Pages:
Author

Topic: [SUGGESTION] Multiple Users Self-Moderating A Thread. (Read 355 times)

sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 387
Rollbit is for you. Take $RLB token!
We can’t say if there’s a circumstance where the OP will not be able to come online for some time, maybe sick, busy or something. The users he or she added to their  self-moderated topic could be of help during that period and it’s fine in my opinion.
The co-moderators of one topic should be chosen before you publish your self-moderated topic. I don't believe that theymos will allow to edit co-moderator list of a self-moderated if he deploys a new feature, co-moderated topic for community.

In addition, if you are the main moderator, the author of a topic, it's impossible to choose a co-moderator after you get an accident and no longer is able to use the forum.

Quote
Reporting to the forum moderators about such posts in such threads is like giving them extra work to do.
If the forum is clean and has good quality, forum moderators don't need extra works to do.
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 701
Well, I can see that many people are buying the idea, but to me, if one cannot fully control his or her thread alone, then he or she should allow moderators to manage it for them.
I think like you. I wouldn't waste time implementing that. If the creator of a self moderated thread is absent from the forum, the posts in that thread can be reported to the moderators.

We can’t say if there’s a circumstance where the OP will not be able to come online for some time, maybe sick, busy or something. The users he or she added to their  self-moderated topic could be of help during that period and it’s fine in my opinion. Reporting to the forum moderators about such posts in such threads is like giving them extra work to do. I like the main OP’s idea.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
This is something new and I don't know if there is modification software created for SMF by the SMF team or by an independent developer for SMF, but like all the others' suggestions everyone can moderate a topic by reporting it to moderators not because you have moderated a topic you're the only one who can delete a topic the report a post button can help the topic to be moderated by other members if they think the topic is spam.

And I don't know if all will agree to co-moderate your own thread they may not have time to look at topics where they are chosen to co-moderate, if ever this is integrated there should be an option to not approve to be a co-moderator.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1225
Once a man, twice a child!
for some reason couldn't come online for a long time...

What do you guys think?..
This is the only reason I think this stands a chance of making sense, if at all it should. Otherwise, it's redundancy. That only reason for me could be in the event of the OP's demise or complete incapacitation. Other than that, I don't think there's a need for it. Whenever OP comes online they can moderate their thread and do the needful. What if the other mod(s) deletes what OP believes (while still active) is constructive and before anyone could say Jack it's gone? What of such happening? Wouldn't that bring friction between or among OP's co-mods?
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1298
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
I don't think it makes sense to introduce such new features to the current version of the forum software, at least as long as the new forum software, EpochTalk, is still on the roadmap (Is it really? I hope it is.) Such a feature would only bring new confusion and a bunch of unknowns for the community, and it's better for the admins to focus on implementing EpochTalk smoothly and ensuring a seamless transition for users.
It has been years that people has been waiting for EpochTalk but nothing up till now. We do not know how long it would still take before this will be done.

Once EpochTalk is fully integrated and proven to be stable, we can revisit the idea of introducing new features to enhance the forum experience.
What I later thought about having other people to self moderate threads is that it can lead to some people not creating normal threads again than self moderated threads and they may have self-centred opinion.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
I don't think it makes sense to introduce such new features to the current version of the forum software, at least as long as the new forum software, EpochTalk, is still on the roadmap (Is it really? I hope it is.) Such a feature would only bring new confusion and a bunch of unknowns for the community, and it's better for the admins to focus on implementing EpochTalk smoothly and ensuring a seamless transition for users.
Once EpochTalk is fully integrated and proven to be stable, we can revisit the idea of introducing new features to enhance the forum experience.
legendary
Activity: 2870
Merit: 7490
Crypto Swap Exchange
It's great idea, although i expect only big group (such as for-profit company or altcoin team) would utilize this feature.

It would be a nice feature...

In the past, i always argued that, sooner or later, we'd get new forum software (epochtalk) and that meddling with SMF's sourcecode to implement even more custom code wasn't that good of an idear... There was even a time i was running an epochtalk instance so i could make bug or feature requests in the repo (not that this ever happened tough). But when i look at the repo now, i see the last release was allmost 3 years ago, so i wonder if it might be a good idear to start asking for changes on SMF again (since the new forum software doesn't seem to be going anywhere anytime soon).

I think you're looking at wrong repository. I don't remember the reason, but it seems the work moved to those repository
https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk_server
https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk-vue

Make sure to check other branch of those repository as well. I also remember someone mention there's Discord where the developer talk more about progress of the development, but i can't recall much about it.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 80
Don Pedro Dinero alt account
Well, I can see that many people are buying the idea, but to me, if one cannot fully control his or her thread alone, then he or she should allow moderators to manage it for them.

I think like you. I wouldn't waste time implementing that. If the creator of a self moderated thread is absent from the forum, the posts in that thread can be reported to the moderators.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 511
OP,this is a good idea that you came up with but as for me,I think that for the addition of more users to moderate a self-moderated thread is irrelevant and might cause complications on post to delete or not because it is the OP of the thread that knows what he wants and which post he will delete that is off topic due to the insight that he has to create such topic. Theymos wouldn't see this as something important because he is very busy with other important things that will added more value to the community than this topic. The word self means it should be done personally by the thread poster and not anyone. So if the OP of a self moderated thread will have some challenges in the nearest future to filter or delete off topic post,then let him leave the thread open to forum moderators where users can report off topic thread to the forum moderators so that it will be deleted
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1982
Fully Regulated Crypto Casino
Yes, this suggestion is somewhat useful in some cases, especially those in which the thread is expected to be very large and extended over a long period of time, such as the threads of campaigns, competitions, and so on. This option will be very helpful to the Op in managing this long thread and keeping it clean.

But on the other hand, Op and co-member may not have the same criteria for deleting posts that they don't like, I mean the view may be different for different people is "this post is spam or not"?
full member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 219
I like the idea but what if the user abuses that feature you know like creating their own echo chamber where the user and their chosen users can just delete the posts that aren't necessarily agreeing with their POV but still a valid opinion. Plus self-moderated would lose it's meaning, I think that it's the responsibility of the OP alone to clean the thread that he/she started. And if it's really a good idea in the first place, I'm sure @theymos would've added that feature a long time ago.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
...
How about an option to add more user(s) of your choice to co-moderate a your self-moderated thread alongside yourself (the op)?
That means that I can choose whoever I want, even randomly, and someone else could do the same, that opens big can of worms that nobody can control.

If you wanted to propose something useful than explain it better, don't expect from other members to speculate and fill blank spaces in few of your dream sentences.

I am against this suggestion. Full stop.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
How about an option to add more user(s) of your choice to co-moderate a your self-moderated thread alongside yourself (the op)?
I don't see any good reason why anyone would do that?
First you don't know if other members you selected would accept to moderate your topic, and second they could delete all posts and lock your topic at any time without explanation.
If someone randomly selected me for moderating their topic I most likely wouldn't even know about that and I wouldn't do any moderating for them.
Lot of complications and that usually means more problems down the line.
First, why would anyone want to randomly add users to moderate their topic, that is not what I meant with the idea, for such a feature, you first have to reach out to the user you are interested in adding, first make sure they will are interested and will accept your invitation, before you proceed with inviting such a user.
Secondly , you should not invite users you are not sure you trust, that is, only have users you personally trust help you moderate your thread, and even when you will be adding random users, make sure to choose those with good reputation on the forum , this solves the problem of "what is the user deletes all comments and locks the thread" , such a thing can never happen if you choose the right users, and by the way, why would any body want to do that in the first place? what will be their profit or gain if they do that, if not destroy their reputation?.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
How about an option to add more user(s) of your choice to co-moderate a your self-moderated thread alongside yourself (the op)?
I don't see any good reason why anyone would do that?
First you don't know if other members you selected would accept to moderate your topic, and second they could delete all posts and lock your topic at any time without explanation.
If someone randomly selected me for moderating their topic I most likely wouldn't even know about that and I wouldn't do any moderating for them.
Lot of complications and that usually means more problems down the line.



hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 744
Well, I can see that many people are buying the idea, but to me, if one cannot fully control his or her thread alone, then he or she should allow moderators to manage it for them.

Many of us have different ways of qualifying a post as a quality post. What you can consider a quality post might not be up to the standard of another user. Therefore, if you add some users to moderate your post, they might delete some content that may be worth leaving in the thread. Therefore, I think any thread that is self-moderated is under the watch of the OP. Therefore, the OP should have time to monitor the thread until he/she is satisfied with the thread.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 133
- hello doctor who box
It will be very helpful for accounts that were created for business purposes. May be the copper membership should have the feature added. For a personal account I don't think it will be a logical feature.
hero member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 653
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well there is a sense into what you just said over here but also come to think of this, what if people planned or scamming people and got their post deleted since is a self moderated by which 3 users has access to the thread and topic, how do you think you could get the right person who deleted the post and at last the op could be tag for scamming people while some you added to do list or to operate has quickly acted smartly and deleted every other post in that thread and it happens you came online and see series of tag on your profile what would you do, because i know people are too funny most at time they may said you got your alt account added and you went offline.
Please this only applicable to an financial thread or a business thread that contains transactions.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 538
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This idea would really be good if it could be added as a feature on the forum, but I think it cannot really be considered being added so soon because the forum is already self-moderated and moderator moderation is cool. If one really wants to make a topic self-moderated, then they should be ready to have the time to delete any inappropriate comments.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 3983
What do you guys think?..
I hope to see this feature, even at the paid memberships level such as the Copper member or any other membership, if there is any misuse of it.

But as a simple solution at the present time, it is possible to create a temporary account specifically for a specific topic and give access to that account to several users, and here each user can add his name at the end of each post to know who is using the account, and the work team can monitor the IP address page to see who deleted any reply.

Its case was , theymos change its ownership[1] by voting 56 active users in the thread.
For this case, it could be useful if added but not really necessary imo, but i dont think it will be implemented or only if everyone will agree to have to it.
I used to think that this topic is managed by one user, so perhaps we need such solutions for some altcoin threads. Shocked
hero member
Activity: 462
Merit: 767
Instant cryptocurrency exchange with own reserves!
I can see this feature being useful in certain occasions, but since they are so rare I don't really think that theymos will want waste his time time implementing something like this. Especially since there are much more important things to implement, like 2fa for example.

You never know if PowerGloves will develop a patch to solve this. If I am not wrong, he already coded the 2FA patch, and I don't know where he is now. Not sure if theymos will implement these patches. But I feel like this development could be helpful for some mega threads. Gambling discussions have some self-moderated threads, but the creator rarely moderates those.

Sometimes people post nonsense and don't even know what they are talking about. WO thread will be benefited, and infofront might appoint some members to keep it clean. If this happens and infofront appoints some forum police, Twitter posters will be in trouble.
Pages:
Jump to: