Can someone explain to me the process behind tbm devfee? I understand the interval system, the mining soft stops the user's mining for a few seconds to mine himself for the dev. But, tbm takes fees continuously and I don't really understand the process behind it. How do you charge fees when the user is mining? Sorry, if it's a dumb question
I believe TBM takes hashes during startup of the miner during DAG validation.
There might be something that happens around 3 hours that splits the hashrate for a bit as I am noticing a consistent but transient drop-off in performance about every 3 - 3.5 hours of mining. But they don't switch pools like other miners do (and lots of users abuse that payment by either stopping and restarting the miner, or blocking the IP that the miner will switch to), and since I have spent a lot of time (and continue to spend time as TBM gets updated so often) tuning TBM my profits are significantly higher than any other green or red mining software -- especially on my 3090 which gets a consistent 133+ MH/s and I could probably push it to 137+ if I wanted to get close to bumping up against thermal throttling.
For example, the following is a current screenshot of the miner output for my 3090 card:
15.5 hours of mining on 2Miners.com which calculates shares to hashrate as 145.4 MH/s for 1 share / min.
870 shares in 936 minutes = 0.9355 shares / minute => 145.4*0.9355 ==
136 MH/s average
Sorry mate but this not the calculation for your mining speed
Show us your poolside hashrate, this is important. Why no one in this thread show us his poolside hashrate? mysterious
2Miners has vardiff in my opinion - so countshare is senseless
And i tested this dump miner also - show 8% higher hashrate - poolhashrate was 5% lower than any other miner. And nothing more is important.
@sp__
very strong arguments or proofs - not
the usage numbers of your miner show us how good your miner is.
The math is correct and share count is the only way to accurately interpret poolside hashrate of a single card within a mixed rig of many; I don't pay any attention to the miner reported hashrate, just shares per minute with the difficulty factor adjustment and your 'opinion' about 2miners being Vardiff is just like any other opinion when compared to facts... They use a static difficulty and just recently expanded their PPLNS time window to accommodate their higher total pool hashrate, go to their telegram and ask them if you don't trust that I've already asked and confirmed. Besides -- I've shown a bunch of actual @ pool screenshots and videos, they're all still on Imgur.
And if you don't like the dev-team for whatever reason, that's fine.
I don't personally know them, I don't know their history, and the only financial entanglements I have with them are that my rigs are running faster with their software than on any other software.
It only financially disincentives me to have you or anyone else gain any benefits from their software, since any extra hashrate you gain will lower my current price:profit advantage -- which F'ing ASICS have already done enough of.
What I do take issue with is attacking or discrediting my legitimate, but obviously misplaced desire to help others master the intricacies of how to properly tune this software for AMD 6-series and non-LHR 30-series cards. I recently happened to have acquired a 3070Ti and am having difficulties getting it to consistently hash with TBMiner and I'm having to spend a lot of time tinkering and learning how various single and combined changes affect the miner, and despite my contributions to others tuning, I have received no help, or hints or education from ANYONE on this thread except from the developers.
Further to your overall avenue of attack; do I think @SP_ might have been misguided in mentioning how TBMiner isn't affiliated with any Russian people / groups? Yes, and we all make public relations' mistakes, and it's especially difficult to navigate the financial-sociopolitical landscape at the best of times, let alone during times of war.. From a probability of converting fence-sitters to users perspective, there's only 1 positive outcome -- miners who decide (correctly or not), that the 1% dev-fee going to Russia is worse than just donating 10% of their hashrate to whatever cause they want, and dozens of negative outcomes, so the probability that this style of rhetoric is going to result in personal benefit is quite low, which is why I didn't think it was a good idea -- but it doesn't affect the TBMiner code, or the financial results and benefits I see from their miner.