-snip-
I understand the importance of monitoring workers to ascertain there level of productivity, and to improve workers attendance and also enhance Cyber security but then, the inability of most management to go about this ethically has been of great concern to me.
What's your view about this?
Technology has its good and bad sides, but in all, the good side outweighs the bad side. Again, when it is well managed and used for the right purposes, it is even better as it will save costs, increase productivity and efficiency and also enhance security. However, the issue you just brought is not as you believed it, the Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) is not necessarily a means to monitor the employee but to record all the activities going on in the places covered by it.
This is why its primary purposes are for Security and Surveillance. You will need to do the surveillance for security's sake, which is why I believe the CCTV seems to be monitoring the employees, which is of course true, but not the main purpose.
There are no standard establishments where you will not see the CCTV, even in the supermarkets, all these can't primarily mean they are infringing on their employees or people's privacies but to be accountable for whatever happened in that vicinity. This is especially true when there is an incident. The first thing the police would ask is the CCTV.
If it were to be the monitoring of the employee, a senior staff without any additional payment would be able to do that just fine.
Technology helps save money and streamlines processes. However, the surveillance state is seeping in, which is troubling. When you enter a store or office, cameras are everywhere. "
For your protection", they claim, but you feel watched. Staff productivity? Continuous monitoring makes you feel like a hamster on a wheel
Call it control, not
accountability as they call it. We can micromanage everything and squeeze every last drop of work. All this pitch about senior staff monitoring without pay? That's absurd. The goal is to replace human judgment with a cold, calculated algorithm
No, I'm not anti-tech. It enabled improvements. We're delusional if we assume it's pure and good. A double-edged sword. Who controls this tech? Their true motivations? We must ask those questions. This material is slowly changing our jobs, privacy, and basic interactions. Not simply efficiency, but power and who has it