Team Black Miner (ETHW ETC Vertcoin Ravencoin Zilliqa +dual +tripple mining ) - page 29.

Akyboy

jr. member

Activity: 90

Merit: 1

Quote from: sp_ on January 22, 2022, 09:53:49 AM

s://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/88ec5032cb3b31a28cf2ac1649186478ef1d88d8749664ca3b8a1a5867fb6cdf?nocache=1

Quote from: Akyboy on January 21, 2022, 02:59:13 PM

I have 3070 cards and DAG verification is failing with Afterburner OC settings that iv been using for months. (CC -502, MC +1200 PL 46)

Can you try v1.44 beta please

Thanks for the beta version,..

this is what im getting now:
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992]
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992] Welcome to Team Black Miner 1.44
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992]
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992]
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992] No devices are set
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:15.992] Shutting down threads
00:00:00 [2022-01-22 11:34:20.001] Exiting

Looks like GPU is not found at all now

Riptide_NVN

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 16

Just a note to the dev (sp_) here. I admire the work you've done on the client so far.

One thing I would really like to see from the software is less work required to tune it. Other clients like TRM for example auto-detect intensity and away you go that's it. One barrier to entry for some people is the tuning work it takes for TBM. You can't just run the executable and have it 'just work' like TRM does so well for example.

I realize some people are going to claim this is laziness and that's fine. The fact is less work to get something running is always a plus.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

A working ssl isn't implemented yet
-------------------------------------------------------

Beta testers needed with Windows, latest drivers and 3060ti/3070 NON LHR

Does dag verficitation work now on higher clocks?

v1.44
1. Rewrote the dag generator to work better on high oc (3060ti /3070)

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases

TeamBlackMiner_1_44_cuda_11_6.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/88ec5032cb3b31a28cf2ac1649186478ef1d88d8749664ca3b8a1a5867fb6cdf?nocache=1

Quote from: Akyboy on January 21, 2022, 02:59:13 PM

I have 3070 cards and DAG verification is failing with Afterburner OC settings that iv been using for months. (CC -502, MC +1200 PL 46)

Can you try v1.44 beta please

Akyboy

jr. member

Activity: 90

Merit: 1

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 03:12:43 PM

Quote from: Akyboy on January 21, 2022, 03:10:52 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 03:05:50 PM

Did you try v1.43?

I suppose the question was for me?

I am on the latest version, just downloaded it

and --dagintensity 1 doesn't work?

Nope,.. tried again. It exits.

And if you can please help me connect to SSL / 5555 on flex pool

--hostname eth-us-east.flexpool.io --port 4444

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Akyboy on January 21, 2022, 03:10:52 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 03:05:50 PM

Did you try v1.43?

I suppose the question was for me?

I am on the latest version, just downloaded it

and --dagintensity 1 doesn't work?

Akyboy

jr. member

Activity: 90

Merit: 1

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 03:05:50 PM

Did you try v1.43?

I suppose the question was for me?

I am on the latest version, just downloaded it

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Did you try v1.43?

Akyboy

jr. member

Activity: 90

Merit: 1

Hi Guys

I have 3070 cards and DAG verification is failing with Afterburner OC settings that iv been using for months. (CC -502, MC +1200 PL 46)
If I reset AB to default, wait for verification to pass, and then apply my settings all will work fine.

Also, I have tried multiple ways to connect to SSL flexpool but it's not working for me.

Help would be appreciated.

Thanks

ekgd39

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 02:29:28 PM

If the dag fail to verify try -K 1 (--dagintensity 1). Did you try the v1.43 build yet? I have added 7 cuda kernels that could work better on lower TDP settings (power).

--kernel can now take a value from 0 to 15

But run it in autotune mode first and check the results

I use dag intensity 1 , on all rigs in test , but on rigs with 12x3070 and 12x3060ti it is unstable , maby you must do it option maximum slowly for rtx 30xx series, or do option dag repair, like LoL miner . if you do this , I can test it on all my rigs , I have above 6 ghs. Then I posted result to the other user , I think it can help many people , who want use you miner .

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

If the dag fail to verify try -K 1 (--dagintensity 1). Did you try the v1.43 build yet? I have added 7 cuda kernels that could work better on lower TDP settings (power).

--kernel can now take a value from 0 to 15

But run it in autotune mode first and check the results

ekgd39

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Dojo76 on January 21, 2022, 01:33:34 PM

Did you try to optimize the code to speed things up during mining? I suspect it goes kind of "out of sync" at times

The ethproxy protocol need the full hash sent to the pool, this is calculated with the CPU. I see that other miningsoftware have moved the cpu verification and submit code to it's own thread. This might help abit. TBMiner is not working good on low difficulty pools because of this.

my experience , in hive os 12x 3080 no lhr , the fastest core is 1 , 495.46 cuda 11.5 drivers give less performance than cuda 11.4 . You should do detailed tests in hive os and improve stability, some rigs keep getting errors while generating dag file. Manipulations with the kernel and pl do not give much change. I am attaching a screenshot of the 5 hour test.

https://ibb.co/b1d27xF

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Dojo76 on January 21, 2022, 02:00:57 PM

Xintensity is 71 by default for this pool, I suppose is by design but does not look that fast from my tests

Every miningpool have optimal defaults

6800xt / 6900xt seem to like

--xintensity 595

But only on 2miners.com, miningpoolhub.com, nanopool, f2pool, and a few other pools.

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/blob/main/FAQ.md

Dojo76

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Dojo76 on January 21, 2022, 01:33:34 PM

Did you try to optimize the code to speed things up during mining? I suspect it goes kind of "out of sync" at times

The ethproxy protocol need the full hash sent to the pool, this is calculated with the CPU. I see that other miningsoftware have moved the cpu verification and submit code to it's own thread. This might help abit. TBMiner is not working good on low difficulty pools because of this.

Understood. The higher the difficulty the best TBM can do, from my experience Hiveon is one of the pools with the lowest difficulty. You're in the right direction to 100% solve the issue but you have to rewrite the code for this pool and run a special kernel when hiveon is detected.

Xintensity is 71 by default for this pool, I suppose is by design but does not look that fast from my tests, share ratio is still higher with lolminer

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

v1.43
1. Fix fan speed percent and missing stats for some cards on AMD (linux)
2. Added 7 new cuda kernels that can give a speedup on some cards. (run autotune mode to check).

https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner/releases/

TeamBlackMiner_1_43_cuda_11_4.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/7acd45efee21da6a3356a46fc9e5469fcdad2df5a763ce1ebfa215f62727270b?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_43_cuda_11_5.7z
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a087191a66f57444f01052de90c963e745530b66e01b64d3b98f13f4573c7166?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_43_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_4.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/933c0eb298a423472217eaa5a0250c3ee0e24d6fa326fe1d7c37af5b79a7c20c?nocache=1

TeamBlackMiner_1_43_Ubuntu_18_04_Cuda_11_5.tar.xz
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/ec72ec4cdfadb2bf6a929810c63ea14d447f93c5886b8054231108286ab3720f?nocache=1

Quote from: Dojo76 on January 21, 2022, 01:33:34 PM

Did you try to optimize the code to speed things up during mining? I suspect it goes kind of "out of sync" at times

The ethproxy protocol need the full hash sent to the pool, this is calculated with the CPU. I see that other miningsoftware have moved the cpu verification and submit code to it's own thread. This might help abit. TBMiner is not working good on low difficulty pools because of this.

Dojo76

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 12:50:25 PM

Quote from: Dojo76 on January 21, 2022, 12:41:27 PM

Can you suggest a kernel for full AMD rigs? It seems that autotune always select kernel 0.

It used to be higher. We tried to improve it, but it keeps coming back.

The hiveon pool have 0% fee, so even with 0.5% rejected you should get more shares than on the other pools you listed. The hiveon pool is using the ETHPROXY protocol and different code in the miner than the 2miners and crazypool.

Hiveon has a higher share per minute rate compared to other pools, it seems TBM is not able to run 100% stable at that quicker rhythm. Probably is not fully integrated with ETHPROXY protocol but rejected are possible with other miners too because of that difference, despite being very rare. Did you try to optimize the code to speed things up during mining? I suspect it goes kind of "out of sync" at times

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: dle378 on January 21, 2022, 01:18:08 PM

How long should I run each test before changing to the next value?

If if fails in a few seconds (20) you should try another value. If it unlocks in a few minutes, might be good enough. You get warnings in the window when the card enters LHR, mode, then the program will reset the lhr and this takes time and hurt the pool hashrate.

dle378

copper member

Activity: 77

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 01:05:43 PM

Quote from: dle378 on January 21, 2022, 01:03:05 PM

Any recommendation for a xitensity value on the LHR cards as a starting point?

If it fails to unlock at 1 reduce to -1, -2 etc. If it unlocks stable at 1 increase the number to 2, 3,4 to increase the speed. LHR cards are tricky, and takes a while to find the correct clock setting / LHR setting.

I am trying that now.

How long should I run each test before changing to the next value?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: dle378 on January 21, 2022, 01:03:05 PM

Any recommendation for a xitensity value on the LHR cards as a starting point?

If it fails to unlock at 1 reduce to -1, -2 etc. If it unlocks stable at 1 increase the number to 2, 3,4 to increase the speed. LHR cards are tricky, and takes a while to find the correct clock setting / LHR setting.

dle378

copper member

Activity: 77

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on January 21, 2022, 12:53:42 PM

Quote from: dle378 on January 21, 2022, 12:51:20 PM

Should I try negative values this time?

Yes negative values are supported. The LHR docs are not updated to the later version. My GTX 3070 LHR works best with -4.

Thanks.

Any recommendation for a xitensity value on the LHR cards as a starting point?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: dle378 on January 21, 2022, 12:51:20 PM

Should I try negative values this time?

Yes negative values are supported. The LHR docs are not updated to the later version. My GTX 3070 LHR works best with -4. 60% tdp, 7900Memory/ stable at 44MHASH . I use --log in the batfile

Topic: Team Black Miner (ETHW ETC Vertcoin Ravencoin Zilliqa +dual +tripple mining ) - page 29. (Read 35090 times)