Pages:
Author

Topic: The Biggest Pyramid Scheme Ever Devised! - page 3. (Read 13032 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
It's an accounting system. There are no dollars in fact. There are debits and credits, and some debits are represented by those FRNs. If one is burned, or destroyed, the system adjusts itself, because at the end of the day, all accounts are "zero".

The fact that you have been left with a few of those pieces of paper is not an issue. One day they will be spent, and when they are spent, they are headed back to the Federal Reserve.
So, in other words, you have no answer? You said those dollars are "theirs, not yours"... except you never actually have to give them back. You can spend them, giving them to someone else, and they don't have to give them back to the Federal Reserve either. "If it does not return to the Fed before you die, it's collected afterwards"... over a period of decades or centuries, as they change hands over and over and over and a fraction of them are paid in taxes each time (just like they would be if they were backed by gold).

Don't you think it's a little dishonest to throw around loaded phrases like "borrowed money" and "theirs, not yours" when the actual meaning you have in mind is so tame?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251
It's borrowed money. If it does not return to the Fed before you die, it's collected afterwards. Eventually, it goes back to the Fed, because it's theirs, not yours.
It's collected afterwards? When, and by whom?

If you're referring to taxes, doesn't that mean a gold-backed currency is also "borrowed money" since you still have to pay taxes with it?

It's an accounting system. There are no dollars in fact. There are debits and credits, and some debits are represented by those FRNs. If one is burned, or destroyed, the system adjusts itself, because at the end of the day, all accounts are "zero".

The fact that you have been left with a few of those pieces of paper is not an issue. One day they will be spent, and when they are spent, they are headed back to the Federal Reserve.

Second point, the gold question.
No, the congress, authorized to coin money, would use the gold to back the fiat currency, making it somewhat stable and insured. Currently, the public Treasury borrows from the private fed.


Wiki
A double-entry bookkeeping system is a set of rules for recording financial information in a financial accounting system in which every transaction or event changes at least two different nominal ledger accounts.

The name derives from the fact that financial information used to be recorded using pen and ink in paper books - hence "bookkeeping" (whereas now it's recorded mainly in computer systems) and that these books were called journals and ledgers (hence nominal ledger, etc.) - and that each transaction was recorded twice (hence "double-entry"), with the two transactions being called a "debit" and a "credit".

It was first codified in the 15th century. In modern accounting this is done using debits and credits within the accounting equation: Equity = Assets - Liabilities. The accounting equation serves as an error detection system: if at any point the sum of debits does not equal the corresponding sum of credits, an error has occurred. It follows that the sum of debits and credits must be equal. --

(Federal Reserve Keeps a Double Entry Bookeeping system)
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
It's borrowed money. If it does not return to the Fed before you die, it's collected afterwards. Eventually, it goes back to the Fed, because it's theirs, not yours.
It's collected afterwards? When, and by whom?

If you're referring to taxes, doesn't that mean a gold-backed currency is also "borrowed money" since you still have to pay taxes with it?
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
But you are saying that the US treasury doesn't take all the profits which was made mostly from the US treasury?



look, we can't teach you the complexities of economics on this thread alone.  you will have to do alot of reading and studying on your own time if you want to understand what money is.  it takes a LONG time and this thread is getting too long too.

i would start by reading the Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin and then move to Mises.org for an understanding of the gold standard.

But it's backed by the full faith and credit of the USA... That all you need to know.  What could possibly be wrong with that?
full member
Activity: 142
Merit: 100
.
..
...
....
.....
......
(I wrote a few lines, then decided I won't bother and deleted them)



Lots of winners in this thread. Carry on.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251


Goofy...the $10,000 IS THE TAX, as it must be returned to the Treasury. When it's returned, that a Tax Return.

LOL and please tell me, when exactly do I need to return my $10,000 to the treasury? Which agency, or court, is going to order me to do so?

It's borrowed money. If it does not return to the Fed before you die, it's collected afterwards. Eventually, it goes back to the Fed, because it's theirs, not yours.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack


Goofy...the $10,000 IS THE TAX, as it must be returned to the Treasury. When it's returned, that a Tax Return.

LOL and please tell me, when exactly do I need to return my $10,000 to the treasury? Which agency, or court, is going to order me to do so?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
If the new money is a liability, who is it a liability to? I think it's actually a fake liability to hide the masses of new money they make. A form of window dressing. But am I right. The money is owed to the government or something? That would make it even more insane and complicated.

its confusing b/c its a circle jerk.  US Treasury issues debt which is then monetized by Fed printing which means the new USD are backed by that same UST debt which the issuance of devalues the printed USD's. 

this is why the avg person doesn't understand money.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251

A person who holds $10,000 in federal reserve notes, holds $10,000 in debt, and owes taxes on that sum.


That is patently false. Please point out ANY law, stipulation, legislation, court order, or even an op-ed that suggests one owes taxes on money he/she already possesses. You get taxed on income, yes, but once you have $10,000 after that income taxation, it is YOURS and nobody has a claim to it.

Did Alex Jones tell you this?!

Goofy...the $10,000 IS THE TAX, as it must be returned to the Treasury. When it's returned, that a Tax Return.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
If the new money is a liability, who is it a liability to? I think it's actually a fake liability to hide the masses of new money they make. A form of window dressing. But am I right. The money is owed to the government or something? That would make it even more insane and complicated.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack

A person who holds $10,000 in federal reserve notes, holds $10,000 in debt, and owes taxes on that sum.


That is patently false. Please point out ANY law, stipulation, legislation, court order, or even an op-ed that suggests one owes taxes on money he/she already possesses. You get taxed on income, yes, but once you have $10,000 after that income taxation, it is YOURS and nobody has a claim to it.

Did Alex Jones tell you this?!
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
I understand gold as money. I don't understand the million complexities of the federal reserve.

listen to the Khan Academy video i posted up for you.  if you understand how the Feds balance sheet works then you're golden.

FRN's are liabilities (Right side) backed by US Treasuries (left side=assets) which are debt backed by the sweat equity of the US taxpayer.  the asset side used to be gold (hard currency).  thats all you need to know.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
I understand gold as money. I don't understand the million complexities of the federal reserve.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
But you are saying that the US treasury doesn't take all the profits which was made mostly from the US treasury?



look, we can't teach you the complexities of economics on this thread alone.  you will have to do alot of reading and studying on your own time if you want to understand what money is.  it takes a LONG time and this thread is getting too long too.

i would start by reading the Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin and then move to Mises.org for an understanding of the gold standard.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
But you are saying that the US treasury doesn't take all the profits which was made mostly from the US treasury?

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251
Hold on, the federal reserve balance sheet has the printed money down as a liability? What the heck? I guess this is just window dressing lies?

Apparently the Bank of England also owns some of the federal reserve in the US. :O

Is this true.

The Rothschilds group makes profit on this scam?

Some people say all the profits from the federal reserve go to the Us treasury. Heh, if that were true, why make money on the US treasury just to give it back?

It gets weirder and weirder the more you look at it.

I've been looking closely at it, for nearly 20 years now. Yes, it is weird, but not if you understand it.
Most people are just not awake to it yet.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
Hold on, the federal reserve balance sheet has the printed money down as a liability? What the heck? I guess this is just window dressing lies?

Apparently the Bank of England also owns some of the federal reserve in the US. :O

Is this true.

The Rothschilds group makes profit on this scam?

Some people say all the profits from the federal reserve go to the Us treasury. Heh, if that were true, why make money on the US treasury just to give it back?

It gets weirder and weirder the more you look at it.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251
The US Treasury paying the federal reserve for the loans it gives out which aren't proper loans anymore.

Could it get any worse?

"your USD"

I don't have any USD. I have GBP and investments in certain securities. Looking to make investments into bitcoin with a trading algorithm I have not finished yet.

The banks that are "members" or whatever get dividends from the system right? The government stops the federal reserve from keeping all the printed money for itself and forces it to lend and relend, yet allows some profit from the system? Why doesn't the new money go into the net assets, it becomes a liability as well somehow?

I'm getting a bit confused.

Look at it this way.....since the Rothschilds got the monopoly on central and private banking, all money created today by them, is created as a loan or extension of their credit. All governments borrow from them, through the IMF. All money used today, must therefore accrue interest which must be paid back to them. So, therefore all money today, is actually "debt".

The only way to break that cycle, is for a living, breathing, real man, to use his own signature to extend his own credit into the system. That becomes a (+) injected in, instead of a (-), which all money currently falls under. It's all debits, instead of credits. It's that simple.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251
and if the US Dollar has value and is not, in fact, debt....
then, can anyone explain to me how the us debt clock http://www.usdebtclock.org claims this?



You are still spouting nonsense in between your otherwise valid comments. The US dollar is not equivalent to debt. They are different things. A man with a bank account of $10,000 is NOT in an identical financial position to a man with a bank account of -$10,000. Your theory suggests that dollars=equal debt, and thus the two men are equivalent. That doesn't pass the straight-face test, let alone the more important test of reason. Dollars have value because you can exchange them for things. Will that be true in 10 years? Maybe not. But right now, they have value. They are not debt. They are assets of the bearer (but yes - depreciating assets).

Consider if the US was still on a gold standard, so that dollars were fixed to gold. The US Gov could STILL be trillions of dollars in debt, and we could still see the US Debt Clock in much the same manner. Your example is silly.

Thankfully, under a gold standard, a huge debt would encourage gold reserves to leave the country, thus curtailing the debt (this is why gov's don't like gold standards).

You are wrong. Sorry to be the one to point it out for you.
A person who holds $10,000 in federal reserve notes, holds $10,000 in debt, and owes taxes on that sum.
A person owes $10,000 in just in deeper debt, that's all.

Person A must rid himself of his obligations in order to not hold that debt.
Person B must acquire $10,000 in debt and use it to discharge his $10,000 debt that is already owed.

Both person A and Person B are $10,000 in debt, the only difference is, Person A has the $10,000 to pay it back.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 251
The dollars which came from someone that owed them back, isn't owed back by you. It's owed back by the borrower.

Quote
yes in normal times.  but since 1913 the Fed has gradually relaxed this rule allowing a slow decline in the value of the USD to "help" Wall St.  the mirror image of this is inflation.  but since 2007, the Fed has ENORMOUSLY violated this rule by in fact permanently buying bad collateral (loans) from its member banks.

You mean it has had a relaxed policy on the repayment if loans?



The simple fact of the matter is, ...that borrower is the person who holds those federal reserve notes. Since the notes are borrowed.
Pages:
Jump to: