I have joined the twitter/fb/blog bounties.
Topic: TaaS — Tokenized Closed-End Fund - page 283. (Read 277295 times)
Good luck with this project
I have joined the twitter/fb/blog bounties.
I have joined the twitter/fb/blog bounties.
2000 BTC raise, the great milestone has been reached, so we can expect for 3000 BTC milestone. We love TaaS which will give is magnificent profit.
2000 BTC and now the price of BTC the more expensive, the advantage once.
i don't buy too much, because i hope this can be profitable ICO
The french official translation thread is here please show some support
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/5000-btc-raised-taas-token-as-a-service-ico-1-jours-1854543
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/5000-btc-raised-taas-token-as-a-service-ico-1-jours-1854543
2000 BTC is quite larget market cap, it is more than 2 million usd right now. Please don't buy too much, I hope this can be profitable ICO, don't overbuy it.
This is pretty much riding under the radar. Not much marketing done.
2000 BTC raise, the great milestone has been reached, so we can expect for 3000 BTC milestone. We love TaaS which will give is magnificent profit.
Hi. thanks for joining our bounty program. stakes will be counted and added to against everyone's name after end of bounty campaign.
and if you have more than 100 followrs and friends and regularly retweeting and sharing posts and tweets it means you are already accepted. don't worry about that accepted tag that is just a formal thing.
Allright sir thank you. Becauese i just confuse how we know stake we get. I was joined signature campaign too. Hope this project will be successfull.
What's the difference between this and ICONOMI? Aren't they both platforms to help ease investments?
TaaS is a closed-end fund managed by the TaaS team and audited by their cryptographic audit technology. Iconomi has an open fund- ICNX- and a closed fund- ICNP- both managed by the Iconomi team and audited using conventional means, and Iconomi is also building a digital asset management platform (DAMP) where anybody (if their local law allows it) can create and manage their own funds. At least that's my general understanding of both.
What's the difference between this and ICONOMI? Aren't they both platforms to help ease investments?
I feel my investment will be amazing this is growing more people contributing into this project. This community will be very larger as time is passing people are becoming the part of this project.
you are right with a strong community , this project can go only up . a lot of new people would like to get in cryptocurrency world and TAAS is here to get them in . I wish all the best for the team and to make this project a succes. Interested, but after watching the Youtube clip of the guy on Coin Interview... I am quite concerned about this. Doesn't appear knowledgable, but worse than that, he seems quite shifty. Can't answer basic questions about his service which is now, I suppose technically, valuated at about $2Mil. Something's wrong here.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
It doesn't seem like Evan is convinced at all in that interview, he seems extremely skeptical. Not to mention he has to correct Dimitri multiple times during the interview, correct him on things you would hope he is an expert on considering his position in TaaS and the supposed expertise you would hope would go along with such a position. Evan appears to know more than he does... Dimitri didn't even know what a fiduciary was and people are okay with trusting him with millions? Lol.
Also a lot of "maybe's", "I think so's", "should be's", "in the future's", etc coming from Dimitri.
And yeah, his body language is shifty as fuck.
Yeah, this just reeks. I hope nobody gets screwed out of their hard-earned funds. I've been involved in enough Security-scams to be have a pretty good spidey-sense and it is definitely going off here.
I don't really think you can nail him with that performance, some people are very nervous on camera especially if you are doing it for the first time
And I really wish somebody would respond to my post about what seem to be inconsistencies in their proclaimed experience on their website and what they actually have done according to their work history on their linkedins. I just feel like these guys are trying to sell themselves a little more than they can reasonably attest to, which I guess makes sense considering they are trying to raise 101 million USD which would be the largest ICO in history.
Call me crazy but if you want to hold the largest ICO in history I feel like there should be some pretty damn good/distinguished/recognized experts leading the project or something that can justify that level of trust and confidence from investors.
Hi dear.
it is really nice to see that you've researched about TaaS very deeply and pointed out those points and weakness above.. I am really not able to answer them because I don't belong to technical department. but I've sent your questions to all founders and asked them to must answer them because these questions are really important and must be answered. I hope someone from core team will come online and give you a detailed answer. and you can join telegram and talk to them live and ask any question you have in mind.
thank you so much for your time.
Okay so TaaS has been pretty active in here since this but still no response, kind of discouraging tbh.
Agree, this should have been adressed already...jamalaezaz??
stormia - yep. I'd be wary of this.
Interested, but after watching the Youtube clip of the guy on Coin Interview... I am quite concerned about this. Doesn't appear knowledgable, but worse than that, he seems quite shifty. Can't answer basic questions about his service which is now, I suppose technically, valuated at about $2Mil. Something's wrong here.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
EDIT: Seriously - check out this interview and then tell me that you're comfortable sending any money or crypto to this guy. He's a co-founder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cSK1d-7Irc
EDIT 2: I am getting a bad vibe from these guys, all around. Good luck investors. I am out.
EDIT 3: In that interview, I noticed that Dimitri Chupryna really struggled answering any technical questions. I'll point out that his title, according to the Whitepaper, and the fund's website is as follows: Co-founder, Technology & Analytics.
It doesn't seem like Evan is convinced at all in that interview, he seems extremely skeptical. Not to mention he has to correct Dimitri multiple times during the interview, correct him on things you would hope he is an expert on considering his position in TaaS and the supposed expertise you would hope would go along with such a position. Evan appears to know more than he does... Dimitri didn't even know what a fiduciary was and people are okay with trusting him with millions? Lol.
Also a lot of "maybe's", "I think so's", "should be's", "in the future's", etc coming from Dimitri.
And yeah, his body language is shifty as fuck.
Yeah, this just reeks. I hope nobody gets screwed out of their hard-earned funds. I've been involved in enough Security-scams to be have a pretty good spidey-sense and it is definitely going off here.
I don't really think you can nail him with that performance, some people are very nervous on camera especially if you are doing it for the first time
And I really wish somebody would respond to my post about what seem to be inconsistencies in their proclaimed experience on their website and what they actually have done according to their work history on their linkedins. I just feel like these guys are trying to sell themselves a little more than they can reasonably attest to, which I guess makes sense considering they are trying to raise 101 million USD which would be the largest ICO in history.
Call me crazy but if you want to hold the largest ICO in history I feel like there should be some pretty damn good/distinguished/recognized experts leading the project or something that can justify that level of trust and confidence from investors.
Hi dear.
it is really nice to see that you've researched about TaaS very deeply and pointed out those points and weakness above.. I am really not able to answer them because I don't belong to technical department. but I've sent your questions to all founders and asked them to must answer them because these questions are really important and must be answered. I hope someone from core team will come online and give you a detailed answer. and you can join telegram and talk to them live and ask any question you have in mind.
thank you so much for your time.
Okay so TaaS has been pretty active in here since this but still no response, kind of discouraging tbh.
Hello, therefore Taas token is something like a mutual fund service? where peole invest in the tokens, taas use the funds to trade and we are publicly accessible to the trade ledger and 50% profit will be payback to investor?
Thanks
Thanks
That's right, it is a closed-end fund that will accept investors only during the ICO, distributing tokens as a proof of membership of the fund, this tokens will be tradeable in different exchanges after the ICO ends. 50% of the profits made quarterly will be distributed between the token holders (Proportionally to the number of tokens in possesion), 25% of the profits will be reinvestend in the portfolio and the remaining 25% will be stored in a fund. You can read the whitepaper here:
http://taas.fund/media/whitepaper.pdf
So I saw there is cap at 101 million, but is there a minimum for ico to succeed? If, for example, ico collects 10mil, there will be only 10 million coins and the rest 90 million will be burned? maybe there is white paper to read with all that stuff available? It would be nice if you have one in russian
Thats right, there are 101.000.000 tokens available during the ICO. All the tokens not acquired during this period will be burned. No new tokens will ever be made so the supply will be limited, this usually represents a premium on the price.
Whitepaper in russian:
http://taas.fund/media/whitepaper_rus.pdf
Hello, therefore Taas token is something like a mutual fund service? where peole invest in the tokens, taas use the funds to trade and we are publicly accessible to the trade ledger and 50% profit will be payback to investor?
Thanks
Thanks
So I saw there is cap at 101 million, but is there a minimum for ico to succeed? If, for example, ico collects 10mil, there will be only 10 million coins and the rest 90 million will be burned? maybe there is white paper to read with all that stuff available? It would be nice if you have one in russian
I just wrote an article about why I invested in TaaS: https://steemit.com/crypto-news/@xwerk/taas-token-as-a-service-a-tokenized-closed-end-fund-ico-running-with-2000-btc-raised
hy i have a technical question i reach senior member rank on bitcointalk i am signed like full member on signature campaign on tass so i upgrade my signature and wear that for senior member it is that ok? or i have to do something more?
Jump to: