Topic: "Text Analysis Confirms Craig Wright Is Not Satoshi Nakamoto." (Read 187 times)
^ I don't know why he would not stop doing so since no one believed in him from the day that he started doing so. The thread is an additional proof that he is not Satoshi and I think it would be better if we just ignore him at all because if we don't then I believe he will never stop thinking that he is gaining something on it if he continues to claim that he is Satoshi and someone is responding to him whether it is favorable to him or not. I think once we ignore him he will then stopped doing it since he will not benefit anything from it anymore.
November 03, 2020, 05:04:59 AM
This 'evidence' just shows that no way CSW could be Satoshi as it was proven in court that he is not. Yeah, we shouldn't give him attention here, but it's better that from time to time we have this kind of thread so that newbies here will really know what kind of fraud and self centered CSW is. Not just CSW but those individuals who claim that they are Satoshi.
November 02, 2020, 11:46:29 PM
I don't need to have this analysis to know that he was a crook. from the first glance, you will know he was just blabbering about rubbish claiming about the person he was not. But hey, some people actually believe him but those are only from those who follow him maybe got some payment or false promises from him. The least we can do is expose this crook every time he gives some claim about his identity cause he is just completely fake.
November 02, 2020, 09:25:44 PM
Even if text analysis, which might fundamentally not be very reliable, said that CWS is Satoshi, I still wouldn't believe it, because the evidence against it is just overwhelming - no keys, acting against Bitcoin's interests all the time, saying things that Satoshi would never say, like that Bitcoin is bad because it's used by criminals, his lack of actual technical knowledge. If some cultists still believe that CWS is Satoshi, this text analysis evidence is not going to change it.
November 02, 2020, 03:19:51 PM
Meehn are we all not already tired of talking about this Craig Wright, I thought everybody has forgotten about this guy, why bringing him up now lolz? Even without all these proof of a thing, we all are aware that he’s not the real Satoshi.
There has already been so many things to disprove his claims of being the real Satoshi Nakamoto and we have all got it, and the court has also said he’s not the one and he will likely be punished for it (if not already). Many of them have claimed to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, this Craig Wright is not the only one, they don’t even have access to the wallet that stores Satoshi's coins.
There has already been so many things to disprove his claims of being the real Satoshi Nakamoto and we have all got it, and the court has also said he’s not the one and he will likely be punished for it (if not already). Many of them have claimed to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, this Craig Wright is not the only one, they don’t even have access to the wallet that stores Satoshi's coins.
November 02, 2020, 01:57:06 PM
Perhaps we could get a body language expert to analyze this ...
- https://youtu.be/xVeoixuHQUw?t=1530
...
"Chillax man! ... Best of luck with decentralized on-chain yottabyte data storage and all that law stuff ... geez!" - SWIM
ROTFLSHMSFOAIDMT
- https://youtu.be/xVeoixuHQUw?t=1530
...
"Chillax man! ... Best of luck with decentralized on-chain yottabyte data storage and all that law stuff ... geez!" - SWIM
ROTFLSHMSFOAIDMT
November 02, 2020, 12:59:55 PM
Interesting to know the analysis which is results all negative but isn't necessary to discuss especially appearing the Bitcoin hater and impersonator of real Satoshi.
As always Craig Wright won't stop claiming himself as Satoshi Nakamoto because he still hopes that one of these days someone will believe in him but I'm pretty sure that day will not come any more for lots of evidence are now being laid in the court that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Right now what I'm thinking is why Craig Wright keeps on claiming this, because I know for a fact that if there is smoke then there is fire, so chances are there are still reasons behind for doing this. I don't think it is only because of the fame since he is now for claiming to be Satoshi yet never he was able to prove it.
As always Craig Wright won't stop claiming himself as Satoshi Nakamoto because he still hopes that one of these days someone will believe in him but I'm pretty sure that day will not come any more for lots of evidence are now being laid in the court that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Right now what I'm thinking is why Craig Wright keeps on claiming this, because I know for a fact that if there is smoke then there is fire, so chances are there are still reasons behind for doing this. I don't think it is only because of the fame since he is now for claiming to be Satoshi yet never he was able to prove it.
November 02, 2020, 12:39:53 PM
Man, like come on, it's 2020 and we're still talking about this irrelevant dude? It's not like we need extra proof to confirm that he isn't the real Satoshi.
Expect on 2021 which this again to be discussed. Its not really that needed for more analysis yet this had been prove out or pretty obvious that CW isnt satoshi but i do agree on what said above that this do really make those proof thicker but it isnt really that needed actually.
November 02, 2020, 12:31:03 PM
Man, like come on, it's 2020 and we're still talking about this irrelevant dude? It's not like we need extra proof to confirm that he isn't the real Satoshi.
November 02, 2020, 12:04:35 PM
i think craig already realized that no one will ever believe him which is why he already had stopped appearing on media. this text analysis i guess will push him down under.
that twitter link belongs to a user whos dedicated to look for satoshi. i'm curious if it will really point him to a person or probably a user in the forum that passed the analysis. although it won't be 100% but a probability is going to be interesting.
November 02, 2020, 11:44:39 AM
Do we even need to analyze it? Even quick glance at text written by Satoshi and faketoshi is enough to tell it belongs to different people.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
Yes we do and thicker 'proof' is continually required ...
...
IMHO, where possible, this entire industry must boycott everything and anything BSV. The same applies to BCH and to every other Bitcoin chain fork.
The real satoshi did not want Bitcoin forks ...
A second version would be a massive development and maintenance hassle for me. It's hard enough maintaining backward compatibility while upgrading the network without a second version locking things in. If the second version screwed up, the user experience would reflect badly on both, although it would at least reinforce to users the importance of staying with the official version. If someone was getting ready to fork a second version, I would have to air a lot of disclaimers about the risks of using a minority version. This is a design where the majority version wins if there's any disagreement, and that can be pretty ugly for the minority version and I'd rather not go into it, and I don't have to as long as there's only one version.
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
You can read every post that the real satoshi wrote on this forum (which is where some of the text based analysis in the OP is from) here;
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
I am a nobody but I never supported/used BCH/BSV and I always discouraged people who asked me to even think to getting any close to those projects. As you wrote, we now need to wait April 2021: that is very annoying.
November 02, 2020, 11:38:37 AM
I never thought Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. I can't conceive a mind, that had the vision and the drive to create Bitcoin and all that it represents, is so self-centered and in-search for fame. The bees always come to the honey.. Let's not start this discussion again, though. I am 100% sure that Craig is not Satoshi. It is an interesting analysis, though.
although it is annoying to see this scammers name here every now and then but i think it is a necessary evil because if we who know for a fact that he is a scammer stay silent then the large campaign of misinformation will convince the newcomers otherwise, and that is dangerous thing to let scammers do whatever they want.
November 02, 2020, 11:34:51 AM
I never thought Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto. I can't conceive a mind, that had the vision and the drive to create Bitcoin and all that it represents, is so self-centered and in-search for fame. The bees always come to the honey.. Let's not start this discussion again, though. I am 100% sure that Craig is not Satoshi. It is an interesting analysis, though.
November 02, 2020, 11:18:43 AM
It seems that all BSV people can do is troll their userbase about BTC. While Bitcoin developers are making BIPs, the BSV community isn’t doing anything productive with their time.
They are permanently stuck with debating about the 2008 whitepaper while we have advanced far beyond that with things like CoinJoin, LN and Segwit (and the latest feature in the works: Taproot). I don’t see BSV making comparable innovations.
They are permanently stuck with debating about the 2008 whitepaper while we have advanced far beyond that with things like CoinJoin, LN and Segwit (and the latest feature in the works: Taproot). I don’t see BSV making comparable innovations.
November 02, 2020, 10:36:14 AM
Seriously? Did anyone think otherwise? This was obvious from the beginning. Craig is not Satoshi.
Unfortunately, plenty of 'unknowing' BSV supporters do apparently think otherwise.
Newcomers to the 'Bitcoin' space also fall for this "nullity based on a sham".
Exchanges, BSV mining pools etc., are 'profiting' from this charade at the expense of original Bitcoin (BTC).
BSV and BCH are effectively financial derivatives of BTC. They quite literally 'steal' value and market share from the original.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(finance)
SEC enforcement, anyone ?
Again, justice for none!
November 02, 2020, 10:27:28 AM
Seriously? Did anyone think otherwise? This was obvious from the beginning. Craig is not Satoshi.
November 02, 2020, 10:21:38 AM
I guess the burden of proof is on Craig Wright. It means the effort should be exerted not to prove that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto but to prove that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto.
Of course it is better to have thick evidences to prove that CSW is indeed not Satoshi, but everything seems to be pointing to that fact already. And, on the contrary, there seems to be no single evidence to prove otherwise. So what is the reason for digging up some more evidences to prove to everybody that CSW is fake?
Of course it is better to have thick evidences to prove that CSW is indeed not Satoshi, but everything seems to be pointing to that fact already. And, on the contrary, there seems to be no single evidence to prove otherwise. So what is the reason for digging up some more evidences to prove to everybody that CSW is fake?
November 02, 2020, 10:09:33 AM
Do we even need to analyze it? Even quick glance at text written by Satoshi and faketoshi is enough to tell it belongs to different people.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
Yes we do and thicker 'proof' is continually required ...
These BSV asshats are constantly making unsubstantiated claims through 'fake news' outfits ... mixing (some) historical facts with total and utter fiction ... trying to change and/or to create a new historical narrative to fit with the BSV 'commercial' agenda ... it's despicable ...
- hxxps://coingeek.com/bitcoin-white-paper-day/
- hxxps://youtu.be/36MRO2izj6I?t=387
Quote CSW, 6:29 "... I didn't put a lot of detail in any section of the Bitcoin white paper ... "
and continues to speak 'technobabble' in regards to Digital Signatures, without being able to provide any cryptographically valid proof, to-date, whatsoever. Oh the irony! Funny how he seems to always be asking 'others' to do the 'work' for him. Word has it, he can't even code.
They are continuing with legal actions and legal threats against the original Bitcoin (BTC) community ...
- hxxps://coingeek.com/wright-victorious-peter-mccormack-abandons-libel-defence/
...
"Self-Proclaimed Satoshi Craig Wright Files US Copyright Registrations for BTC White Paper" ...
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/self-proclaimed-satoshi-craig-wright-files-us-copyright-registrations-for-btc-white-paper
Excerpt: "Registering a copyright is just filing a form. The Copyright Office does not investigate the validity of the claim; they just register it. Unfortunately there is no official way to challenge a registration. If there are competing claims, the Office will just register all of them."
...
"... "including the original Bitcoin whitepaper"
@CopyrightOffice might be interested in this. Craig Wright filed a false claim on the Bitcoin whitepaper over there last year." ..."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1323155680161923074
...
IMHO, where possible, this entire industry must boycott everything and anything BSV. The same applies to BCH and to every other Bitcoin chain fork.
The real satoshi did not want Bitcoin forks ...
A second version would be a massive development and maintenance hassle for me. It's hard enough maintaining backward compatibility while upgrading the network without a second version locking things in. If the second version screwed up, the user experience would reflect badly on both, although it would at least reinforce to users the importance of staying with the official version. If someone was getting ready to fork a second version, I would have to air a lot of disclaimers about the risks of using a minority version. This is a design where the majority version wins if there's any disagreement, and that can be pretty ugly for the minority version and I'd rather not go into it, and I don't have to as long as there's only one version.
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
...snip...
You can read every post that the real satoshi wrote on this forum (which is where some of the text based analysis in the OP is from) here;
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
...
*Satire*
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly - The Final Duel (1966 HD)
- https://youtu.be/aJCSNIl2Pls
November 02, 2020, 07:58:31 AM
Thank you for posting this informative data in this forum. Craig Wright is really a funny person and that he is really making efforts to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto and even using false and fake evidences just so he can have a patent on bitcoin. The biq question for me is who is behind Craig Wright and why did he did such things? But luckily anyway he has proven anything and bitcoins future would be terrible if it falls on his hand.
November 02, 2020, 07:30:47 AM
Do we even need to analyze it? Even quick glance at text written by Satoshi and faketoshi is enough to tell it belongs to different people.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
But at very least it'll make the proof thicker.
Jump to: