SuperNet, are you in? - page 3. | Bitcointalksearch.org

devphp

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Quote from: Fernandez on September 12, 2014, 02:13:51 AM

Can't decide whether its worthy investing in it. Has too much of a single point of failure, and sounds like an elaborate, organized pump and dump.

Invest a little, as much as you are ready to lose. Accumulate more on dips as your certainty grows, it will be available to trade on NXT Asset Exchange after the sale is over. Or sell, if you certainty lessens

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

Quote from: Fernandez on September 12, 2014, 02:13:51 AM

Can't decide whether its worthy investing in it. Has too much of a single point of failure, and sounds like an elaborate, organized pump and dump.

If so, just wait to sell just before the dump. Profit! Grin

Fernandez

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Can't decide whether its worthy investing in it. Has too much of a single point of failure, and sounds like an elaborate, organized pump and dump.

devphp

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Quote from: statdude on September 11, 2014, 05:20:34 PM

How much has SuperNET raised on BTER?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8781189

statdude

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1000

How much has SuperNET raised on BTER?

Marlo Stanfield

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 280

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 10, 2014, 11:21:17 AM

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 10, 2014, 04:54:17 AM

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 11:16:28 AM

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 09, 2014, 10:48:14 AM

In this thread: People who have no idea what their talking about or what superNET even is.

People complain about all the "shitcoins" around and now we have a viable contender for something that can come together and make inferior coins irrelevant.

And spoetnik: You apparently have no idea what's going on as usual. You don't bother to read up on things before you post. And since these are shares, buying up more shares does not attract more "greedy bagholders" as you put it. Each share bought makes the others a lower percentage of the total. This is not a cryptocurrency. Read up.

dumbest comment of the day.

it's a "share" so i can't be a bag holder Roll Eyes

You're claiming that people will be suckered in by someone purchasing shares in their own IPO. Why would someone want that? The lower amount of shares held means a higher percent of dividends paid to shareholders. You're confusing this with an IPO of a cryptocurrency where the supply is limited. The supply of shares in this case is effectively unlimited. So what you were saying up thread does not apply.

I'm not saying that it's impossible that the value of UNITY shares goes down over time. You're postings always consist of you spewing your preformed opinions on things while you fail to read in to what is actually going on before posting.

so it's free ? wow great gimme some then..

Would you rather be the only shareholder of a company and get 100% of the profits, or would you rather be one of one hundred shareholders and receive 1% of the profits?

Do you see now how the dev buying more to trick people in to buying it doesn't make any sense when someone is selling shares in an asset backed investment?

And why you think my post implied that shares in superNET were free, I have no idea.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 10, 2014, 04:54:17 AM

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 11:16:28 AM

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 09, 2014, 10:48:14 AM

In this thread: People who have no idea what their talking about or what superNET even is.

People complain about all the "shitcoins" around and now we have a viable contender for something that can come together and make inferior coins irrelevant.

And spoetnik: You apparently have no idea what's going on as usual. You don't bother to read up on things before you post. And since these are shares, buying up more shares does not attract more "greedy bagholders" as you put it. Each share bought makes the others a lower percentage of the total. This is not a cryptocurrency. Read up.

dumbest comment of the day.

it's a "share" so i can't be a bag holder Roll Eyes

You're claiming that people will be suckered in by someone purchasing shares in their own IPO. Why would someone want that? The lower amount of shares held means a higher percent of dividends paid to shareholders. You're confusing this with an IPO of a cryptocurrency where the supply is limited. The supply of shares in this case is effectively unlimited. So what you were saying up thread does not apply.

I'm not saying that it's impossible that the value of UNITY shares goes down over time. You're postings always consist of you spewing your preformed opinions on things while you fail to read in to what is actually going on before posting.

so it's free ? wow great gimme some then..

Marlo Stanfield

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 280

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 11:16:28 AM

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 09, 2014, 10:48:14 AM

In this thread: People who have no idea what their talking about or what superNET even is.

People complain about all the "shitcoins" around and now we have a viable contender for something that can come together and make inferior coins irrelevant.

And spoetnik: You apparently have no idea what's going on as usual. You don't bother to read up on things before you post. And since these are shares, buying up more shares does not attract more "greedy bagholders" as you put it. Each share bought makes the others a lower percentage of the total. This is not a cryptocurrency. Read up.

dumbest comment of the day.

it's a "share" so i can't be a bag holder Roll Eyes

You're claiming that people will be suckered in by someone purchasing shares in their own IPO. Why would someone want that? The lower amount of shares held means a higher percent of dividends paid to shareholders. You're confusing this with an IPO of a cryptocurrency where the supply is limited. The supply of shares in this case is effectively unlimited. So what you were saying up thread does not apply.

I'm not saying that it's impossible that the value of UNITY shares goes down over time. You're postings always consist of you spewing your preformed opinions on things while you fail to read in to what is actually going on before posting.

ShroomsKit_Disgrace

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!

@Marlo Stanfield,
fair comment, I hope our beloved troll Spoetnik could get a hint on what is SuperNet, and why it is totally different fro ma coin IPO.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: Marlo Stanfield on September 09, 2014, 10:48:14 AM

In this thread: People who have no idea what their talking about or what superNET even is.

People complain about all the "shitcoins" around and now we have a viable contender for something that can come together and make inferior coins irrelevant.

And spoetnik: You apparently have no idea what's going on as usual. You don't bother to read up on things before you post. And since these are shares, buying up more shares does not attract more "greedy bagholders" as you put it. Each share bought makes the others a lower percentage of the total. This is not a cryptocurrency. Read up.

dumbest comment of the day.

it's a "share" so i can't be a bag holder Roll Eyes

Marlo Stanfield

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 280

In this thread: People who have no idea what their talking about or what superNET even is.

People complain about all the "shitcoins" around and now we have a viable contender for something that can come together and make inferior coins irrelevant.

And spoetnik: You apparently have no idea what's going on as usual. You don't bother to read up on things before you post. And since these are shares, buying up more shares does not attract more "greedy bagholders" as you put it. Each share bought makes the others a lower percentage of the total. This is not a cryptocurrency. Read up.

robinwilliams

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: EvilDave on September 09, 2014, 09:40:30 AM

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 09:32:55 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 09, 2014, 02:35:46 AM

No, we don't get your supreme nosense Spoetnik, please gtfo or elaborate a minimum.

if you don't get it then your playing dumb i think..

i could start a coin and have an IPO on it and buy the coins myself and pay me the bitcoin to get the IPO'd coins
and then i could run around the internet saying some investers bought a lot of coins and wow look how popular my coin is !!111
but in reality .... I BOUGHT THEM !
and i paid myself as an illusion to sucker in greedy bag holders.. who will be consumed and devoured *eventually.

i am not trying to be mean or anything but are you slow or brain damaged or something ?
do you think i just invented that concept here and now ?

So, can I take it that you and JackpotCoin won't be joining in the SuperNET ?

jackpot, supernet, spotniek all in the same sentance ... haaaaaaa!!!!!

supernet dumbest shit iv'e ever seen

EvilDave

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 09:32:55 AM

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 09, 2014, 02:35:46 AM

No, we don't get your supreme nosense Spoetnik, please gtfo or elaborate a minimum.

if you don't get it then your playing dumb i think..

i could start a coin and have an IPO on it and buy the coins myself and pay me the bitcoin to get the IPO'd coins
and then i could run around the internet saying some investers bought a lot of coins and wow look how popular my coin is !!111
but in reality .... I BOUGHT THEM !
and i paid myself as an illusion to sucker in greedy bag holders.. who will be consumed and devoured *eventually.

i am not trying to be mean or anything but are you slow or brain damaged or something ?
do you think i just invented that concept here and now ?

So, can I take it that you and JackpotCoin won't be joining in the SuperNET ?

devphp

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 260

Quote from: Spoetnik on September 09, 2014, 09:32:55 AM

i could start a coin and have an IPO on it and buy the coins myself and pay me the bitcoin to get the IPO'd coins
and then i could run around the internet saying some investers bought a lot of coins and wow look how popular my coin is !!111
but in reality .... I BOUGHT THEM !

Spoetnik, then you'd end up buying all the IPO, because nobody would invest anything in your project. That's the difference between you and jl777 Grin

I have no idea if SuperNET will bring any returns or will be a total failure, but you can believe it wasn't jl777's money that is invested in this project, at least not all of it

other people did buy too.

Spoetnik

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1011

FUD Philanthropist™

Quote from: ShroomsKit_Disgrace on September 09, 2014, 02:35:46 AM

No, we don't get your supreme nosense Spoetnik, please gtfo or elaborate a minimum.

if you don't get it then your playing dumb i think..

i could start a coin and have an IPO on it and buy the coins myself and pay me the bitcoin to get the IPO'd coins
and then i could run around the internet saying some investers bought a lot of coins and wow look how popular my coin is !!111
but in reality .... I BOUGHT THEM !
and i paid myself as an illusion to sucker in greedy bag holders.. who will be consumed and devoured *eventually.

i am not trying to be mean or anything but are you slow or brain damaged or something ?
do you think i just invented that concept here and now ?

juicyjuice87

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 250

jl777 is a International man of mystery and an anonymous coding machine. jl777 for president I say!

xucc2012

full member

Activity: 152

Merit: 100

For now Jl777 have shown his genuis on crypto.I choose to believe him.

ilusm

full member

Activity: 139

Merit: 100

For me supernet takes long time and little profit.i'd rather do my own choice.

Nullu

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

The simple truth of the matter is, whether I "believe" in the product or not, I'm likely to make a profit on selling my shares. I would only consider keeping them if substantial evidence came forward that there was a viable product. If not, I'll sell out when the time is right.

So if that makes me a "noob", then I'll be a noob with a slightly increasing BTC balance, as always. Know when to hold, and when to fold. We all know the game by now.

ed_teech

hero member

Activity: 508

Merit: 500

Jahaha

Quote from: johnnyrocket on September 07, 2014, 10:25:13 PM

This thread/poll is just a thinly veiled attempt to help pump the IPO.. do your due diligence and invest wisely.

+1

Topic: SuperNet, are you in? - page 3. (Read 5608 times)