Oh come on.
Yes I agree this is an important issue. But do we really need 100 Threads about this?
There are some interesting discussions going on about this topic and with more and more threads it gets impossible to keep track.
Also you are paranoid (again):
Whoever runs bitcoin.org runs bitcoin. Unfortunately bitcoin is not decentralized in this regard. At any moment, whoever runs that site can put up Bitcoin 0.9.0, call it an urgent release and dispose of the block limit.
No in order to raise the Block limit, pools would need to change their version, too.
They tend to not upgrade until a new version is considered save.
Chances are most of the network would upgrade to it with no questions ask. All the naysayers would be left in the dust and with a fork that wouldn't even be worth a nickel per coin.
Yes, put these new nodes would still accept the smaller blocks as well. It will only work, when the longer chain created consist of larger blocks.
I'm sorry. The war is lost. Unless one of you buys out bitcoin.org or defames it to the point that it drops off the front page of Google. There is too much lobbying pressure from Mt.Gox, SatoshiDice and others for the block limit to remain.
Which war? I don't see burning servers and dead Bitcoiners on the streets.
And I have jet to see a single statement about this from SD or GOX.