Pages:
Author

Topic: Texans organize 'Operation Counter Jade Helm' to keep an eye on the federal troo (Read 863 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Everyone can call these people paranoid. They are. We should be arguing about whether they are right to be paranoid or not.

They used to teach in school to be wary of governments having too much power, it leads to massacres and revolutions. I don't know if they still teach this anymore, but "power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

We have checks and balances in the government for this purpose. Though, I seem to recall Obama passing things without approval?

Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with there being checks and balances in place, and it seems to me, that that's all these people want to do. "Check" things out.
Probably arguing with idiots and government propagandaists, a lot are sick in the head with greed brainwashed, drugged, etc.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958
First Exclusion Ever
And the height of paranoia is wanting to keep an eye on an institution that has the legal authority to kill, imprison, and tax people, because those kinds of powers have never been abused before, right?



The military does not have any authority on US soil.

It is illegal, per the constitution to have actively deploy troups for real time military operations. So, you would need all aspects of the government, including the GOP to willingly take part in order for this fantasy about the military being deployed to take over Texas.

By the way, we do not want Texas. Please stop breaking your promises to secede and do it already. Or we will send troups and force you out of the union.

Correction. It WAS illegal under Posse Comitatus, but this was overwritten by The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. In effect the military has been given en exemption on operating on US soil.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-use-of-the-armed-forces-in-america-under-a-national-emergency/6169
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Everyone can call these people paranoid. They are. We should be arguing about whether they are right to be paranoid or not.

They used to teach in school to be wary of governments having too much power, it leads to massacres and revolutions. I don't know if they still teach this anymore, but "power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

We have checks and balances in the government for this purpose. Though, I seem to recall Obama passing things without approval?

Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with there being checks and balances in place, and it seems to me, that that's all these people want to do. "Check" things out.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
You do realize that the military is conducting exercises all around the country? Sixty miles east of here is the Top Gun facility. Funny how the residents of Fallon aren't concerned.

Texas is part of the United States, so thinking that the US can take over itself is the pinnacle of irrationality.

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty.
--Patrick Henry


What a paranoid guy.



And yet, historically speaking, the closest the US has come to be dominated by a foreign power was when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor - an attack that mostly succeeded because of poor preparation on the part of the military.

And if Americans had not "trusted" the government to respond to said attacks, they would never have mobilized behind the government and put everything they had into the defeat of the attacking Japanese. So history has examples of trusting government also being positive.

But again - Paranoid is as Paranoid does.

I wasn't talking about external threats, I was talking about the oppression of people by their own governments, the existence of which you apparently unaware of.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
The only way you can get away with labeling this "paranoia" is if you whitewash thousands of years of historical evidence that demonstrates the abusive and corrupt nature of centralized governments.

The stupidest, most anti-American argument one can make is "trust the government", since this country was founded on open revolution and skepticism towards government.

But you super smart, clever people keep acting like there isn't a mountain of evidence, both historical and contemporary, that proves how devious, corrupt, and abusive centralized governments can be. I wouldn't want to burst that fantasy bubble you're living in.


And yet, historically speaking, the closest the US has come to be dominated by a foreign power was when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor - an attack that mostly succeeded because of poor preparation on the part of the military.

And if Americans had not "trusted" the government to respond to said attacks, they would never have mobilized behind the government and put everything they had into the defeat of the attacking Japanese. So history has examples of trusting government also being positive.

But again - Paranoid is as Paranoid does.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Oh well. It's better to err on the side of liberty than it is to irrationally trust in the good intentions of the state.

You do realize that the military is conducting exercises all around the country? Sixty miles east of here is the Top Gun facility. Funny how the residents of Fallon aren't concerned.

Texas is part of the United States, so thinking that the US can take over itself is the pinnacle of irrationality.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Now I see the problem. I'm not a halfwit. LOL.

All I said was that given the immense powers the government has, it makes sense for people to want to keep an eye on it. It's not a very hard position to understand.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100


I agree. It's a painfully simple position that any halfwit should be able to understand.




Now I see the problem. I'm not a halfwit. LOL.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Nothing to decipher.

I agree. It's a painfully simple position that any halfwit should be able to understand.


You may not have said it., but the people leading the "surveilance" groups did say it,. and they had nothing to back it up with. That is why they are paranoid.


Oh well. It's better to err on the side of liberty than it is to irrationally trust in the good intentions of the state.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
I never said the purposes of these exercises was to kill or imprison Americans. I simply said that it's not paranoid to want to keep an eye on an institution that has those powers. It's a really simple position actually. Not sure why you're having such a hard time deciphering it.

You may not have said it., but the people leading the "surveilance" groups did say it,. and they had nothing to back it up with. That is why they are paranoid.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
The only way you can get away with labeling this "paranoia" is if you whitewash thousands of years of historical evidence that demonstrates the abusive and corrupt nature of centralized governments.

The stupidest, most anti-American argument one can make is "trust the government", since this country was founded on open revolution and skepticism towards government.

But you super smart, clever people keep acting like there isn't a mountain of evidence, both historical and contemporary, that proves how devious, corrupt, and abusive centralized governments can be. I wouldn't want to burst that fantasy bubble you're living in.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

I never said the purposes of these exercises was to kill or imprison Americans. I simply said that it's not paranoid to want to keep an eye on an institution that has those powers. It's a really simple position actually. Not sure why you're having such a hard time deciphering it.


Nothing to decipher.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Please. Then why the hell did you choose those words? Coin toss?


I never said the purposes of these exercises was to kill or imprison Americans. I simply said that it's not paranoid to want to keep an eye on an institution that has those powers. It's a really simple position actually. Not sure why you're having such a hard time deciphering it.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

I'm not wiggling out of anything. I never said that the military exercises were for the purpose of killing or imprisoning anyone. I simply said that it is not paranoid to want to keep an eye on the institution that has those powers and has historically abused them.

Please. Then why the hell did you choose those words? Coin toss?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
LOL. Riiiight. The government also has the legal authority to defend the nation, which is what the exercise is about. Your choice of words is obvious. Trying to wiggle out of it is absurd.


I'm not wiggling out of anything. I never said that the military exercises were for the purpose of killing or imprisoning anyone. I simply said that it is not paranoid to want to keep an eye on the institution that has those powers and has historically abused them.


Paranoia is imagination. Again, that's the whole point.

Not when it is based on thousands of years of historical evidence.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
can you imagine a special forces guy taking part in some sort of occupation of texas? buncha sickos.
Apparently, Texans think they are living in a foreign country. Sick is right. Pretty damn stupid as well.




I can imagine a military doing a lot of immoral things. It's not that hard if you know anything about history.

Paranoia is imagination. Again, that's the whole point.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

Never said that was what they were there for, just that it's not paranoid to want to keep an eye on the institution with the legal authority to kill, imprison, and tax people.

LOL. Riiiight. The government also has the legal authority to defend the nation, which is what the exercise is about. Your choice of words is obvious. Trying to wiggle out of it is absurd.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
can you imagine a special forces guy taking part in some sort of occupation of texas? buncha sickos.

I can imagine a military doing a lot of immoral things. It's not that hard if you know anything about history.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
The military does not have any authority on US soil.
It is illegal, per the constitution to have actively deploy troups for real time military operations. So, you would need all aspects of the government, including the GOP to willingly take part in order for this fantasy about the military being deployed to take over Texas.
By the way, we do not want Texas. Please stop breaking your promises to secede and do it already. Or we will send troups and force you out of the union.

 I never said they were trying to take over Texas. I just said it wasn't paranoid for citizens to want to keep an eye on their government.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Yep, that's the whole point. Thinking the military is there to kill and imprison people. Classic paranoia.

Never said that was what they were there for, just that it's not paranoid to want to keep an eye on the institution with the legal authority to kill, imprison, and tax people.



Paranoid is as Paranoid does.

How many soldiers FROM Texas will be taking part in the exercise? Thousands? Do you honestly think they would stay silent as
to intent?

Paranoid is as Paranoid does.

Totally agree. It's not like there has been hundreds of examples over history of governments abusing their authority or deceiving the citizenry. That kind of stuff never happens.

can you imagine a special forces guy taking part in some sort of occupation of texas? buncha sickos.
Pages:
Jump to: