Pages:
Author

Topic: Suing Bitcointalk.org and Theymos for $20,000,000 for facilitating scams - page 2. (Read 4162 times)

vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
Plaintiff: Cryptcracker and the people
Defendant: Bitcointalk.org, Michael Marquardt (Theymos) & staff

Complaint: Michael Marquardt has manufactured and endorsed an unsafe environment on bitcointalk.org that has resulted in many people losing millions of dollars in total as a direct result of Michael Marquardt and other staff actions.

General complaint

Bitcointalk.org is an internet forum centered around bitcoin and other crypto currencies. Bitcointalk.org is one of if not the biggest and most influential bitcoin and crypto currency communication sites in the world, Michael Marquardt and his associates used this fact as an opportunity to take advantage of people. The rise in price of bitcoin resulted in many new people joining the forum that weren’t to savvy and completely new to the space, once these people joined the forum they were greeted by scams that were even endorsed by some staff members. By even hosting these scams bitcointalk.org was endorsing them and choosing to put their members in danger.

Trendon Shavers (pirateat40) ponzi

One of the biggest scams hosted on bitcointalk.org was that of Trendon Shaver’s (which went by the name pirateat40 on bitcointalk.org) ponzi scheme. This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org and resulted in Trendon Shavers controlling over 764,000 bitcoin, at the time worth $4.6 million, at today’s prices those coins are worth $353,869,520 million. Many other highly damaging scams were hosted on bitcointalk.org and if Michael Marquardt stays in control of bitcointalk.org another catastrophic scam will likely be hosted and endorsed by bitcointalk.org.

Reparation

A $20,000,000 settlement from the defendant payable to the plaintiff is required to solve wrongdoing that has been done. Bitcointalk.org may also be placed in the hands of the plaintiff as partial payment if the defendants can not pay the full $20,000,000.

What is your cause of action?

314 lashes with an al dente noodle.

full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
I really hope this is a joke, if so, I laughed really hard at this.

If this isnt a joke, my god  Shocked
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Cryptcrackpot, will you be suing the CIA as well?

3rd dispatch: https://twitter.com/cryptcracker1/status/727251055164141570

Sorry I haven't posted in a while I have been doing some serious research. I have decided to post this as my 3rd dispatch, now that that's settled I can direct more resources to taking down Paul and his associates once I'm finished with this.

I'm now genuinely worried for your safety. Is there a utility van parked across the street? This is serious shit, CIA won't take this tweet likely. They will kill you, your dog, your neighbors and anyone who's reading this.

Quote
Many of you know me as cryptcracker, the bounty hunter that is uncovering the truth behind the Crypty "hack" and bringing the perpetrators to justice. However I have been doing this kind of work far before the cryptsy incident, I am making this dispatch today to reveal crucial information on the sudden news about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity and the plot Gavin Andresen has been involved in.
 
Satoshi was the greatest mind that I have seen in ages always calm and collected a real genius. Notice that I said was, that's because I'm sorry to say Satoshi Nakamoto was murdered by Gavin Andresen and his CIA associates. The CIA saw the transparency of the blockchain and they thought this would be a good way to track their "dirty subordinates". Let me explain, the CIA gives money, guns and drugs to terrorists so they can do things like stage a coup and overthrow governments this is well documented. The CIA saw the transparency of bitcoin and got the idea to start using bitcoin as one of the ways they fund these dirty subordinates.
 
Gavin was given the task of identifying Satoshi and flipping on him which he did. Once Satoshi was found and about to be captured I was informed 1 of 2 things happened, Satoshi committed suicide or the authorities were successful in capturing Satoshi and Satoshi was tortured and then killed. I am sorry for not being 100% certain on which one it is but it was one of the two I know this because my sources also relayed documents to me showing Satoshis dead body and classified CIA files. 
 
Craig Wright was chosen as the CIA's front man to act like he was the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Gavin Andresen was to use his position in the community to pass this off. However these fools completely botched there plan because 1. they don't have the keys to the best of my knowledge and 2. they over estimated their manipulative tactics. The CIA got used to pulling these tactics on the general population but they didn't understand something this transparent wouldn't work against the bitcoin Community since it's much more tech savvy.
 
This was one of the saddest stories that I have known about for a while and I think it needs to get out there. I am currently hesitant in releasing the confidential CIA files because if Satoshi's identity is know his friends and family will be in danger along with my sources. I will attempt to secure them so they are not in danger once that is done I might be able to release the files.
 
Thank you for your time, another dispatch will be coming soon.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1026
Hire me for Bounty Management
This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org
allowing a topic on the forum doesn't mean they endorse anything just so you know
Exactly.It is a free forum and everyone is allowed to create any topic and post replies in them.Just like this nonsense topic is allowed here,others are also allowed but does it mean bitcointalk.org endorse this topic also?definitely not
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org
allowing a topic on the forum doesn't mean they endorse anything just so you know
Even more so its "not not allowing". Theymos does not click approve on any topic and is probably unaware of 95% of threads.
But that would mean someone else is to blame for the loss OP had to face, maybe even OP himself?
Guys, you can't expect people on the internet to take the responsibility for their actions themselves (or can you?).
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org
allowing a topic on the forum doesn't mean they endorse anything just so you know

Even more so its "not not allowing". Theymos does not click approve on any topic and is probably unaware of 95% of threads.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014
This ponzi scheme was endorsed by bitcointalk.org
allowing a topic on the forum doesn't mean they endorse anything just so you know
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1062
One coin to rule them all
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
Theymos has first only cleared that the forum doesn't hold any responsibility for any scams that take place on this forum. It's user's responsibility to know whom they should trade with and if they are careless, you can't really blame anyone then. The ads too have a disclaimer if you've read it. "Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here."
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
No, I don't think so. He'd probably sue the Nigerian prince.
Exactly. That's why this is just nonsense. Seems like OP needs to hire a internet babysiter.

method not clear, boiled my cat and broke 3 fingers
Nice 'trollish' post. Don't forget to sue OP for faciliating harmful actions. Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Not sure if this is the right section for posting jokes, also you've missed April 1st by some days,
but hey, I had to smile, so I'm gonna say Good job, OP.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
I don't bite.
Do you sue hotmail for this? The only one that needs to be blamed is your own brain. Roll Eyes
No, I don't think so. He'd probably sue the Nigerian prince.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1317
Get your game girl
Since everyone is replying with meme's.I'd like my dank meme to be a part of them.

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3000
Terminated.
Plaintiff: Cryptcracker and the people
Defendant: Bitcointalk.org, Michael Marquardt (Theymos) & staff



I can't even being to describe how ridiculous this is. Example: You have a hotmail account. You receive an email from the Nigerian prince asking for your personal information for money transfer. You give him that information. Things go "nicely" afterwards. Do you sue hotmail for this? The only one that needs to be blamed is your own brain. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Here I am wondering how are you even gonna pay your legal fees if any lawyer actually takes up your offer

Some lawyers will take a percentage once case is settled so you pay nothing upfront

That is very not likely for this type of matter or its circumstances.
It will be very hard to find a good law firm that would take this up on contingency.

Also, there isn't really any money in this anyway, so this is just fappin in wind.

Edit: fixed redundant word and underlined "very".

I would agree it's highly unlikely a lawyer will take this case based on a percentage.  Ones they do on percentage in most cases are sure bet's that they know they will see a check after possibly months if not years of work.

Lawyers like getting paid though so most likely they would advise OP it's highly un-likely he get's anything.  But if he is willing to pay them to fight a battle they know is a loss some lawyers would take it on.  

But your mentioned.... about doing something in the wind... is pretty much right on this.  You will notice it does not have a law-firm's name attached to above that tells a lot.
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024



Who the hell is "Michael Marquardt?


~BCX~
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501
You need to pass us some of that shit you're smoking OP
Pages:
Jump to: