I apologize for not specifying, but I am talking about the poor countries in Africa. You both took the example of El Salvador. But no matter what happens, I think there will always be a difference.
Regardless of the country I don't think this will be a source of conflict regardless of poor or rich countries trying to adopt bitcoin as legal tender all will be the same.Pros and cons are likely to occur but that does not mean a conflict that can split a country because after all when pros and cons exist then it is a natural thing but when this triggers a prolonged conflict I think it is too much especially when we know that when a country implements regulations on bitcoin as one of the legal means of payment in the end it is only optional as an option because after all the means of payment on fiat still applies here.
Things that make it complicated are when a country that is infiltrated by some people who have a desire because they don't really understand how bitcoin works that muddies the atmosphere (usually like that) because when ordinary people or don't know about bitcoin sometimes they won't care too much and are neutral but it will be different when there are some people who have an interest for the benefit of a thing will definitely try to muddy the atmosphere by considering bitcoin negative.
