Topic: Taking bets that casinobit is a ponzi - page 3. (Read 5129 times)

Quote from: pedrog on August 20, 2013, 08:57:16 AM

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

Well, I thought I was the one gambling here.

You're not even 2:1 sure? Just 50/50 sure?

If you aren't satisfy, just get to another gambling ground, every places got it rake. In this case, you determine whats the rake. Don't I even know it

Not sure what that says... At any rate I wouldn't take 1:1 either though, if I was interested. Pedrog seems like a good negotiator here.

001sonkit

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

Well, I thought I was the one gambling here.

You're not even 2:1 sure? Just 50/50 sure?

If you aren't satisfy, just get to another gambling ground, every places got it rake. In this case, you determine whats the rake. Don't I even know it

pedrog

legendary

Activity: 2786

Merit: 1031

Quote from: DiamondCardz on August 20, 2013, 06:51:42 AM

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

Well, I thought I was the one gambling here.

You're not even 2:1 sure? Just 50/50 sure?

geofflosophy

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

I seriously think that CasinoBit has convinced HIMSELF, somehow, that he isn't running a ponzi.

Those returns are gone btw, I am just getting back to my high after being down two days. Will play Switzerland as to whether those early returns were legit or not, but if they weren't, Casinobit seems to have covered them.

DiamondCardz

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1118

I seriously think that CasinoBit has convinced HIMSELF, somehow, that he isn't running a ponzi.

Zaih

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: Boelens on August 20, 2013, 05:23:34 AM

Quote from: pedrog on August 19, 2013, 10:02:35 PM

Quote from: geofflosophy on August 19, 2013, 08:58:37 PM

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

You obviously missed his sarcasm... His point is that you cannot prove a negative; if he claims he has a pink unicorn in his garage, the burden of proof is on him to prove he has it. Likewise, if you claim ponzi, the burden of proof is on you.

This ^! Fucking this^11!!!

Is it really that hard, Zaih!!111?

Quote from: Boelens on August 20, 2013, 05:23:34 AM

The odd's are obviously completely even, as stated in OP.

You bet 1 BTC, if you win, you win 1 BTC. If you lose, you lose 1 BTC.

1:1 that is? Or is that 2:1? I don't understand bookies terminology (Well, I'm simply not familiar with it)

If I was sure of a outcome, I'll give you 100:1, fuck, 100000:1...

1:1 is not acceptable.

I'll accept 5:1, your 5 coins against mine.

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

Up for a 1:1 bet that in one month they won't be a scammer, or however you state that. (And by 1:1 I mean my bitcoin your bitcoin, I too am not familiar with these odds)

Three months? That's sufficient time for a ponzi scheme to run its course.

001sonkit

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou

Up for a 1:1 bet that in one month they won't be a scammer, or however you state that. (And by 1:1 I mean my bitcoin your bitcoin, I too am not familiar with these odds)

You are correct, just image reference for who are not clear

Boelens

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: pedrog on August 19, 2013, 10:02:35 PM

Quote from: geofflosophy on August 19, 2013, 08:58:37 PM

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

You obviously missed his sarcasm... His point is that you cannot prove a negative; if he claims he has a pink unicorn in his garage, the burden of proof is on him to prove he has it. Likewise, if you claim ponzi, the burden of proof is on you.

This ^! Fucking this^11!!!

Is it really that hard, Zaih!!111?

Quote from: pedrog on August 19, 2013, 10:02:35 PM

The odd's are obviously completely even, as stated in OP.

You bet 1 BTC, if you win, you win 1 BTC. If you lose, you lose 1 BTC.

1:1 that is? Or is that 2:1? I don't understand bookies terminology (Well, I'm simply not familiar with it)

If I was sure of a outcome, I'll give you 100:1, fuck, 100000:1...

1:1 is not acceptable.

I'll accept 5:1, your 5 coins against mine.

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

Up for a 1:1 bet that in one month they won't be a scammer, or however you state that. (And by 1:1 I mean my bitcoin your bitcoin, I too am not familiar with these odds)

cornish_will

member

Activity: 62

Merit: 10

i think i can see a hole in this bet lol

if the site refuses to pay out that in itself is not confirmation of ponzi scheme just possible fraud

Zaih

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: geofflosophy on August 19, 2013, 08:58:37 PM

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

You obviously missed his sarcasm... His point is that you cannot prove a negative; if he claims he has a pink unicorn in his garage, the burden of proof is on him to prove he has it. Likewise, if you claim ponzi, the burden of proof is on you.

This ^! Fucking this^11!!!

Is it really that hard, Zaih!!111?

Quote from: CasinoBit on August 19, 2013, 05:11:16 PM

The odd's are obviously completely even, as stated in OP.

You bet 1 BTC, if you win, you win 1 BTC. If you lose, you lose 1 BTC.

1:1 that is? Or is that 2:1? I don't understand bookies terminology (Well, I'm simply not familiar with it)

If I was sure of a outcome, I'll give you 100:1, fuck, 100000:1...

1:1 is not acceptable.

I'll accept 5:1, your 5 coins against mine.

No? I'm not 100% sure. If I was 100% sure I'd be willing to wager up to all my Bitcoins.

I'm looking for a gamble, and a fair gamble. I'm not 5x'ing you.

bit777

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

*silence*

Don't pretend to have achieved something. Your thread is a nightmare of complaints with people waiting for days to get a withdrawal. Out of 55-60 gambling websites, yours is the only one for which bets are taken if it is a scam or not in the open forums. This alone should very much bother you.

Mooshire

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

BEWARE THE CSS CALLS

pedrog

legendary

Activity: 2786

Merit: 1031

Quote from: geofflosophy on August 19, 2013, 08:58:37 PM

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

You obviously missed his sarcasm... His point is that you cannot prove a negative; if he claims he has a pink unicorn in his garage, the burden of proof is on him to prove he has it. Likewise, if you claim ponzi, the burden of proof is on you.

This ^! Fucking this^11!!!

Is it really that hard, Zaih!!111?

The odd's are obviously completely even, as stated in OP.

You bet 1 BTC, if you win, you win 1 BTC. If you lose, you lose 1 BTC.

1:1 that is? Or is that 2:1? I don't understand bookies terminology (Well, I'm simply not familiar with it)

If I was sure of a outcome, I'll give you 100:1, fuck, 100000:1...

1:1 is not acceptable.

I'll accept 5:1, your 5 coins against mine.

geofflosophy

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

You obviously missed his sarcasm... His point is that you cannot prove a negative; if he claims he has a pink unicorn in his garage, the burden of proof is on him to prove he has it. Likewise, if you claim ponzi, the burden of proof is on you.

Zaih

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

The odd's are obviously completely even, as stated in OP.

You bet 1 BTC, if you win, you win 1 BTC. If you lose, you lose 1 BTC.

1:1 that is? Or is that 2:1? I don't understand bookies terminology (Well, I'm simply not familiar with it)

HollowIP

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 250

Can you prove I don't have a pink unicorn that shits rainbows in my garage, it's up to you to prove me wrong...

No, you claim you have it, so provide proof.

Proof that this is a dubious scheme have already been posted. Not just a claim.

So, post proof that you own a pink rainbow shitting unicorn.

Oh fuck, not a burden of proof argument. This was the one place on the internet without that...lol

vlees

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100