Topic: Super Low caps - which is most legit? - page 2. (Read 842 times)
Before you invest in anything. You have to do your "own" homework.
I don't know any of the listed coins. I will give a look. It is very important to chose a coin where the devs seem to be really committed. Sometimes coins die when devs just abandon them and nobody picks them up...
theyre probably all scam coins, but if one wasn't a scam and is a 100x - 1000x - which one would it be?
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
iam prefered choose TKR(trackr)
second placed choose dent, because dent price is cheap, same with NEM can potential incraese very high
theyre probably all scam coins, but if one wasn't a scam and is a 100x - 1000x - which one would it be?
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
First you need to clarify what you understand for legit/scam.
For me there is no way a COIN listed in coinmarketcap to be scam because for me the definition of scam is probably different from yours. Scam for me is a project that just run away with you money and don't deliver anything almost immediately after raising funds, some of them claim they got hacked, stolen in some way.
Things I don't consider scam but just failure:
* Project deliver code but it is not working as intended by lack of technical capacity and don't go live/mainnet;
* Project lack to maintain growing interest and or user base;
* Project lack if funding / marketcap;
So for me scam is a definition pretty close to robbery and or steal like take and run and if they got listed they didn't run, at least yet !
Quote
Definition of scam:
a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation an insurance scam
a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation an insurance scam
I was looking a low market caps because of higher potential returns. But i also eliminated coins that had premined, or very have low coin supply. these coins are the only ones with decent websites/roadmap, also have a certain amount of organic growth. A couple of them have anonymous dev teams, which does not inspire my confidence. but ultimately, these were the only coins worth having a look (i went through everysingle coin/token in the 100k-1mil cap on coinmarket) so yes i did do my own research, was looking more for consensus
IMHO, your approach is not that good.
Remember that you are investing and as such look for the return. It is about percentage.
Consider all factors; market cap, coin qty, unit cost, ranking, etc. For me the most important factor is the volume. No matter how good the dev team, the project, etc....if the people/masses don't support it, it won't go anywhere. The best indicator of that is the daily volumes. HOWEVER, watch for pump and dumps. Your range is sadly the most susceptible to it. You need to look at historical data for consistent growth/volume. This is a general rule that may not fit all. New coins for example may not fit well with this so adjust as needed.
It also depends on your goal. I have 3 categories; short, medium, and long term coins. Each require a different approach to them.
Hope this helps.
I'm more into the longterm approach, most of the coins listed are fairly new to the market (btw i listed the wrong ticker symbol for SPHR - its actually XID) - im just hunting for the next gem
There need to be at least a reason for a new coin to rise rapidly.
Among the new coins Ethereum and monero got success and we now clearly know why that happend.
In such competition there is not much to expect from new coins.
At least you can buy them cheap and sell them getting 20-50% profit.
Among the new coins Ethereum and monero got success and we now clearly know why that happend.
In such competition there is not much to expect from new coins.
At least you can buy them cheap and sell them getting 20-50% profit.
People are talking about ebtc. The name sound so cool like a new bitcoin. The cap is super low right now. It is under 50k on coinmarketcap. The coin intend to bring smart contract to bitcoin vice- versa
I was looking a low market caps because of higher potential returns. But i also eliminated coins that had premined, or very have low coin supply. these coins are the only ones with decent websites/roadmap, also have a certain amount of organic growth. A couple of them have anonymous dev teams, which does not inspire my confidence. but ultimately, these were the only coins worth having a look (i went through everysingle coin/token in the 100k-1mil cap on coinmarket) so yes i did do my own research, was looking more for consensus
IMHO, your approach is not that good.
Remember that you are investing and as such look for the return. It is about percentage.
Consider all factors; market cap, coin qty, unit cost, ranking, etc. For me the most important factor is the volume. No matter how good the dev team, the project, etc....if the people/masses don't support it, it won't go anywhere. The best indicator of that is the daily volumes. HOWEVER, watch for pump and dumps. Your range is sadly the most susceptible to it. You need to look at historical data for consistent growth/volume. This is a general rule that may not fit all. New coins for example may not fit well with this so adjust as needed.
It also depends on your goal. I have 3 categories; short, medium, and long term coins. Each require a different approach to them.
Hope this helps.
"scam coins" never last long. they will always die pretty soon. having a low market cap does not make them scam, it just makes them crappy coins like others.
the same thing is true about having a high market cap. that doesn't make a coin legit, it just means the high cap coin could fool more people into investing in it than the other coins ever could.
this is why you should seriously stop looking at the market capitalization of different coins. it is very misleading.
the same thing is true about having a high market cap. that doesn't make a coin legit, it just means the high cap coin could fool more people into investing in it than the other coins ever could.
this is why you should seriously stop looking at the market capitalization of different coins. it is very misleading.
I was looking a low market caps because of higher potential returns. But i also eliminated coins that had premined, or very have low coin supply. these coins are the only ones with decent websites/roadmap, also have a certain amount of organic growth. A couple of them have anonymous dev teams, which does not inspire my confidence. but ultimately, these were the only coins worth having a look (i went through everysingle coin/token in the 100k-1mil cap on coinmarket) so yes i did do my own research, was looking more for consensus
I had a good idea about my activity tokens but I couldn't list it on any exchanges because I really didn't try, I just PMed a few exchange admins telling about my ideas and how they could benefit from it, they never responded to me, half fledged lol. I see many of scam coins are in coinmarket, it makes me feel like useless person with no hopes for the future, I need to end my life now. another half fledged lol.
All the super low caps coins are legit if they are not ICO. if they can be mined, ask yourself why no body is mining them? you are looking for something like Bitcoin but lol seriously?
Also what is COSS? I like it already even if it's a scam, because coss means pussy in my language, let me have some please. explosion of lols.
All the super low caps coins are legit if they are not ICO. if they can be mined, ask yourself why no body is mining them? you are looking for something like Bitcoin but lol seriously?
Also what is COSS? I like it already even if it's a scam, because coss means pussy in my language, let me have some please. explosion of lols.
"scam coins" never last long. they will always die pretty soon. having a low market cap does not make them scam, it just makes them crappy coins like others.
the same thing is true about having a high market cap. that doesn't make a coin legit, it just means the high cap coin could fool more people into investing in it than the other coins ever could.
this is why you should seriously stop looking at the market capitalization of different coins. it is very misleading.
the same thing is true about having a high market cap. that doesn't make a coin legit, it just means the high cap coin could fool more people into investing in it than the other coins ever could.
this is why you should seriously stop looking at the market capitalization of different coins. it is very misleading.
Unfortunately I've heard about SPHR only. Just because it's a little bit more popular than others. According to graphs COSS is most interesting for investment I suppose. But fundamental analysis should be much more important here.
If you have such suspicion about only these coins there is the way to make profit anyway. Divide your deposit and invest same parts at each of them
P.S. Check out ZEN. It has a little bigger cap, but it's very promising coin!
If you have such suspicion about only these coins there is the way to make profit anyway. Divide your deposit and invest same parts at each of them
P.S. Check out ZEN. It has a little bigger cap, but it's very promising coin!
Asking for opinion means that you will get influenced by someone else. The next gem is hidden and will remain so until the whale has completed to accumulate it. Then it will start being talked about in forms such as this and over twitter. DYOR
Its cindicator is the real deal and the real t9ken which has value. You can see about it at datadash youtube. And you can googling it about the project about the roadmap about how smooth they run the ico.all is great in my opinion. Its not like other ico which promises bonus. All participant get same price.
theyre probably all scam coins, but if one wasn't a scam and is a 100x - 1000x - which one would it be?
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
SPHR, UNIFY, COSS, DDF, ENT, TKR, DALC, Q2C
Jump to: