Team Black Miner (ETHW ETC Vertcoin Ravencoin Zilliqa +dual +tripple mining ) - page 23.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

v1.49

1. Fixed timeout bug
2. Display the lost LHR hashrate in the console
3. Ethproxy improvements. (0 rejects on hiveon.com)

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases

TeamBlackMiner_1_49_cuda_11_5.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a6e23de038431c77331bf77c3a70c983a134dd6c1abbd9cf4dcf29c9ce9a7a35?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_49_cuda_11_4.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/152b27d71ae6c343eada933af3870f57bcb811c3cce65d04c2280b7f12c9f4f3?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_49_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_5.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a5a25d3e0ffe7f68ad89339b406879ad7909a1ce7216a4a4aa70ec12d8877f71?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_49_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_4.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/effb4a539c85edc35f1c2db298a495db51cc1e63d5d17a52498ab5e8a7a33459?nocache=1

Quote from: Dr_Victor on February 01, 2022, 11:03:11 PM

How can I use Team Black Miner with RaveOS?

Upgrade the driver

Quote from: KillrBee on February 01, 2022, 08:48:03 AM

I was getting a lot of "the GPU is responding slowly" and it would stop accepting jobs for about 5-6 minutes before finally timing out the card.

Fixed in v1.49

Quote from: UniJo on January 26, 2022, 07:10:17 AM

Im stuck with HiveOn pool. So i don't want the stales. Im trying to find the best Xint to avoid them. And maybe make a test of 24hours of both miners.

Some stales, but no illegal shares anymore.

Fixed in v1.49

Dr_Victor

sr. member

Activity: 954

Merit: 250

RaveOS has not updated drivers for months and sticks on v.470. This miner can't detect cards. How can I use Team Black Miner with RaveOS?

atoue

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on February 01, 2022, 06:19:31 PM

Quote from: KillrBee on February 01, 2022, 08:48:03 AM

I was getting a lot of "the GPU is responding slowly" and it would stop accepting jobs for about 5-6 minutes before finally timing out the card.

I managed to reproduce this now on my mixed card rig with the AMD cards running on miningpoolhub with --xintensity 1024. Added logging and debug, and let it run over night.

can't wait to see the updates about this! Cheesy

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: KillrBee on February 01, 2022, 08:48:03 AM

I was getting a lot of "the GPU is responding slowly" and it would stop accepting jobs for about 5-6 minutes before finally timing out the card.

I managed to reproduce this now on my mixed card rig with the AMD cards running on miningpoolhub with --xintensity 1024. Added logging and debug, and let it run over night.

KillrBee

jr. member

Activity: 139

Merit: 3

Quote from: sp_ on February 01, 2022, 03:17:43 AM

Quote from: atoue on February 01, 2022, 02:36:32 AM

any updates? I have similar issue and reducing the intensities and also oc doesn't work on me, the time out event still coming back lol. With other miner it runs rock stable

Try the new version 1.48. My mixed card testrig with 7 cards. AMD / NVIDIA ran all night without any timeouts. and around +16MHASH faster poolside hash.

I reduced the intensities (from 1000 to 800) on my AMD cards and it's run for just over 11 hours on HiveOS (using 1.47) and 10 hours on windows using 1.48. Before I lowered my intensity from 1000 to 750 on the windows machine, I was getting a lot of "the GPU is responding slowly" and it would stop accepting jobs for about 5-6 minutes before finally timing out the card.

With HiveOS, I would just get the drop in power of the card, but the hash-rate would remain the same, it would also stop accepting jobs eventually (although the Nvidia cards were still running properly, and the client would continue to send in accepted shares for 3-4 minutes after the client stopped accepting jobs; which makes me curious about what the time threshold is for providing stale shares; none of these were rejected by the pool.

Overall hashrate has reduced a bit at the pool, especially on the Windows client where I was running at 66-67 MH/s on 15+ hour runs, while I'm sitting around 62 MH/s after 10 hours right now. (difference was intensity of 1000 vs. 750).

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: atoue on February 01, 2022, 02:36:32 AM

any updates? I have similar issue and reducing the intensities and also oc doesn't work on me, the time out event still coming back lol. With other miner it runs rock stable

Try the new version 1.48. My mixed card testrig with 7 cards. AMD / NVIDIA ran all night without any timeouts. and around +16MHASH faster poolside hash.

atoue

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: KillrBee on January 31, 2022, 03:26:46 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 31, 2022, 03:18:47 PM

Quote from: KillrBee on January 31, 2022, 09:47:28 AM

00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU4 3090 CUDA 8 5801 26/0 0 0 0 336
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU5 2060S CUDA 12 3000 27/0 85 1650 7950 115

Are you sure this is the 1.47 version? A bug was fixed in v1.45 that fix the memclock/coreclock on mixed rigs. but your rtx 3090 is 0

Yes it's v. 1.47 and the 0's are because Nvidia cards that are highly overclocked will glitch on the sensors in HiveOS.

I'm going to reduce the intensities and see if that can increase the stability. I'll let you know if there are any changes in behaviour.

any updates? I have similar issue and reducing the intensities and also oc doesn't work on me, the time out event still coming back lol. With other miner it runs rock stable

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

v1.48
1. LHR partial unlock on the RTX 3050.
2. Improved the ETHProxy implementation. Fewer rejected shares.
3. Added LHR reset counter to output.
4. Less cpu usage and more stable LHR.
5. Add gpu timout warning in the output for testing purposes.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases

TeamBlackMiner_1_48_cuda_11_4.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/5f1ed688d37f20510ad980d91addb449101e5a920c41ef241fb417276853e684?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_48_cuda_11_5.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/689662e8f17f01a04f5f88f65bb724033059750eaa9d180ea05f4070e6b578f7?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_48_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_4.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/5fe33315dc81f51b854f730309f728ae286cd54aec3bc7d52e9eed10a4047eba?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_48_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_5.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/4e7e11bc9097a1b2634184eedf9b64522d7a68d174e3206571234d3c660a5973?nocache=1

KillrBee

jr. member

Activity: 139

Merit: 3

Quote from: sp_ on January 31, 2022, 03:18:47 PM

Quote from: KillrBee on January 31, 2022, 09:47:28 AM

00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU4 3090 CUDA 8 5801 26/0 0 0 0 336
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU5 2060S CUDA 12 3000 27/0 85 1650 7950 115

Are you sure this is the 1.47 version? A bug was fixed in v1.45 that fix the memclock/coreclock on mixed rigs. but your rtx 3090 is 0

Yes it's v. 1.47 and the 0's are because Nvidia cards that are highly overclocked will glitch on the sensors in HiveOS.

I'm going to reduce the intensities and see if that can increase the stability. I'll let you know if there are any changes in behaviour.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: KillrBee on January 31, 2022, 09:47:28 AM

00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU4 3090 CUDA 8 5801 26/0 0 0 0 336
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU5 2060S CUDA 12 3000 27/0 85 1650 7950 115

Are you sure this is the 1.47 version? A bug was fixed in v1.45 that fix the memclock/coreclock on mixed rigs. but your rtx 3090 is 0.
v1.48 will have some more output to console if the gpu is lagging. +less cpu usage, and LHR unlock support for the RTX 3050.

The Nvidia solver is running with blocking sync, that might stop the cl code to perform optimal.

KillrBee

jr. member

Activity: 139

Merit: 3

I'm still getting a number of timeouts and random crashes on 1.47 with the AMD and Nvidia cards running together in a single miner instance. Would there be any reason why having the two in a single instance would cause instability or reduced performance? HiveOS doesn't keep historical crash reports, but here are the last couple of lines from the ones I was able to capture:

send buffer: '(null)'
send buffer length: 146
recv buffer: '(null)'
recv buffer length: 213
recv buffer more data flag: 2058230960
-------------------------

recv buffer length: 211
recv buffer more data flag: -1564439376

My instances are all running standard OC/UV and are actually running at a much lower memory clock than I was previously using:

00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] us-eth.2miners.com (ethash) PING: 46ms VARDIFF: 2.03 EPOCH: 470
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974]
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974]
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] ID BOARD TYPE KERN XINT TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU0 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 30/0 73 1350 1059 122
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU1 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 25/0 73 1325 1059 112
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU2 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 25/0 73 1365 1059 134
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU3 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 26/0 73 1350 1059 111
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU4 3090 CUDA 12 4000 33/0 85 1590 11425 331
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] GPU5 2060S CUDA 12 4000 28/0 85 1455 7975 102
00:00:25 [2022-01-30 22:13:44.974] 912

And for some reason, there is always one of my AMD cards (not consistently the same one) that reports a good hashrate, but the share rate calculation results in around 10 MH/s lower than reported:

00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] us-eth.2miners.com (ethash) PING: 82ms VARDIFF: 2.03 EPOCH: 470
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082]
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082]
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] ID BOARD TYPE KERN XINT TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU0 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 29/0 73 1350 1059 124
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU1 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 25/0 73 1325 1059 114
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU2 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 24/0 73 1365 1059 135
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU3 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 1000 25/0 73 1350 1059 114
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU4 3090 CUDA 2 4000 33/0 0 0 0 337
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU5 2060S CUDA 13 4000 28/0 85 1455 7975 103
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] 927
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082]
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES RATE
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU0 gfx1030 529.70 kH/W 65.68 MH/s 65.64 MH/s 151/2/107 98.69%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU1 gfx1030 581.25 kH/W 65.68 MH/s 65.65 MH/s 175/1/112 99.43%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU2 gfx1030 538.80 kH/W 65.20 MH/s 65.24 MH/s 132/0/76 100.00%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU3 gfx1030 581.35 kH/W 65.69 MH/s 65.64 MH/s 152/1/91 99.35%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU4 3090 399.54 kH/W 134.64 MH/s 134.65 MH/s 356/0/61 100.00%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] GPU5 2060S 425.85 kH/W 44.29 MH/s 44.24 MH/s 126/3/25 97.67%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] 509.42 kH/W 441.18 MH/s 441.06 MH/s 1092/7/472 99.36%
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082]
00:06:11 [2022-01-31 09:21:28.082] SHARES PER MINUTE: 2.95 POOL HASHRATE: 429.23 MH/s

Speed Calculation GPU 2:
132 shares / 371 seconds = 0.356 shares/second :: 0.356 * 145 MH/s = 51.5 MH/s

Another longer run:

00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682]
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] us-eth.2miners.com (ethash) PING: 25ms VARDIFF: 2.03 EPOCH: 469
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682]
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682]
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] ID BOARD TYPE KERN XINT TEMP FAN CORE MEM WATT
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU0 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 655 24/0 73 1350 1066 125
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU1 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 655 19/0 73 1325 1066 114
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU2 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 655 19/0 73 1365 1066 137
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU3 gfx1030 OpenCL 0 655 20/0 73 1350 1066 114
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU4 3090 CUDA 8 5801 26/0 0 0 0 336
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU5 2060S CUDA 12 3000 27/0 85 1650 7950 115
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] 941
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682]
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] ID BOARD HASHRATE/W HASHRATE AVERAGE SHARES RATE
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU0 gfx1030 528.39 kH/W 66.05 MH/s 65.96 MH/s 388/0/173 100.00%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU1 gfx1030 574.01 kH/W 66.01 MH/s 65.99 MH/s 429/1/199 99.77%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU2 gfx1030 472.20 kH/W 65.64 MH/s 65.55 MH/s 456/0/175 100.00%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU3 gfx1030 584.50 kH/W 66.05 MH/s 65.96 MH/s 448/0/210 100.00%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU4 3090 397.74 kH/W 133.64 MH/s 133.63 MH/s 928/0/251 100.00%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] GPU5 2060S 388.06 kH/W 45.01 MH/s 45.03 MH/s 334/6/69 98.24%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] 490.81 kH/W 442.40 MH/s 442.12 MH/s 2983/7/1077 99.77%
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682]
00:17:27 [2022-01-25 08:17:42.682] SHARES PER MINUTE: 2.85 POOL HASHRATE: 414.36 MH/s

388 / 1047 = 0.37 * 145 = 53.7 MH/s
There's always 1 AMD card that seems to be running slow at the pool, but fine in the client.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: atoue on January 31, 2022, 03:41:50 AM

Thanks!

What does --xintensity [-1] do?

It will dynamically allocate the workload to the gpu based on the hashrate. So it's a floating intensity and not a fixed one.

atoue

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 31, 2022, 01:10:23 AM

Quote from: atoue on January 30, 2022, 10:46:46 PM

I got a good result with TBM for more than 24 hours, but the GPU timed out in AMD GPU came back and makes the result poor again

From the picture it looks like your gpu has crashed. Both temps and power indicate that. Run with --no-ansi. and lower the memclock -10. High intensity might need a slightly lower clock to run stable.

In the bug fixed, both power and temps where high when it timed out, which was not a real crash, but a glitch in the gpu test code.

Thanks!

What does --xintensity [-1] do?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: atoue on January 30, 2022, 10:46:46 PM

I got a good result with TBM for more than 24 hours, but the GPU timed out in AMD GPU came back and makes the result poor again

From the picture it looks like your gpu has crashed. Both temps and power indicate that. Run with --no-ansi. and lower the memclock -10. High intensity might need a slightly lower clock to run stable.

In the bug fixed, both power and temps where high when it timed out, which was not a real crash, but a glitch in the gpu test code.

atoue

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

I got a good result with TBM for more than 24 hours, but the GPU timed out in AMD GPU came back and makes the result poor again

Salva52

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Ah ok, sorry, i haven't understood.
Yes i have "1 level stale 12.14%" for.now, i will watch if level change. But that's sure 1 level stales are fully payed ?
Thanks

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Salva52 on January 30, 2022, 09:20:52 AM

Thanks sp_
I will try this setup.
But stale shares are bad ? Why ? If they accepted by the pool (mph)

if you see in the Round Shares Submitted shares , you sometimes see stale shares. Level1 stales are payed fully, but lower lewels give a lower payout I think.

On 2miners stale shares can give rejected shares, but you need a really high xintensity to trigger that. 8000 or more.

Salva52

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 30, 2022, 08:02:36 AM

Quote from: Salva52 on January 30, 2022, 05:15:19 AM

What do you recommand for a 3080FE and 3090Fe on miningpoolhub ? (xintensity/tweak/kernel) Thanks

rtx 3090 --xintensity 3000 --kernel 1 or 12. Run the autotune a few times to verify. The best kernel depends on your power settings.
rtx 3080 --xintensity 2500? --kernel 1 or 12. Run the autotune a few times to verify. The best kernel depends on your power settings.

try without tweak first, if you get stale shares incease the tweak to 4 or more

Thanks sp_
I will try this setup.
But stale shares are bad ? Why ? If they accepted by the pool (mph)

atoue

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 29, 2022, 09:20:58 AM

1.45 has a gpu timeout bug on AMD cards on high intensity. Upgrade to 1.47

Hi, I find that in 1.47 GPU timed out error still exist

https://i.ibb.co/pjWXGHC/Capture-5-LI.jpg

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Salva52 on January 30, 2022, 05:15:19 AM

What do you recommand for a 3080FE and 3090Fe on miningpoolhub ? (xintensity/tweak/kernel) Thanks

rtx 3090 --xintensity 3000 --kernel 1 or 12. Run the autotune a few times to verify. The best kernel depends on your power settings.
rtx 3080 --xintensity 2500? --kernel 1 or 12. Run the autotune a few times to verify. The best kernel depends on your power settings.

try without tweak first, if you get stale shares incease the tweak to 4 or more

Topic: Team Black Miner (ETHW ETC Vertcoin Ravencoin Zilliqa +dual +tripple mining ) - page 23. (Read 35090 times)