🍑
Right. but keeping the chances of winning or the track record of both of those slots aside. I am personally interested on your opinion of the design, aesthetics, the animation and the graphical design in general of them.
For example, in a precious lost I talked about how Sweet bonanza looks after the aesthetics of Candy Crush and how that may be very appealing to young gamblers who associate Candy Crush with their childhood or even the elderly who discovered Candy Crush when it was new and popular and now have become gamblers in their golden years.
The opposite can happen as well, that being people getting into candy crush because of Sweet bonanza, but I think it is less likely to happen.
What are you thoughts ?
Both games are visually appealing, so IMO an opinion cannot be based off of that factor alone. When you are gambling and deciding whether or not to continue playing a certain game, you are looking at how often the base game pays, the RTP, how much money you are losing before spinning into a bonus, and how much the bonus pays on average.
If you had $100 to spin on both slots, and started with Sweet Bonanza, you would likely get 2000-2500 spins at $.20 a spin and hit the bonus 5-7 times. Most of those bonuses are going to pay 20x-40x and eventually spin you to a 0 balance.
On gates you are going to average the same numbers as Sweet Bonanza, but your max win potential is much better.
Both are slots by the same provider and no slot is just going to pay pay pay. You have to factor in the potential and the potential on Sweet Bonanza is less. Design has no facotr in my decision.
