Topic: Summary on Anonymous Coin (Read 3587 times)
Please add total coin supply and coins added per day columns. Will help evaluate coin worth.
Hi,
You forgot to write about Pink Coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-revamped-pinkcoin-pc-pink-pos-multipool-fundraiser-anonymous-624017
380 million coins.
Anon transaction through SSL website. No wallet for anon yet.
Regards
You forgot to write about Pink Coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-revamped-pinkcoin-pc-pink-pos-multipool-fundraiser-anonymous-624017
380 million coins.
Anon transaction through SSL website. No wallet for anon yet.
Regards
Add Anoncoin.
Plan is "trustless ZeroCoin".
Done is
.
Thread is: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/official-anoncoin-chat-thread-including-history-227287
Plan is "trustless ZeroCoin".
Done is
.Thread is: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/official-anoncoin-chat-thread-including-history-227287
You missed Pinkcoin, it has working anon.
What kind of anonymity features does pinkcoin have?
Anon website that hides transactions, does something new with the coins. This is not coin mixing or anything like that. Check out the whitepaper in my signature.
NiteSend whitepaper : https://mega.co.nz/#!xhYWBA4S!RLqpU3b-iJub6GUUvp0WZvwfrLCaXTjYahvSHm_3DEA
You missed Pinkcoin, it has working anon.
What kind of anonymity features does pinkcoin have?
You missed Pinkcoin, it has working anon.
Maybe you could add column about developers. Their names, qualifications etc. Are they known? Are they anonymous/shady? Maybe something about their motivation for development of anon features (premine or they really believe that anonymity can bring something positive in this world)?
One other note - I'm not sure if you have a solid grounding mathematics or cryptography, but you should take a read of our ongoing project to peer-review and annotate the CryptoNote whitepaper (it has had no formal peer review that anyone is aware of). The two primary peer reviewers are PhD-holding mathematicians and cryptographers. You can find it here: http://monero.cc/downloads/whitepaper_annotated.pdf
I know this is a little bit off-topic, but can Monero/CryptoNote community add some info about their developers to
http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/28kea5/what_do_we_know_about_anonymous_coin_developers/
You can add SYNC to the list
No Anoncoin?
Just read the column under Zerocoin! 
One other note - I'm not sure if you have a solid grounding mathematics or cryptography, but you should take a read of our ongoing project to peer-review and annotate the CryptoNote whitepaper (it has had no formal peer review that anyone is aware of). The two primary peer reviewers are PhD-holding mathematicians and cryptographers. You can find it here: http://monero.cc/downloads/whitepaper_annotated.pdf
Thanks for your advice will do more research on this and correct some mistakes.
Thanks for all the feedback, i will try my best to correct some mistakes.
and will add more coins on that table.
and will add more coins on that table.
No Anoncoin?
You should add to the Weakness side of DRK that the Total amount got degreased after lunch and it had an heavy instamine from the devs which is about 40% of the current supply.
That's not a weakness. Learn the definition of a weakness coming from a technical perspective.You're still crying that you did not get in on time.
There are individuals who hold more than the developer/s.
One-way function exist?
I don't understand what this means - can you elaborate?
I don't understand what this means - can you elaborate?
As far as I can tell, this is brought up in the context of CryptoNote because spent key images are generated with a one way function -- so that we can prevent double-spending without knowing the corresponding public key (thus preserving anonymity). I don't know what specifically CN uses, but the existence of one-way functions is a general CS question and not specific to cryptocurrencies, let alone CN-based cryptocurrencies. I think the answer to it is probably yes, or close enough to it. All good hash functions should be one-way functions, for example, or they would be vulnerable to a preimage attack.
One other note - I'm not sure if you have a solid grounding mathematics or cryptography, but you should take a read of our ongoing project to peer-review and annotate the CryptoNote whitepaper (it has had no formal peer review that anyone is aware of). The two primary peer reviewers are PhD-holding mathematicians and cryptographers. You can find it here: http://monero.cc/downloads/whitepaper_annotated.pdf
You should add to the Weakness side of DRK that the Total amount got degreased after lunch and it had an heavy instamine from the devs which is about 40% of the current supply.
With regards to Monero:
Mayers-Lo-Chau no go theorem
MLC's no-go theorem is a problem, not for Monero, for ALL hash function based proof-of-work related systems. That having been said, there is so much work that has been done since the initial publication that it is a non-issue for quantum cryptography. Specifically, and for a light introduction to some of the work, it is best to take a glance at Chi-Yee Cheung's Quantum Teleportation and Bit Commitment slides from 2009. This section in particular:
Make sure to list no-go theorems as a problem for every single coin in your list. Thankfully, they're not much of a concern until we live in Star Trek:)
One-way function exist?
I don't understand what this means - can you elaborate?
Mayers-Lo-Chau no go theorem
MLC's no-go theorem is a problem, not for Monero, for ALL hash function based proof-of-work related systems. That having been said, there is so much work that has been done since the initial publication that it is a non-issue for quantum cryptography. Specifically, and for a light introduction to some of the work, it is best to take a glance at Chi-Yee Cheung's Quantum Teleportation and Bit Commitment slides from 2009. This section in particular:
Quote
Question: Does the “no-go theorem” cover all possible cases?
Note that QBC has a definite objective, but the corresponding procedure is not precisely defined.
There are infinitely many ways to do QBC.
So how could one be sure the no-go result is universally valid?
Note that QBC has a definite objective, but the corresponding procedure is not precisely defined.
There are infinitely many ways to do QBC.
So how could one be sure the no-go result is universally valid?
Make sure to list no-go theorems as a problem for every single coin in your list. Thankfully, they're not much of a concern until we live in Star Trek:)
One-way function exist?
I don't understand what this means - can you elaborate?
Nice table. Although you should read up about the recent news regarding DRK. It's being worked on and a fork will be released tomorrow for the masternodes.
Jump to: