Topic: #SuperStraight (Read 1035 times)

BE WHAT YOU ARE.

That's the real point why there is different genders right now.   

New genders are simply virtual genders.

Mutilation of the body to turn it into a virtual gender winds up being mutilatiom of the soul and spirit as well.

We will never have the ability to change our gender, male to female, or vice versa, at the core of our genes. We will always only be able to mutilate our male or female gender.

Why are you trying to hide? Be what you are, male or female.

Wait, what? The gays get deadly rainbow laser breath? That's a sweet superpower.

Here's the actual issue with that comic though (ignoring the fact that it is a straw man, and a particularly poor one at that): Nobody actually cares if you aren't attracted to a particular gender or a particular type of sex. Everyone has their own preferences, that's fine. The problem is with individuals trying to marginalize, oppress, criminalize, or even kill people based on their gender or type of sex they have.

Like, just don't be a dick. It's not difficult.

Cool. So don't watch them. No one is forcing you to. You don't get to oppress other people based on your feelings, though.

I mean, it's not, but at least you are starting to realize that sexuality is a completely individual thing and you have no right to tell other consenting adults what they can and cannot do.

She was correct 

So are you telling me, you can watch a man fucking another man's asshole and you do not blink an eye? Not even a flinch? That must be a rare quality. I bet you can watch the famous 2 bitches 1 cup video too. (I only did the first 2-3 seconds and I found myself puking right away.)

Good for you.

Watching these scenes just make me puke. (homo porn)

I don't feel the same disgust when I watch a male fucking a female or female fucking a female*. (Straight porn)

*female vs female is straight enough to me.

Back in the mid-1990s, a feminist and Women's Studies professor wrote a book about what she saw as the destruction of feminism as the movement became less and less about protecting and enhancing the lives of women and more about what she referred to as the "Sexual Harassment Industry". She called it Heterophobia, and she was immediately ostracized from the feminist world after she wrote it.

https://www.alibris.com/Heterophobia-Sexual-Harassment-and-the-Future-of-Feminism-Daphne-Patai/book/8317332

The bitcoin logo (on the OP's account) seems to have the exact same colors as the Super Straight logo. Coincidence?

Sure, and if they put as scene of a fight to death between two dogs they are telling you to become a dog a enter into a fight in a Mexican rancho. Just don´t be dumb, you simply do not like gays and feel that their "stuff" should not be shown in public, but you would probably be all right with the scene being "straight". Unless... you are actually having doubts, which is kind of a reason why many people actually hate gays or have issues watching gay scenes.

In general, I have seen an increase in the explict scenes of any gender combination. Gay characters are sometimes there without any particular reason other than showing off "openness of mind", which is the wrong reason to put a character on a plot and they have explicit scenes because the people demand that which is probably not such a good reason to provide these.


No, I can actually watch that scene without blinking an eye because it does not make me feel anything more than watching a bird flying. At most, it can make me envious of their bodies if the guys are gym ripped and have good abs, which is anyway another gay cliché.

This is all really horrible. Who could possibly ever want compassion. I'm also hearing rumors that women are now permitted to produce other humans. Outrageous. Only men should be allowed to do it.

Their used to be something of a public broadcasting standard where programming and commercials were appropriate for all ages, and some rare cases where their were warnings beforehand..
Now it’s degeneracy everywhere..


It’s not the “gay agenda”.. lol you know..
In their agenda LBGT are just pawns, and the “gay agenda”, a thin slice of their workings, is just a tool..
It serves the purpose of weakening, decreasing masculinity and increasing femininity, increasing compassion, pacifism, protectionism, etc..
Serves to hamper individualism, morals, and principles.. Specifically traditional western principles they are trying to destroy by many means simultaneously, including the use of the “gay agenda”.

Breeds good sheep..

Well, at first I hated Flat Earth, and all it stood for. Honestly, even thinking about Flat Earth made me feel a bit sick.
But then I read a few posts there, and I think it converted me. I'm a different person now. If someone tells me the Earth is round, I laugh at them and say no, it's not round, it's an oblate spheroid, which basically is another term for Flat. 'Round' is lunacy. I don't know what my pre-conversion self was thinking.

If you read the Flat Earth thread willingly then that means you like what you see and that means you also believe in a Flat Earth.

This is turning into a new Flat Earth thread. Brilliant.

Or maybe I simply reject the notion that there is a "gay agenda" trying to turn children gay through the medium of TV shows?

"LOL at LGBT people needing their safe spaces, they are such snowflakes!!11!"
"The state should censor all TV in case I see something I don't like."

The democrats want everybody to become a LGBT for a reason. If enough people lose their balls, nobody will have the will to fight these scums. Netflix is one their propaganda machines. Just one of many. Imagine an army of women and men that who want to be women.

Watching a man fucking another man is disgusting. If you can watch this without blinking an eye then it means you like what you see and that means you are also gay.

Or you can just turn the TV off.

I think that most people under 40 don't even do "TV", what with all the on-demand stuff they can watch. So short of China-style censorship how exactly are you proposing to make them watch only church-approved straight white male content?

It can make usual, wanting to be cool/trendy, attention seeking, wanting to stand out, CHILDREN do things and/or mold into lifestyles that will do anything from raise their risk of mental illness, STDs, and rape, to outright permanently disabling themselves, disfiguring themselves, and often killing themselves..
Just to be “cool”..

It’s “just say no to drugs” all over again, but this time it’s “just say no to dangerous sexual degeneracy”..
Likely more dangerous than drugs..


Positive discrimination, lol..



Communist..



It’s called propaganda..
They are doing it for a reason..
I can’t imagine you are unaware of this, therefore I must assume you are in support of their agenda..
Shame..



Most everything on TV is infiltrated by disgusting propaganda these days.. It’s insane.. The push for degeneracy of all flavors is all enveloping..

Once you understand, you can never go back, you can never again become blissfully unaware and will live with the hauntings of your knowledge forever.. It’s in you for life..

These people that try to act like they know so much and defend this shit.. They know exactly what they are doing, and do it for who/you knows what reason..

I really find these type of things useless or if serving a purpose, very minimal. I wonder what type of people really has the time to worry about such things
though. Spreading this kind of information does only nothing but promote more hate and differences between people. While some might only want knowledge people abuse these kind of information and add fuel to fires that are already lit. Not my cup of tea. But in all honesty, was quite a fun read and made me giggle a bit so here's a merit. Have a nice day.

You need to post pictures of yourself in said lingerie and makeup, and if that turns mindrust on then you know what that means.

This topic brought a widest grin on my face I have had in a week. Thanks op, that was very, very entertaining. Keep posting more.

Whoever it is that finds these things normal, I hope your kids grow up watching gay porn in their youths. Good luck everybody. Make sure they all watch netflix 24/7 and it will turn out just fine.

I mean, I don't watch a huge amount of TV, but if your favorite show is putting 10 minutes of gay porn in every ~22 minute long episode, I think there's a high chance you are just watching gay porn.

I'm not sure. I'm mean, I was rewatching some Fresh Prince on VH1 when all of a sudden something called "RuPaul's Drag Race" came on, and within minutes I had spent $300 on lingerie and makeup. Explain that!?

I suggest you stop watching, then.

Nope. I am homophobic. I feel disgusted when I watch 2 men fucking each other.


I didn't say you can. I said I don't like seeing it.


Nope.


Maybe not, it is just not my thing.

Yeah that is probably the case. I don't think you can become gay from watching TV, you must have such feelings before. Nothing wrong with that. But I am definitely super straight and there shouldn't be anything wrong with it either. To be honest I don't mind if some feminist get angry about it, it's kind of funny, because I need to keep up with all their nonsense as well.

The blame isn't directed to us as individuals, but to us a part of a collective identity of 'white', or 'straight', or 'male'. Oppression isn't merely historic. It is better now than it used to be, but it has not disappeared. Black people are still being murdered by white police kneeling on their necks. Ethnic Chinese in western countries are being assaulted because of an imagined link to Covid19.
And it's not so much 'blame' as a caution to be vigilant against racism. Similar to how an uprising of nationalism is more troubling if it comes from Germany... historical context informs the present. Doesn't mean that you, as a random person in Germany, wants to bring back the Third Reich.


Positive discrimination is a clumsy and flawed method, but with a laudable aim. There are much better approaches used in certain industries, for example some orchestras are conducting _(sorry) blind auditions. It is better not to specifically hire the black/female candidate because they are black/female, but to have a process in place whereby gender and ethnicity are removed from the interviewer's consideration. Orchestras is obviously a limited example, but it shows it can be done.

That's not really how this works. If a TV show can make you gay I'm gonna guess that you were never straight to begin with.

Putting a giant 10 minute gay porn scene in the middle of my favorite show is disgusting and that's exactly what they are doing, telling me to become a gay person. I do skip these scenes though doing it almost every episode becomes, tiring.

I am not telling other people how to live their lives, I want them to not tell me how to live mine.

Fuck netflix

I wouldn't say oppressed, rather blamed.

If you are a straight white male, there is a discourse that blames you for the oppression that historically blacks, women, homosexuals, etc. have suffered, even if you have never discriminated against anyone and you are against it. This is done from political positions from the left.


Positive discrimination is discrimination at the end of the day, because you end up choosing a less prepared candidate not because of his merits but for those reasons I mentioned before, that I have to pay today for what some morons with whom I do not identify did in the past. I don't agree with that being a greater cause.

[/quote]

Perks are needed to ccompensate man-made inequality, within reason. Trans people are as sick as everyone. Do you think you do not have any mental issue? Then, that is your first mental issue. You have your views, that is fine, just do not try to impose those views on others. Is the same  for those who think that everyone is in some way gay or that gender identity should define your life.

The bottom problem is the same with football, religion, politics,... This is about people who can learn to live with others that are different and those who can´t. And this also goes for Lesbians who hate man, gays who hate women, Muslims that hate Christians, Christians that hate everything that is not them and such a long etc...

Your first mistake is to label yourself to prove a point, which is the only reason I can think for being "super straight". Why don´t you try with "Straight Maximalist", it sounds even better.

I'm a straight, white male. Show me the data.
Unless you mean less than 50% of the population is white male? Which, given the approximately equal gender split, means you'd only need say a 1% non-white element for white males to drop below 50% of the population. But still by far the most powerful ethnicity and gender.

Have a look at current senators, and then tell me that white males are oppressed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_senators
And here's a breakdown of supreme court judges by ethnicity and gender: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/25/politics/supreme-court-justice-minorities-history-trnd/index.html
Yes, I would have a problem with 'rights for whites'. Come back to me when whites are forced to sit at the back of the bus or work the plantation, and I'll join the resistance.

Positive discrimination is a different issue. It's an attempt to right systemic wrongs, but obviously has consequences for individuals. If I went up for a job, scored the same on the assessment as a black candidate, and lost the job because the employer wants to address their ethnic balance, then would I feel aggrieved? Yes, probably. But if we are balancing an individual against the whole society, then society should win. My loss would be a win for the greater cause.

Agreed.

As for the last paragraph, don't know how to respond and not particularly keen to quote it.

Every time I hear about how "the gays" are turning more people gay or in this case, "the trannies" are recruiting more people, I am reminded of these data:



See if you can guess roughly where we stopped forcing left handed people to write with their right hands. There have always been ~12% of people who are left hand dominant. All that changed is society's attitude towards them.

Straight white males are now the systemically oppressed, the most so in 50 years..
All else have all sorts of advantages, and it’s ridiculous..

You would have a problem with a movement labeled “rights for whites” wouldn’t you?
How about a United white college fund? How about universities and companies openly stating that they should hire less of everything other than whites?


The KKK?
The KKK is a pathetic and weak organization compared to BLM and antifa who are currently destroying cities..
I can hardly believe the KKK is even worthy of consideration..


Trannies are to be pitied the same as most any other debilitating condition/disability..
They are obviously the least attractive to most.. Some traps may draw some attention, but only for a small percentage of their life while their still very young.. Will likely suicide once some age catches up to them..
I feel sorry for them all, but angered at the attempted normalization and recruitment of it..

Bigots and oppression, yes, this is the root of it. 'Super straight' isn't about an oppressed minority group seeking a voice and recognition. 'Super straight' is a response to those seeking a voice. It's an attempt at oppression. Exactly the same as 'all lives matter'. And exactly the same as if the Klan rebranded themselves as 'rights for whites'.

It's a negative dressed up as a positive, that's all this is.
It's 'we don't like lesbian/gay/trans/etc' dressed up as 'straights are people too!'
And this is revealed by the need to differentiate 'super straight' from 'straight'... it's 'straight' but with an added element of 'we don't like people who aren't straight'.

I'm saying something about bigots being so prejudiced that the very people they are trying to oppress are unlikely to want much to do with them.

Also, "even trannies"? Are "trannies" somehow a lower class of person? They should be grateful for any attention us normal people give them?

Perks??
How about not..

Trans are mentally ill with very real and dangerous mental health and physical health risks..
Suicide rates off the charts often due to regret, body mutilating surgeries, hormone therapies with terrible life long side effects often being used on children, and worse..

This is not something that should be celebrated and promoted as cool and popular..

In no way should those who dare to speak of these consequences be harassed and labeled as bigots, much less those who refuse to engage in relationships with them..

The propaganda is pushing this to kids as a cool and popular thing to do for attention creating an incredibly dangerous fad with often severe consequences..

Whoever protects, promotes, encourages, or enables this vary from spineless to downright sick, encouraging the destruction of lives..



Lesbians are overwhelmed with “trans men” larping as lesbians..

Your trying to say something about traditionalists being so unattractive that even trannies would want nothing to do with them? Lol ok

Are you aware that that eye-opening supernew and supercool narrative was the Middle Age narrative in a twitter feed? Nobody is telling you how to live your life, so just stop telling others how to live theirs.


The rule of law is not a concession from the men to the women and equality before the law is not the rule of Darwinism.


I think that there is no need whatsoever to classify, that sexual identities are not a thing and that everyone should be free to do whatever they feel as long as there is mutual consent among all the parties involved.

The whole debates makes little sense. I am tired of being fed with news about women doing stuff because I already know they do and can do stuff. Yes, everyone should be equal before the law, have the same opportunities and perhaps some gender discriminatory legal protection and perks if that is needed for their safety and progress. I do not need to hear about it, I do not need to hear "superstraights" crap on how superior they feel nor how gays like to do stuff on different holes or play scissors.

On a modern society, this should not even be a debate. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Oh, and yes I know, in half of Latin-America, large bits of Russia, many Muslim countries and the best part of Africa and in the US Bible belt they still live in the middle ages on this aspect, so all I ask is for them to keep their shit to themselves.

The perpetually offended are simply mirroring the hidden offence that they carry within themselves.

And that's what I've been saying. Thank you. Super straight is a straight to the point insult for those people with preference not liking same gender and thinking already that they're transphobic or something.

And referring to this generations line of thinking with regards to being offended. Yes they're really sensitive and want social validation for anything they does. But not all of this generations people are like that, most of them comes from social media people who had been growing with that kind of environment.

Isn't it the culutre these days to be offended? I think for many people the internet is just here to have arguments with complete strangers. So many people are getting triggered these days online and invest a lot of time just to try and convince others of their opinion. The problem is that we will never listen to complete strangers online. Honestly, we should be bigger than that and just try to be positive. There is no reason to fight over sexualities. Everbody has the right to be happy and identify as what he wants, so calling someone out as transphobic is not right.

I think the root of this is fear of the Other. Homophobia, racism, any sort of bigotry, have the same underlying basis.

Human society is often Us vs Them. 'Them' is a threat, and has been back to the time of paleolithic hunter-gatherer tribes, and I'd imagine early than that, back through our hominin ancestry. And of course it has served rulers throughout history, from tribal chiefs and kings and warlords right through to modern governments, to deflect attention/blame from their own shortcomings onto the convenient scapegoat of the outsider who doesn't have a voice to defend themselves. 'They' are always to blame. Brexit. Mexicans. Black people. Gay people. etc. etc.

And any exposure to this Other serves to peel away a part of the illusion. Which is why the most racist communities are those in 100% white rural areas, why the most ardent homophobes are those who have never met an openly gay person, etc.

They maybe thinking about the possible outcomes in future events. What this may cause and how will it affect them. As they think about it, they started to have somehow concern related to the topic thus start the conversation.

And I don't think that this male gender they referred as the "SuperStraight" to be the one to recommend and add it to the LGBTQ. As a matter of fact, based on the description, it is like a tease to those straight men to be called superstraight.

Shhh! We don't want people to figure out that you sent me some deadly mist, and shortly afterwards a deadly virus spread by aerosols (i.e. mist) encompassed the entire globe. Otherwise they'll figure out that we are in cahoots to put the 5Gates microchip in the entire world!

And now you want to send me a radioactive bobcat? Hope everyone has got their tinfoil hats bodysuits ready.

---

Somewhat back on topic, but I've never understood why there are people just sitting at home getting angry thinking about other people's genitals or sexual preference. Do you have nothing better to do with your time?

I'll bet one of the unclaimed mystery boxes I still have lying around from the Vulpine Order of Merit. This one contains a live bobcat (as mystery boxes sometimes do), as well as an experimental apparatus containing a caesium-137 radiation source and an untested Monsanto product. This a new experimental design intended to remove sampling bias from controlled trials, developed by Monsanto and later abandoned when they realised that scientific studies don't hold up in court, which is how I got this box so cheap. I'm sure it'll go nice with the other Monsanto box I gave you. As always, open with care.

No bet. It's probably already happening on one of the chans.

EDIT: Typo

This is going to fly like a lead balloon.

Deal. I'll bet the schematics for the secret microchip that we've actually been smuggling in to all the COVID vaccines. I expect an equally juicy stake from you.

How about a bet on how long it will take someone to declare themselves "super white"?

Super Straight: The New "Transphobic" Sexuality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENADjeOXYcA

Probably all incels right?

You're on. I give it six months, a year at the most, before a moderately-sized scandal erupts involving a semi-famous "super straight" person being caught having a secret sexual relationship with a trans person (assuming this "super straight" fad even lasts that long). It's as inevitable as ardent homophobes turning out to be secretly gay. (Never underestimate the ability of hateful bigots to somehow manage to score dates with people they openly claim to hate.)

I would also wager that anyone who would label themselves "super straight" in real life will never find themselves in a situation where a trans person might want to sleep with them.

I don't think those people are even ready to understand just a bit of what "super straight" means and trash it immediately. I don't think you can even start a conversation regarding this topic with them.

Though I would like to see if there is a significant relationship with those two variables. I wonder.

That is true for those who support this extremist movement that has polluted public discourse.If they want the full brunt of what it truly means to be equal they must face the same survival of the fittest brutal nature of what it means to survive in the most hostile places.Weak men who are disadvantaged by a lack of physical strength or other characteristics are being discriminated against when they have to face other stronger men on the battlefield,prison yard,boxing ring,rugby pitch etc so if the sluice gates are to be opened then they should will be opened fully and these extremists will reap what they sow but unfortunately they will bring forth the misery they release upon the heads of all decent women also.

It is only because of the merciful nature of men towards the weaker sex that this does not happen but if the extremists brainwash all women eventually then mercy will no longer show its face and women will reap what they sow.This is the unfortunate scenario men and women are faced with as the provocateurs are left go unchecked and unchallenged.

They want to be equals when it benefits them and not when it doesn't. Classic SJW hypocrisy.

If women are deemed equal to men then the real argument regarding quotas to be filled should start at the bottom.There should be equal representation of bodies on the front line in any future conflicts.Similiar quotas should be met down coal mines etc.Women should no longer get special treatment when the ship is sinking as it is now discriminatory to men to have women and children be placed in the life boats first (you see where this is going).

There should no longer be any female prisons and all genders should be accommodated in the same manner as it is discriminatory and apartheid to have separate facilities.There should no longer be male or female only sports,dressing/changing rooms,lavatories/toilets etc as this is aparteid and discriminatory.


....you see,as you reap you should expect to sow.Hypocrisy and not vanity is the greatest sin as partial and selective truths are but a lie.I cannot lie

~infinite wisdom V humanity's infantile brains  

I wonder if there's a correlation between people who identify as 'super straight', and people whose response to BLM is 'all lives matter'.
I would assume there's pretty much a 100% match. Probably a bit difficult to acquire data on this, but perhaps if someone is willing to go to Washington and stand outside the Capitol with a clipboard, ready to question 'passers by' the next time it's stormed, we might get some interesting information.

It does seem a bit of a 'What about me? I'm not a minority but I'm important too! Stop focusing on oppressed people/groups!' kind of thing.

Yeah imagine that, how to turn your coworkers and boss against you in 3 seconds. I mean he couldn't really fire you for it, because you are protected by law. But still I wouldn't want to see how the performance talks are going to look like and you will probably not getting any bonus for that year. This is just creating such a huge mess.

And now it seems that super straight is already banned from TikTok. Probably only a matter of weeks until Twitter and Facebook will do the same.

Say what you want about Trump, but I am forever grateful the leader of one of the largest countries did not legitimize transgender delusion like suggesting that transwomen are women and that they should be allowed into real women's locker rooms, or into women's sports.

This is the bit I find weird. If I find someone attractive I'm going with that.
Do people of the 36+ sexes out there that have always existed have to declare that on the first date (as soon as you meet them)? (eg it's possible for the dna for testes to be added to the end of an X chromsome.

---

I'm glad the topic was made here by someone tbh. Most of the people arguing about this on tiktok are likely minors who haven't fully developed much of an understanding. And tbh I felt the same about 6 months ago in case someone wanted to have kids or something (but that's kinda been turned into something that's ableism by some parts of the community).


This looks like sexual assault at the very least it feels iffy.


That isn't socialism or the American definition of liberalism either. A socialist ideology seeks to level everyone and is so far functioning well enough to have only one country still using it (North Korea).
I'd like to say we're making progress in equality in this world but we're really not... Taking a different name and gender on paper might be a great way to reduce the pay gap (7% of ceos of the top 100 companies are women, in the S&P500 it's about 14%). I think people have also been hammering into people for too long that they're being discriminated against to a point where they're beginning to accept nothing will ever change...

the patriarchy is and was the worst thing to happen to capitalism the idea of men inheriting everything gives them as little to hope for as it does women being told they don't have a place in business. I don't want inefficiency when I can have innovation.

Does this mean that when your (hypothetical) daughter tells you that there's a boy in her school who always follows girls into the ladies room because he thinks he's one of them, you'll say it's all fine because he should be allowed to be who he wants to be?

try that in the workplace
boss: "good morning ladies and gentlemen"
jeff: "boss dont call me a gentleman. im an aggressive trans using pronouns 'them'"
boss: "well dont call me boss either. call me 'the person that pays your wage if you get on with your work'"
jeff: "dont tell me what to do.. im not a slave"
boss: "well 'them' is not listed on my payroll, so your right. so as a free person you can go home and find another job"

I think it's a good idea. Why not fight with the same weapons? If people ask for new gender constantly we should be allowed to do the same. I have no problem with the LGBTQ community, there only problem I have is that people want to be something specials. Everybody should be allowed to have his own beliefs. And if someone only beliefs in male and female, why call him transphobic? Just let everybody live in peace without violence.

Yeah but some of you peeps are going to have to mail Ray a badge for it or it don't count 

anyway.
while the BTQ want to 'convert' straights to Q in america
the LGBTQ community in the UK want the government to ban psychotherapy of 'conversion' (tries to make LGBTQ straight.)

as i said. im all for freedom to be whomever you are.. but trying to convert others.. big no no.. on both sides

im not even america.. i have no side in american politics. but as an outsider. i can see clearly the division between the two camps

by the way seems you dont understand communism either.. but ill let you waste years before you dig yourself out of that hole.

and um..
in trumps tenure. he sanctioned mass bombings of loads of random places.
the recent biden sanctioned syrian bombing was a strategic strike that hit the exact target it wanted. trumps 'aim' is much poorer. hitting random things.

you are in that camp that is lucid dreaming. but aware that its dream. pretending your woke and in control.
sorry dude but your still in fantasy land. wake up
yes your dream is different to the extremist dreams of the BTQ nightmare. but you are still dreaming

Franky, I get that you are a commie Xiden lover but take a deep breath and think logically for a moment.

Trump wasn't the perfect dude for everybody (by everybody I mean both the Americans and everybody else), but Xiden is much worse.

Now the bombings has started in Syria again I guess Biden is the strongest candidate of the next Nobel Peace Prize.

put in place in favour of capitalists
maybe you skipped the lesson about what freemarket is
capitalists dont want self regulation. they want governments to stop freemarkets of the underclass so that the capitalists can capitalise(monopolise)
.
anyway. seems your not ready to learn what capitalism is.
lets go back to sticking on topic as it seem its will take forever for you to get this point

That’s Darwinism..

patents, copyrights, and brand licenses are forms of government regulation..
Do you agree with them? Or no?

mindrust. i get it your a trumpette. and want to defend your fan loyalism of trump..

but put your fannyism aside. just for one moment.
trump didnt really do anything to 'make america great again' for any gender.
he just played the fanbase and loyalism card to say trendy things.
he was hypocritical. he would say one trendy thing to one demograph and another trendy thing to another demograph. where the things oppose each other. .. but he done it to win people over by trends and fame

EG
'liberate your state'. wins the liberals.
'call in the national guard' wins the moderates
'build the wall' wins the conservatives

'protest cause disruption' ...... a guy protests
'theres a guy causing disruption. in the old days you know what id like to.. do punch him'

how can someone want to say liberate a city but then call in the national guard on them very people
how can someone say he is open to international relation.. then close the borders.. build a wall 
its like saying
'get out of prison.. here is your new bigger prison.. escape the prison.. get arrested and go back to prison'

he has you trumpettes chasing your own tail. hoping that because he done nothing for 4 years that really helped. maybe that help will come if you just stay loyal for another 8 years.
well if thats you..keep spinning.. you wont be helped

How many of those gender classifying shit heads voted for Trump exactly? I'll give you a number: Zero.

They are all coming from the left.

Trump opened lots of people's eyes. Even the non-Americans. Socialism, Liberalism, Communism these are the diseases people should get rid of forever or else they won't stop till they turn everybody into a LGBT...

capitalism.. the promise of freemarket.. .. but not for those at the bottom of the pyramid
..you are kind of getting it.. those at the top of the pyramid dont require government.
those at the top are free.. but you dont understand the small print of capitalism. those at the bottom feed those at the top.
remember capitalism is patents, copyrights, brand licences.. so they want government to surpress those at the bottom

free market is the promise that if you lil boys grow up big and strong and you claw your way up to the top. then when your at the top you can be set free. its not freedom for all. i hope you learn that sooner rather than later

libertarianism is about no government... no walls. no borders.. wild west/outlaw true free market for all
capitalism is taking from the bottom, even government taxes end up with corps (trickle down false promise)
socialism is governments work for the people 'taking from the elites and giving to the poor'
communism is where government suck from corp and citizens  to only benefit those in politics

anyways yes this is getting off topic. but please dont waste time trying to defend capitalism.. well not unless you are a CEO already

FREE market capitalism is what naturally happens in the lack of authoritarianism..
Capitalism requires no authority, while socialism (and beyond) does..

This is getting off topic..

capitalism is the central point. the upperclass.
capitalism is corporate authoritarianism
capitalism is the centre of attention. top of the pyramid. sucking energy and money out of those at the bottom.

(hint: capital of a country is its power house. its centre of government and control)

i really do hope you learn this soon.

being social. is about happy open communication
being liberal is about relaxing the rules

please try to learn how the real world works. or you will end up being the bottom of the pyramid puppet handing everything you have to the capitalists.. whilst they tell you 'one day my boy, you can be where i am' leaving you endlessly at the bottom. with only the 'hope' and 'dream' of a capitalist life

dont get played.

Capitalism is freedom.. Voluntary trade..

What I’m talking about is authoritarianism..
LGBT greatly advances the cause of the authoritarians who wish to control the entire world under one world government..
LGBT is a great tool of the destruction of free speech, cancel culture, and protecting certain classes..

You don’t see the big picture..


True “equality” is anarchism/Darwinism/capitalism..

Social/liberal people want equal OUTCOME! Not equal opportunity..
But what they don’t even realize is that they are just a tool of NWO one world government..

They don’t even see it..
They think their just battling against liberty for all up to a certain point, but they are advancing towards the agendas of those who wish for complete and utter control of all..

seems you dont understand socialism/liberalism
..
you do realise its capitalism that meets the definitions you speak of

yep slavery was capitalism
weaken and destabilize.. thats capitalism


they are playing by the capitalism handbook

social/liberal people want equality and unity
capitalism want warring factions both feeding funds to central groups

im all for LGBTQ just being whomever they want to be and just getting on with their lives... thats the acceptable crowd that are the liberal/social lot.

but the BTQ crowd pointing fingers at straights and making slogans. brands and motto's trying to drum up fame and recognition while selling accessories and seeking donations for their campaigns.. thats the capitalist group thats going extreme and causing debate and argument.

No, it’s “them”..
trying to weaken and destabilize us, push us further towards government dependency and farther away from our old moralities, so they can more easily and efficiently enslave us..

LGBT would vote our free speech right away for their “protection” from being offended.. In so many places they wail jail you for such speech as “trans women aren’t real women”, and they are allies of such.. Erode our liberties..
They’d also vote our gun rights away in a flash in exchange for whatever they want..

It also splits up families and destroys the traditional family structure, further making people dependent on government instead of their families, and weakening us as a people against a central power..

Just another trick up “their” sleeve to control us..

Look.. All of the media, school systems, universities, etc. are pushing the lgbt narrative..
100% propaganda..

Serves their cause well..

its not socialist/liberal
this insanity was birthed due to the internet era. where being different became fashionable

socialism governments have been around for centuries. as have liberal governments.
if anything. if you wanted to point a political finger.. id say its capitalism

think about it. one group fighting for superiority. pretending those not in the club are beneath them and closed minded. trying to create a fanbase and sell trendy brands and have slogans and banners..
seeking acceptance and conformity to their brand..

its not just about males wear blue and woman wear pink and LGBTQ wear tie-die.. now it has to be rainbow flags, law changes and everything.
im all for uniqueness and independance and the right to be whomever you want to be. but trying to 'gay' everyone. thats definitely capitalism

I think we are now experiencing the peak of the socialist/liberal insanity and they won't stop till they fuck us all in the ass.

I would have to agree with you on this one.

Having a gender-neutral birth certificate is really just stupid, and there is plenty of time for parents to decide to accept their child's gender for what it is. Teaching young children that they "want" to be another gender is where the abuse is.

the issue i see is that some people question their gender and spend years stressed not knowing their identity.. and now all a sudden instead of just saying. 'no one cares.. just get on with your life and be happy' EVERYONE that was sure of their gender is suppose to question their gender suddenly.

seems like a certain community want to feel normal by making everyone else confused. so that confusion is the new normal..
sorry but thats just stupid.
how about realise no one actually cares about someone elses sexual preference. in the real world people dont walk up to a cashier and say 'who did you have sex with last night'
normal real world conversations with random people dont work like that. no one cares who they sleep with outside the workplace. or at the grocery store.
its not part of normal real world introduction conversations

when i talk to people i can tell the difference between 2 people by their height and haircolour. i dont need to investigate or ask about their sexual preference just to identify them

sorry but if parents want to put their kid into a headspin for the rest of their life by saying 'you have no gender' and start dressing (what doctors know to be a boy) in pink dresses.. is then the parents abusing their kid

forcing a kid to question their gender.. is abuse

This will be insufficient in about 20 years. Several states allow for birth certificates to be gender-neutral.

I don't think it is unreasonable for someone to have a preference as to if their partner has ever changed genders.

"These people" didn't think this through, did they?


You posted it on the shitcoining board... no one reads that, not even shitcoiners themselves.

And he didn't break anything, not yet anyway. There are still unclaimed ~800-bit challenges and IIRC current recommended key size is 2048 or 4096 or something in that range.

because everyone has a gender.. but no one has ethereum

Lot of ridiculous spin trying to convince anyone that trans women are real women..

Exactly why all these people are calling themselves “SuperStraight”, so they have an argument against being a “transphobe”, and can possibly escape cancel culture..
It’s only playing their own game...

Myself, I lean more towards just being “straight” and holding the opinion that trans women are not real women..
If I get called a “homophobe” I’ll just admit that they creep me out..

I find the logic of the super movement quite interesting..


Another thing I find very interesting is that I can make posts here about Schnorr’s recent paper claiming to have broken all RSA encryption, and get zero analytical replies about it, yet, I can make a post on this forum about gender nonsense, and I get analysis down to what specs are in period blood.. (as if mtf trans actually have periods)

Slight correction: A human egg cell can measure up to 120 microns in diameter (0.12 mm), which is indeed visible with the naked eye! I know this because I always request that prospective sexual partners menstruate in to a suitable container which I can rummage around in to identify the ovum prior to copulation. Although once I mistook a speck of dust for the aforementioned gamete, so I don't think I can call myself SuperStraight anymore. Or maybe because of all the orgies. Who knows?

the trend of #superstraight is to cause conflict of saying
straight: admitting your bi or questioning (BQ)
superstraight: admitting your homophobe and want LGBTQ to die(facepalm)

yep its the 'straight is the new bi' nonsense. or the non-LGBTQ are murderers

its done to make it into an argument that straight people have to admit they are bi or sexist.

in my view straight is straight.. bi is bi.  there is a difference. straight is not bi
those people questioning if they are straight already have a acronym letter.. Q(questioning)

yet the LGBTQ community hope that they can be fluid and pretend they are above all the drama and conflict, while they are the ones creating the conflict. hense the term political.. in political correctness.
(politicians stand above the conflict while causing the conflict)

.. basically trying to make LGBTQ people seem superior by pointing fingers at non LGBTQ people and calling them out as flawed people that need to be managed.

in my view its the BTQ community that are flawed by trying to do these things as they are attacking the LG people more so than straight people.

much like trump attacking his own republican reps that didnt jump on the trump waggon. hurting his own community more

No good; those are based on nothing more than a cursory inspection of a baby's genitalia, and we already have a word for people whose sexual attraction is based on looking at baby genitals. No, biological sex is all about the number and size of your gametes. It's an unusual bodily characteristic to be attracted to, if only because gametes can't be observed with the naked eye, but if semen analysis and ovarian function tests are what gets your motor going, then who am I to judge?



(Yes, this also means that everyone who's sterile for any reason whatsoever is biologically sexless or "neuter", which is one of the reasons why we don't normally use biological sex to categorise humans, but how else is OP supposed to weed out the unattractive people?)

So in definition, "superstraight" is someone who will die just not to have sex with same birth sex, while straight is someone who loves opposite sex but has the possibility to have sex with same birth sex for some definite reasons, like money.

But isn't it just another confusion for the mass, like what if he is "Super straight" and mistakenly had sex with a transwoman, then just knows afterwards that and became homophobic after. Isn't he become only "Straight" as he is now known to be transphobic/homophobic because of the incident?

sounds like a move to bring out the LGBTQ community's inner hypocrisy and it is definitely working. not that they aren't already. the community has become so toxic that they would criticize people that only have a certain preference on who they want to date or have sex with.

its all just teeny trend making. ..
new fashion craze of trying to be the next "original thought" person of the next acronym letter.
a decade ago they wanted to organise people by harry potter groups

if anyone tries the new trends on me. i just tell them i go by the pronouns
'helicopter, chopper, swirly whirly bird' and leave them to try to remember to use them correctly and without argument. they get the hint that using their requested pronouns is just as much unsociable and used just to wait for other person to get it wrong to argue and scowl at them for not being woke
they learn quick

i got nothing against people having their own preferences and not wanting to just be labelled as certain things.
but trying to pigeon hole people into categories and labels and then arguing with everyone about not psychicly recognising their preference on first introduction. well thats just 'drama for trends' and completely hypocritical

i dont go around telling everyone im straight. its not a subject that needs to be discussed with everyone.
its not how normal people introduce themselves in everyday conversation
the younger generation seem to be stuck in the internet chatroom 'speak' where the first intro is usually age/gender/location. and they cant understand how real life social interactions work

you know. you say a joke. they dont even smile. no giggle. but they say LOL
all these silly things are linked.

true people wanting to be free to express themselves and have different preferences to the archiac norms. should just stop wasting time with trending labels..  and just live their lives

“SuperStraight/SuperLesbian” is a reductio ad absurdum logic response that basically flips the entire field of gender studies on its head..

They made up all this nonsense and now are BTFO by their own game..

#SometimesStraight

Where does #superstraight put people like this:

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51xfe8dEJoL._AC_UX569_.jpg

fixed that for you

if 'they'(pronoun) think that straight men should date trans.. then 'they' need to remove LG because 'they' dont want people to have gender preference

'they' are basically throwing out 40% of their community acronym for not being fluid enough

Precisely. You actually make them sign a legally binding agreement before any sort of sexual contact. Template has actually been attached to this post for your convenience.

Not sure why anyone spends any time getting all worked up about new identities and such. I’ll do me over here and you can do you over there.

So how does it work, do you ask for a birth certificate before engaging into any kind of coupling?

A new gender identity has been invented called “SuperStraight” putting an S into the LGBTQ alphabet..
It basically means that you are only attracted to a natural born member of the opposite sex..
“Straights” have long been criticized and labeled “transphobic” for not wanting to date transsexuals.
Well, it turns out that “superstraight” is just another sexual identity..
Turns out their are also many many “SuperLesbians” and “SuperGays” coming out now aswell now that the discovery of this new sexual identity has been made..
They already have a flag and a symbol..

The problem is that many of the LGBTQ community are mad about it, but who are they to question the sexual identity of anyone else?

What do YOU think?




“ A Community for Oppressed Men & Women that consider their Sexuality/Gender/Religion to be “Super Straight” Super Straight: A Sexuality meant to describe Male or Female that is only Attracted to the opposite biological Sex/Gender. #SuperStraight 🛎Not transphobic or homophobic🛎 ”
https://www.reddit.com/r/SuperStraight/