Pages:
Author

Topic: Surprise: Government has been wrong about cholesterol for 40 years - page 2. (Read 2206 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Also cholesterol maybe ok for most people, but not so good for others. The same can be said for salt, sugar alcohol, caffeine. 
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well there was always LDL and HDL
I think they just did a poor job of defining which one was the evil one and which one was good for you
That said nice to see Cholesterol getting back its useful rep and it does make you wonder how they could keep getting it wrong for so long
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
Now all they need to do is say cigarettes and copious amounts of alcohol is ok and I've got the perfect lifestyle Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/02/10/feds-poised-to-withdraw-longstanding-warnings-about-dietary-cholesterol/


The nation’s top nutrition advisory panel has decided to drop its caution about eating cholesterol-laden food, a move that could undo almost 40 years of government warnings about its consumption.

The group’s finding that cholesterol in the diet need no longer be considered a “nutrient of concern” stands in contrast to the committee’s findings five years ago, the last time it convened. During those proceedings, as in previous years, the panel deemed the issue of excess cholesterol in the American diet a public health concern.

The finding follows an evolution of thinking among many nutritionists who now believe that, for healthy adults, eating foods high in cholesterol may not significantly affect the level of cholesterol in the blood or increase the risk of heart disease.




Cholesterol Is Not a ‘Nutrient of Concern,’ Report Says


Experts say this would mean that recommendations are finally catching up with the evidence, which suggests that dietary cholesterol bears little impact on a person’s risk of heart disease.

“There have been multiple analyses and meta-analyses now looking at intake of dietary cholesterol and the risk of heart disease,” says Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of the School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. “In the general population, there’s really not any strong evidence for a link.” However, a few studies have shown that there may be increased risk in people with type-2 diabetes, he says.



http://time.com/3705734/cholesterol-dietary-guidelines/


The shameful history of government, health industry, and media vilification of the egg:
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/28/breaking-eggs-not-bad-for-you-and-the-nyt-is-on-it/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a week for science! First, no big bang, the universe was always there. Now eating eggs is good for you. What's next?

 Smiley

Pages:
Jump to: