Pages:
Author

Topic: Suggestion: length limitation to trust ratings - page 3. (Read 1092 times)

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
While we are at it, why not limit the number of negative ratings that one user can give to another? Some sane limit e.g. 20 would be sufficient (AFAIK there has been no case where 10 was legitimately hit let alone more).

Limits for thee, but no limits for me.
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
What "fudder" means?
I guess he want's to say someone is spreading FUD.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 526
What "fudder" means?

I think there is another meaning different from what Urban Dictionary says. =)

Quote
Urban Dictionary: Fudder
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Fudder
The act of saying an epic joke in your head, but when you say it, you stutter like Pokey Pig.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
While we are at it, why not limit the number of negative ratings that one user can give to another? Some sane limit e.g. 20 would be sufficient (AFAIK there has been no case where 10 was legitimately hit let alone more).
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1233
Or just showing the two first lines followed by a "view more" button.
Sometimes, it is useful to leave a long feedback .
It would be nice if have a limit 2-3 lines for leaving trust rating, not exceeding by that.

Or newbie accounts will allow to leave trust ratings 1 line only.
And Jr. member to Member rank 1-2 line allowed, it is good?

My guess that trust spammers are a sock puppet on a single person.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!

You just added to Jet Cash's ignore list  Tongue
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 14
If it was possible that after a member red tagged him/her for an offense any other member red tagging him/her for that same offense should just come under the former and not having another box of its own. It was clear he/she was red tagged severally for same offense.
Also after seeing the first five you already sure this is a no go area account in terms of any dealings
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
Red tag the guy for trust spamming.
Tbh, I'm just jealous that I've got a shorter one Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 3097
Top Crypto Casino
Or just showing the two first lines followed by a "view more" button.
Sometimes, it is useful to leave a long feedback .
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Red tag the guy for trust spamming. Smiley
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
~
LOL that was a quite long feedback  Tongue
Limiting only number of lines may work fine.

PS: Did you notice - he started with few lines then he multiplied it for the next one and the next one LOL
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
Quite simply, I find reading trust ratings like the one below tiresome.
I suggest limiting the allowed number of characters and newlines.

Example: from the Trust summary for arguelles84.
And yes, that's a single rating for a single user.
Quote
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
NEONAZI
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
NEONAZI
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
NEONAZI
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
NEONAZI
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
NEONAZI
ATTENTION!!!
WARNING!!!!!
ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!
SCAM!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

ATTENTION!!!

Pages:
Jump to: