I've already found a lot of other topics with the theme of responsible gambling/gambling awareness. Please note that all of these threads are locked for further discussion. Why? A guess is signature spam. I don't know the official reason. This list is only scratching the surface based on my searches.
Because they're shit threads created solely to be shat in much like your
how long do you spend gambling thread which has probably been made half a dozen times. A better solution would be just to lock/trash that entire board instead of creating a Gambling Awareness board sub.
Look, I'm not going to comment on what you've said or the way you've said it. Feel free to drop the thread links of these duplicate threads because I searched both before and after the thread was locked and didn't find a duplicate. Unless the search functionality is not working as it should, I didn't find a duplicate.
I've already found a lot of other topics with the theme of responsible gambling/gambling awareness. Please note that all of these threads are locked for further discussion. Why? A guess is signature spam. I don't know the official reason. This list is only scratching the surface based on my searches.
Go to a Gambling help forum if you want to talk about gambling awareness of addiction or whatnot.
Gambling is endorsed to its maximum
here. The imbalance is
here. I'm not looking for a place to talk about gambling awareness or addiction. I've pointed out a flaw in the gambling board
here and I'm suggesting a solution.
Right now would you agree or disagree that topics relating to the negatives about gambling are disallowed by the technicality of assumed signature spamming?
A lot of what you said seems very well said, though just like I said to another user
1. Who exactly are you to say or know all of these things for a fact? Do you have data to support these claims? That's rhetorical.
And who are you and where is your data?
Where are your facts, where are your numbers, where is your expertise, where is your notarized and published study?
You're just like any other around here, a user with an opinion, nothing else, and that opinion of yours can be wrong, have you thought of it?
My data is the pre-existing threads. So, where is yours?
Yes I understand my opinion could be wrong just as much as yours or anyone elses could be, that is why this is a discussion and the topic title says "suggestion". Doesn't mean I'm wrong though. I've provided basis, you haven't. Awareness/statement of negatives is becoming a norm, even a requirement on casinos. I think that's enough to validate my opinion enough to talk about the idea, alongside the existing threads that are (in my opinion) fine topics and are locked for a reason that this board suggestion will resolve if implemented.
The board has never been made so whether or not the board will be a ghost town with signatures disabled or not is an unknown and always will be until it is seen in practice. Any assumptions like yours and others are mere baseless speculation.
That's why I said to test it, but we could make this speculation more interesting with a bet on the outcome!
Since this is about gambling, care to put some money where your opinion is?
What about people who keep their gambling private? I doubt many people post many of their bets in the forum to begin with. It's a wager where the outcome does not have reliable data. It'd be silly to take it.
You can't conclude that every single person who posted these threads and within them are just making up their posts to fish for merit or reach their quota. That's absurd.
I could still bet on 95% of it, and I could still win! Why do you think those topics were locked in the first place?
If you're that interested in researching topics, you could do something interesting for example.
Look at the profile of those users, and then search if in all their gambling posts, be it 10 or 1000, have they at least once mentioned some odds or god forbid a multi bet! You're going to be surprised!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Random pic from those topics, tell me what's the ratio of gambling talk to fan gossip?
The topics were locked probably because of signature spam. I'm not commenting further on that topic. It's also easy to get a screen grab and skew it to suit yourself. It's also pretty unrelated for the reason I said in the previous part of this post.
This all aside, the signature spam debate was over the moment that it was recommended for the board to have signatures disabled. Talking about what peoples motives were in the past is something that can't be determined accurately. Only the board will be able to give the answer.