Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1522.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: bbxx on September 30, 2013, 05:33:35 PM

Quote from: The Avenger on September 30, 2013, 05:29:57 PM

Problem is, they are going to exceed 850w if things go really well. And we all saw those photos of how many 850w PSU's they have!

So they may tune it down to keep it below 850w, just so they don't have to buy 1000's more PSU's.

Discuss.

PSU should operate at 60-80% to get maximum effeciency and cool

they have failed badly lol, should buy 1KW platinum, not crap coolermaster

oh you silly fuck

bbxx

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

cryptoshark

Quote from: The Avenger on September 30, 2013, 05:29:57 PM

Problem is, they are going to exceed 850w if things go really well. And we all saw those photos of how many 850w PSU's they have!

So they may tune it down to keep it below 850w, just so they don't have to buy 1000's more PSU's.

Discuss.

PSU should operate at 60-80% to get maximum effeciency and cool

they have failed badly lol, should buy 1KW platinum, not crap coolermaster

DPoS

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: the-skeptic on September 30, 2013, 05:28:32 PM

Ahh, ok. But my theory still stands. The HW error rate isn't reflected in the 100% accepted shares listed on the screen. Something doesn't match up.

because it is fake!! they have Josh sitting on a Minirig behind that wall - his butt is blocking the exhaust which is why the error rate is so high.. but he loves the hot air so it's worth it

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: The Avenger on September 30, 2013, 05:29:57 PM

Problem is, they are going to exceed 850w if things go really well. And we all saw those photos of how many 850w PSU's they have!

So they may tune it down to keep it below 850w, just so they don't have to buy 1000's more PSU's.

Discuss.

Discuss? There isnt much to discuss. I bought 1000W PSUs cause there is always some room left for overclocking and so additional 150W could be well spent.

AussieHash

hero member

Activity: 692

Merit: 500

Quote from: the-skeptic on September 30, 2013, 05:19:34 PM

I noticed the HW error rate, but the results of accepted shares in the screen don't jibe. I suspect the HW errors were valid shares that were not properly submitted because they are running the jupiter off of a Macbook and not its internal mining software. I suspect they are messing with settings right now, which is leading to the wide swings in hash rate their pool stats are displaying.

Code:

	Hashrate Average	Weighted Shares	
	3 hours		422.32 Gh/s	1061955
	22.5 minutes	457.32 Gh/s	143744
	256 seconds	527.54 Gh/s	31444	
	128 seconds	572.63 Gh/s	17066

The Avenger

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Problem is, they are going to exceed 850w if things go really well. And we all saw those photos of how many 850w PSU's they have!

So they may tune it down to keep it below 850w, just so they don't have to buy 1000's more PSU's.

Discuss.

achimsmile

legendary

Activity: 1225

Merit: 1000

FYI, I watched the video and wrote down the user adress on eligius. This is it:

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17Czc8RVL3FU5T2MLx2zLbRnpfBNgH9vFo

Average seems to be well below 500GH/s... Of course they are probably just testing and fiddling around with it.

edit: it's climbing over 500 now

the-skeptic

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

Quote from: ASIC-K on September 30, 2013, 05:21:54 PM

Quote from: the-skeptic on September 30, 2013, 05:19:34 PM

I noticed the HW error rate, but the results of accepted shares in the screen don't jibe. I suspect the HW errors were valid shares that were not properly submitted because they are running the jupiter off of a Macbook and not its internal mining software. I suspect they are messing with settings right now, which is leading to the wide swings in hash rate their pool stats are displaying.

no they are running off the beaglebone not the macbook.

Ahh, ok. But my theory still stands. The HW error rate isn't reflected in the 100% accepted shares listed on the screen. Something doesn't match up.

r3animation

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: btc_uzr on September 30, 2013, 05:25:24 PM

Quote from: eurgbp2011 on September 30, 2013, 05:13:19 PM

also see how many % of HW Errors they are doing, number is huge

You know I face the facts, the ugly ones, too - but I'm very happy with it.
Why? because THEY JUST GOT IT UP & RUNNING under incredible time & psycho pressure!

Image you are the guy responsible that the f'ing hashrate finally goes above some shitty 1% before 23:59.
They did great. As engineer I'm more than impressed - even can't find the right words to express the wow.

edit:
tuning will follow, let's see

Maybe they're testing the Saturn now.

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

Quote from: eurgbp2011 on September 30, 2013, 05:13:19 PM

also see how many % of HW Errors they are doing, number is huge

You know I face the facts, the ugly ones, too - but I'm very happy with it.
Why? because THEY JUST GOT IT UP & RUNNING under incredible time & psycho pressure!

Image you are the guy responsible that the f'ing hashrate finally goes above some shitty 1% before 23:59.
They did great. As engineer I'm more than impressed - even can't find the right words to express the wow.

edit:
tuning will follow, let's see

ASIC-K

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hell?

Quote from: the-skeptic on September 30, 2013, 05:19:34 PM

I noticed the HW error rate, but the results of accepted shares in the screen don't jibe. I suspect the HW errors were valid shares that were not properly submitted because they are running the jupiter off of a Macbook and not its internal mining software. I suspect they are messing with settings right now, which is leading to the wide swings in hash rate their pool stats are displaying.

no they are running off the beaglebone not the macbook.

the-skeptic

member

Activity: 91

Merit: 10

I noticed the HW error rate, but the results of accepted shares in the screen don't jibe. I suspect the HW errors were valid shares that were not properly submitted because they are running the jupiter off of a Macbook and not its internal mining software. I suspect they are messing with settings right now, which is leading to the wide swings in hash rate their pool stats are displaying.

KS

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: dwdoc on September 30, 2013, 05:14:36 PM

The whole world just one shipment apart...

next diff = ROI - 30%.

The Avenger

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: xstr8guy on September 30, 2013, 05:05:20 PM

Well that didn't take long, lol.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Bitcoin-Miner-ASIC-KNC-Jupiter-400-GH-s-/121185860010?pt=COMP_EN_Servers&hash=item1c373d79aa

* not my listing

That's a November delivery order if you look at the price.

Anduck

legendary

Activity: 1511

Merit: 1072

quack

Quote from: toy4lov3rs on September 30, 2013, 05:16:01 PM

Quote from: Syke on September 30, 2013, 04:40:49 PM

Well, if you purchased today:

Bitfury, 400 GH/s, $8000, delivered in Oct.
KnC, 500 GH/s, $4995, delivered in Nov.

This is somewhere between 1 day and two months difference, based on exact delivery dates. Hard to choose

Well, October-delivery h-boards have been shipping already and they've been delivered today. Yeah, in September.. In September though they're marked as October delivery. Cheesy

toy4lov3rs

sr. member

Activity: 375

Merit: 250

Quote from: Syke on September 30, 2013, 04:40:49 PM

Well, if you purchased today:

Bitfury, 400 GH/s, $8000, delivered in Oct.
KnC, 500 GH/s, $4995, delivered in Nov.

This is somewhere between 1 day and two months difference, based on exact delivery dates. Hard to choose

dwdoc

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

- - -Caveat Aleo- - -

The whole world just one shipment apart...

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

Quote from: at141am on September 30, 2013, 05:03:45 PM

I for one am not in the least disappointed!!!

07-01-2013, 01:41 PM #10
BFL_Josh Points (Total)
BFL_Josh is offline
Employee BFL_Josh's Avatar

Blog Entries
   2
Mentioned
   121 Post(s)
Tagged
   0 Thread(s)
Quoted
   1360 Post(s) Follow BFL_Josh On Twitter Add BFL_Josh on Facebook

   If you think KnC is going to have a fully operational ASIC out and shipping in volume by September with those specs, you're almost assuredly bound to be disappointed.

I'm printing it tomorrow as a poster and put it in my office at the wall.
Each time I'm pissed I'll look at this statement from Josh - it will save my day for sure.

eurgbp2011

member

Activity: 101

Merit: 10

also see how many % of HW Errors they are doing, number is huge

KS

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

B+ for the effort anyway. Congrats.

Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1522. (Read 3050071 times)