I think the PDF and the huge overhead editorship hierarchy is a repeat of Bitcoin Weekly's mistakes.
Problem with editors is that they're only one person, with only a limited viewpoint. They're also a bottleneck in the production of content.
My operation is a 3 tiered hierarchy. Freelancers, staff writers, and the editor-in-chief. My role is more of a combat support role. I administer payment, hire people, advertise, and write code. I plan to either eliminate these roles or delegate them.
I want the good people of Bitcoin Weekly to be fighter pilots, not drones who are completely incapable of functioning without getting approval for anything.
Problem with PDF is that they're not as linkable and you can't comment on them.
Problem with editors is that they're only one person, with only a limited viewpoint. They're also a bottleneck in the production of content.
My operation is a 3 tiered hierarchy. Freelancers, staff writers, and the editor-in-chief. My role is more of a combat support role. I administer payment, hire people, advertise, and write code. I plan to either eliminate these roles or delegate them.
I want the good people of Bitcoin Weekly to be fighter pilots, not drones who are completely incapable of functioning without getting approval for anything.
Problem with PDF is that they're not as linkable and you can't comment on them.
Hmm, I read both... The Bitcoin sun is nice as I can just get all the news round-up in one hit... except it really should be on paper, something that you read when having your morning coffee. I that an iPad app would be great... (for those who have one of those stupid apple-jail products).
The Bitcoin Weekly, is cool as it is very minimalist and 'just works'... I that there is much that The Bitcoin Sun could learn from such a site.
(inventive strategy!) 
