witch is not a problem if it's for you.
But I see that in your OP edit you are grunting against people searching for interest payments grant,
witch may not be only directed at my grant-pool, but since it was the new one in the grant race...
Sorry if you felt I was targeting you . . . I wasn't. Any grant trying to get funded is competing first and foremost with the grant with the least level of support.
Your pool is certainly an interesting development. It is a bit more worrying than the large holders voting for their own grants. They'll be dealt with by currency expansion . . as long as the coin grows, they can't hope to hold onto 17% of voting rights. However they're likely to join your fund if they can't secure a grant on their own. Your enemies will soon be your allies and co-operation means that your fund is very sustainable.
All this is a lot of fun and interesting, and I hope this will induce people to vote and take part in the life of the coin, and discover this "new" way of voting and hopefully understand it.
Yes, it's creating drama and helping people to engage with and understand the voting. That's a good thing. 76% of coins are voting at least one preference - that's a really good turnout, much higher than I expected.
I happen to think interest seeking is bad for the coin . . but in the spirit of Bitcoin I expect people to act in their perceived best interests. I don't expect to persuade people to do the 'right thing', I only try to persuade them to act in their enlightened self interest, rather than their immediate self interest.