Hi and thank you for your reply.
When using the block explorer: http://be.sexcoin.info/chain/Sexcoin then the result is:
stats
Address not seen on the network.
API (machine-readable pages)
Powered by Abe Tips appreciated! SXC LTC
My Sexcoin address starts with S, thats allright and I have sent the coins from cryptopia.
There the status is "completed"
Thanks in advance,
Alex
Topic: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - New Android Client Release! - page 14. (Read 137873 times)
Hi
I created a paper wallet with: https://paperwallet.sexcoin.info/ on tuesday and sent some coins (7) to the sexcoin address.
Since now, the coins are not transferred. A few posts ago I saw the statement, the paper wallets are ok?
Has anyone the same issue?
Do I have to wait longer? Perhaps the network is not so fast due to the 51% attack?
#5492559 was the sent withdrawal and when I have a look in a block explorer, the block 3,089,685 is now processed...
Regards,
Alex
I created a paper wallet with: https://paperwallet.sexcoin.info/ on tuesday and sent some coins (7) to the sexcoin address.
Since now, the coins are not transferred. A few posts ago I saw the statement, the paper wallets are ok?
Has anyone the same issue?
Do I have to wait longer? Perhaps the network is not so fast due to the 51% attack?
#5492559 was the sent withdrawal and when I have a look in a block explorer, the block 3,089,685 is now processed...
Regards,
Alex
Hey Alex. Welcome to Sexcoin!
You can search the public address (the one starting with either 'R' or 'S') using an explorer and see the balance:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/
http://be.sexcoin.info/chain/Sexcoin
If this search returns that it has "not been seen" or "not on network" then the coins did not make it. At that point, where were the coins sent from?
Hi
I created a paper wallet with: https://paperwallet.sexcoin.info/ on tuesday and sent some coins (7) to the sexcoin address.
Since now, the coins are not transferred. A few posts ago I saw the statement, the paper wallets are ok?
Has anyone the same issue?
Do I have to wait longer? Perhaps the network is not so fast due to the 51% attack?
#5492559 was the sent withdrawal and when I have a look in a block explorer, the block 3,089,685 is now processed...
Regards,
Alex
I created a paper wallet with: https://paperwallet.sexcoin.info/ on tuesday and sent some coins (7) to the sexcoin address.
Since now, the coins are not transferred. A few posts ago I saw the statement, the paper wallets are ok?
Has anyone the same issue?
Do I have to wait longer? Perhaps the network is not so fast due to the 51% attack?
#5492559 was the sent withdrawal and when I have a look in a block explorer, the block 3,089,685 is now processed...
Regards,
Alex
Yeah... that's TERA!
Just a reminder for anyone who wants to see a fairly accurate Market Cap for SexCoin should head over to pay a visit to our friends at Coin Gecko: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/sexcoin
Hi,
Any news from Livecoin?
br,
Andy
Any news from Livecoin?
br,
Andy
Livecoin has told us that they are upgrading the client and are watching the network. I expect that trading will reopen once the network has at least one more pool to balance out the hashrate.
Are offline paper wallets still ok or is there anything i need to do there?
Offline paper wallets are still secure. At the moment, the network is fairly secure with the exception that almost all the hashpower is coming from one pool. This will change as more pools adopt.
Are offline paper wallets still ok or is there anything i need to do there?
Hi,
Any news from Livecoin?
br,
Andy
Any news from Livecoin?
br,
Andy
::Update::
We are seeing more and more adaptation of the new client. This is good news for the network.
We are nearly certain there is a fork, which is being held alive by 0.10.4.x clients. I would encourage everyone to upgrade now, and definitely before sending coins. Almost all 0.10.4.x client are reporting a block height much below the current height.
We have at least two large pools mining auxpow, one is constant and the other periodically jumps in. This is also a good sign. I have been in contact with the pools that have made commitments, and at least two are still working on getting the client installed.
There is an issue which has come up with at least the linux headless client around initial syncing in that it will mysteriously die. We have found this most prevalent on nodes that are slim on RAM. Syncing via bootstrap ( bootstrap ) or adding in a swapfile so you have a total of 4 gigs of RAM+Swap seems to cure this. We are looking into it for a better solution.
EDIT: After the initial sync, the swap file can be turned off.
We are seeing more and more adaptation of the new client. This is good news for the network.
We are nearly certain there is a fork, which is being held alive by 0.10.4.x clients. I would encourage everyone to upgrade now, and definitely before sending coins. Almost all 0.10.4.x client are reporting a block height much below the current height.
We have at least two large pools mining auxpow, one is constant and the other periodically jumps in. This is also a good sign. I have been in contact with the pools that have made commitments, and at least two are still working on getting the client installed.
There is an issue which has come up with at least the linux headless client around initial syncing in that it will mysteriously die. We have found this most prevalent on nodes that are slim on RAM. Syncing via bootstrap ( bootstrap ) or adding in a swapfile so you have a total of 4 gigs of RAM+Swap seems to cure this. We are looking into it for a better solution.
EDIT: After the initial sync, the swap file can be turned off.
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools
hash-to-coins.com
ispace.co.uk
prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed?
Well... yes... here is but one public example of us informing them: https://twitter.com/Timelord2067/status/1078511960004546560 other examples are via emails.
It's unclear from their front page if hash-to-coins.com has upgraded or not (not the least of which is because they last updated their "news" feed six months ago), if you can shed any light on that, feel free to post the info here so we can investigate it.
DO NOT USE YOBIT OR CRYPTOPIA FOR SEXCOIN TRANSACTIONS - YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SXC!
Informing them has been done. Our past experience has taught us that many times it holds more weight with many pool-ops when users that mine on a pool inform them. This is why we solicit the community ( everyone that reads this thread ) to let your pool-ops know. Link the github repo and also this thread when you tell them.
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools
hash-to-coins.com
ispace.co.uk
prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed?
Well... yes... here is but one public example of us informing them: https://twitter.com/Timelord2067/status/1078511960004546560 other examples are via emails.
It's unclear from their front page if hash-to-coins.com has upgraded or not (not the least of which is because they last updated their "news" feed six months ago), if you can shed any light on that, feel free to post the info here so we can investigate it.
DO NOT USE YOBIT OR CRYPTOPIA FOR SEXCOIN TRANSACTIONS - YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SXC!
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
have the pools
hash-to-coins.com
ispace.co.uk
prohashing.com (they run an explorer too)
been informed?
Happy New Year
#SEXCOIN
Kiss
Mandatory upgrade to version V15
https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases
#SEXCOIN
Kiss
Mandatory upgrade to version V15
https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases
#SEXCOIN BEST POOL
http://lavapit.lavajumper.com/getting_started
Mandatory upgrade to version V15
https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases
http://lavapit.lavajumper.com/getting_started
Mandatory upgrade to version V15
https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases
::Update::
First Merge-mined blocks (auxpow) are on the chain!!!!!
Network has about 300GH/s on it right now. This is fantastic news for all of us!!!
First Merge-mined blocks (auxpow) are on the chain!!!!!
Network has about 300GH/s on it right now. This is fantastic news for all of us!!!
Here's a good 'addnode' list for anyone that looks like they need it:
Code:
addnode=74.208.174.17:9560
addnode=24.99.50.91:9560
addnode=62.99.220.186:9560
addnode=176.31.13.198:9560
addnode=217.103.221.7:5710
addnode=76.74.177.199:9560
addnode=66.172.11.190:6969
addnode=144.202.64.162:9560
addnode=76.74.178.151:9560
addnode=45.32.222.48:9560
addnode=37.187.135.212:9560
addnode=195.154.163.121:9560
addnode=80.123.211.2:9560
::Update::
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
It looks like the fork is getting resolved. I'm waiting to hear back from a couple of pools.
We need people to get off 10.4 and 10.4.1, so spread the word if you can.
I don't have links for other pools on me at the moment, so can't say for certain, however, from what I've seen myself and findblocks are on what I like to call the main fork.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
I'm at block 3081200 21:00 AEST (GMT +10)
7436568d2a8b9a9e42f000e0ba1526db3131ad7e278162d5e47a5d0a99be2180
I don't have links for other pools on me at the moment, so can't say for certain, however, from what I've seen myself and findblocks are on what I like to call the main fork.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
Cryptopia, iSpace blockminer and prohashing are on what I like to call fork two and have not upgraded their wallets while chainz.cryptoid is on what i like to call fork three which is even further behind the block count than fork main or fork two.
Nova told me directly they have upgraded, I'm just trying to see if the other exchanges (Livecoin, NLexch, thecoin.pw ) have upgraded... and what chain they are on.
Jump to: