Topic: Support flag against ANYONE Project, refusal to paid some participants. - page 2. (Read 774 times)

I supported the flag.

Looks like the BM did not escrow the money and since the team had the funds and right to distribute, they choose to pay a handful of participants and reject the remaining. It's the mistake of the BM also as the BM is not so reputed and did not put pressure on the team to pay the participants. The person who manages the team should have the authority to make sure that participants are paid. This is a red mark on the BM too irrespective of the team being a scam.

I supported this one, they should be liable to pay to their participants if they promise to do so.
There might be a little misunderstanding here but everything should get cleared through sensible talk.
They should think the wasted efforts of their participants just because of a little misunderstanding.

If this is the case the it's an issue in between the dev team and BM. There were nothing wrong from the participants. I hope they resolve the issue. Supported the flag OP. Thanks for bringing it in here.

Supported this one yet I'm also one of the participants that haven't received the payment.Its totally unfair for those who removed signatures yet its already being permitted by campaign manager itself and now the pay day comes,the team skipped out those who haven't wear their sigs.

BM do definitely had the mistake on here since the removal of signature isn't still approved by the team or they should clarify it first while the campaign is ongoing or saying it on OP in the first place.

AnyoneLtd has broken a written contract and your flag is correct. Supported although the weight isn't much since I'm not a DT.

Off topic
You are a senior member of the forum, why don't you ask team to escrow the fund or if they have problem with escrow fund, why a senior member like you have promoted the project?

Flag supported my friend. They’re keen to get lots of people to promote for them but not so keen to pay everybody.

 

AnyoneLTD hired Nekoma2018 to carryout a paid bitcoin promotional campaign for a duration of 2weeks (link: ANYONE LIMITED 2 Btc giveaway bounty campaign) after a successful campaign, the campaign manager approved the removal of signature ads for participants of the signature campaign by then he has already awarded each user their appropriate total stakes for wearing the signature ads successful for 1 or  2 weeks.

Coming to the week of payment, the developer of the project took over the spreadsheet from the campaign manager and started disqualifying participants as he feels. Before now the terms and conditions of the campaign didn't demand participants to wear the signature until payment has been received. Signature campaign requirements Achieve: http://archive.is/Nm8fF

But from a total of 40 (Signature campaign) participants, just 13 participants wear paid by the developer just because they were still wearing the signature ads after the campaign was over. Spreadsheet Archived, Link: http://archive.is/BOyIK Users paid are marked blue.
Remember the campaign manager gave a go ahead to participates to remove our signatures on numerous occasions since the allocation of stakes were over and duration of campaign was also over. I even confirmed via PM
.

Every participants of this campaign including the manager can testify to my statement above. At first we presume this to be a simple misunderstanding between the campaign manager and developers of project but as time went on, it became clearer, the project has intentionally refused to pay most signature participants because the feel the campaign generally wasn't successful. Although the signature campaign was identified as the most successful (by the manager) from other campaign, still we became victim while other campaign participants were paid. I was also affected irrespective of my stakes been marked green (quality participant) but this isn't about me, this scam accusation is made on behalf of all the signature participants that are been denial of their payment after dedicating their time to promoting this project on the forum.

I consider this act by the project to be shady and scam related therefore I have created a type 2 flag against their account on the forum to warn other members from falling victim as the project might decide to trick users into promoting them without getting paid in future.

Support my flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=547

I'm new to this so if I'm not doing it right, feel free to correct me.