I don't think it's a bad idea, the only thing is that Monopoly is a 20th century game, and logically it is centred on real estate. It would be interesting to have a similar game that simulates getting rich digitally, which is the main source of wealth in the 21st century (although real estate is still very important).
In the absence of this, Monopoly is not bad, it is a classic game and can teach them the basic principles you list, such as to acquire assets.
The fact that it's 20th century game doesn't mean that this game is outdated for 21th century. The basic rules and principles of this game matches the basics of business and it doesn't change, it's the same in 21th century. By playing this game, you learn that in order to succeed in business, you have to keep in mind that your every action carries risks and you should be ready for that, you have to keep in mind your competitors, you have to keep in mind when to negotiate, when to befriend, when to become evil, etc.
And the developers of Monopoly became millionaires because they convinced others that their game would teach children to become rich.
The Monopoly game is only a simplified investment simulator. And the fact that a child plays the game well will not guarantee a result for him if he does not master the skills of an investor, but perhaps the game will shape the child’s interest in studying finance.
And what does it mean if Monopoly developers become millionaires by creating and selling this toy? Nothing, it was just a good business that is also really interesting and beneficial for kids to my mind.
No child will become a master of investment by playing this game but it's really a good game to attract their attention and show them how the business works in life.