I really hope so too. I really don't think bitcoin should be taxed. It's a p2p currency after all. I really shouldn't call bitcoin s currency. To volatile. It's more of an asset.
Real estate is a "p2p" investment, and it's taxed...why not bitcoin?
Of course bitcoin should be taxed! It should be treated as any other currency or investment is treated. Now, of course no one wants to pay taxes so from that perspective I understand your motivation.
My point is - what makes bitcoin any different than any other investment or currency?
We all want the world to accept bitcoin as a legit currency. We can't expect that to happen if we don't want it to be subject to the same laws that all legit currencies are subjected to.
I think the idea on this forum is that Bitcoin is a legit currency outside of the current systems, and thus it shouldn't be taxed because of it being outside of those systems. I could be very incorrect, but that's what I'm understanding.
I think I understand why people don't want it to be taxed, but there are so many different things different with Bitcoin when you try to compare it to traditional currencies that there isn't really a way to define it for taxes aside from being property, which it technically isn't.
Bitcoin is in a unique position right now. I'm curious as to where it will go in the future.