Laws are made by people for people. People are people whether or not they make any laws. When the laws that some people make become repugnant to other people, why shouldn't the other people remake the laws into laws that they like for themselves? Because franky1 wants to keep them in slavery?
Realize that it is seldom that the lawmakers keep their own laws.
if those that cant make the laws dont like the laws. then they can and should do things to not cause the laws to be strengthened.
by disobeying a law will make that law become more restrictive.
EG gun control would not be an issue if people were not stupidly walking down a street waving a gun around screaming 'im open carrying coz republic'.. if they instead just kept their gun secure and only used/handled it when actually needed/appropriate. basically in places where it wont frighten other people.. then they woud find that they would not be questioned about their handling of their gun
its like the common sense is to not pull down your pants and do a crap in the middle of the street.
if idiots then started crapping in the middle of the street. laws would be strengthened to make that act a criminal offense.
however if people just didnt do it. out of respect for their fellow citizens. then it wont be an issue
but we all know badecker will now start pushing out his feacal matter in public just to cause chaos to those watching and to the street and to cause new laws to be enforced about doing a crap in public.
Everybody makes laws all the time. Mostly these laws are the common law... what kind of clothes they will wear to church, standard breakfast menu at home, walk to work or drive, general respect towards friends and neighbors, etc., etc.
In common law countries - like the USA, the UK, Canada, Belize, Australia, and a few more - the laws are for citizens (you mentioned citizens in a different post). Men and women can exercise citizenship, but they can stand as man/woman not under citizenship. When they are brought to court, they have the right to stand as they wish regarding this status, but only in common law countries.
Government laws apply to citizens. But in common law countries, government laws don't apply to men and women except under two circumstances:
1. The man/woman in question voluntarily accepts the position of citizenship;
2. The man/woman in question has harmed someone or damaged his property.
The problem that makes people fight government is that they don't know this. They don't realize that they don't have to stand as citizens. The few who DO know, don't understand how to stand as man/woman in court when the court tries to force them to be citizens. Government likes it this way, because they can make lots of money off their citizen-slaves this way.
Now, my experience has been that you don't like this idea. But liking it or not has to do with the fact that you don't like me. It doesn't have to do with the fact that people make this work all the time in the courts. Much of the time the judges/magistrates back off when they see the people going this direction. But they back off mostly so that the people won't find out how it really works.
I have talked a lot about Karl Lentz in the past. He uses the common law process. Check out his info here -
https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos - and do searches on "Karl Lentz common law."
Lately I have found this website -
https://awarriorcalls.com/a-warrior-calls-landing-page/ - where the main guy is doing similar to Karl, actively helping others.