some of us here understand the value of the bitcoin distinct form the price of btc to paper money.
if you base the value of BTC in USD or some other centralized government regulated paper currency you are missing the point.
Bitcoin is effectively a fiat token with some hard money properties. It does not meet any economic definition of a money. It's not even a commodity. The only thing you can do with a bitcoin is send it to another bitcoin address. It's becoming apparent to more and more people that bitcoin is merely a fad among a few geeks that just like to play with it, and that it was/is misunderstood by tens/hundreds of thousands of people (and continues to be misunderstood by most that remain in the community) to be something most people would value. This is what caused it's large price increase into the $30s when people expected the mainstream attention to result in bitcoin catching on. (It hasn't yet, and most likely won't, and is currently teetering on the brink of a catastrophic collapse where the price becomes too low to make mining profitable, resulting in extremely slow block generation/confirmations, which will make it even worse as a form of payment, thereby hurting it's value and price further.) I have yet to see a single bitcoin developer (or anyone, whether inside or outside the bitcoin community, for that matter) express accurate understanding of bitcoin's economic value and how to take advantage of it. Eventually most bitcoin users will find that, at least in it's current form, the only value of bitcoin to them is to try to acquire as much profit as they can in terms of government fiat currency and/or other goods from bitcoin before it collapses to whatever price those few bitcoin geeks will pay for them.
Paragraph breaks are your friend. As would be a coherent logical structure. But no matter, the substance of your post is worse than the style.
What "economic definition of money" are you talking about? Medium of exchange? Check. Unit of account? Check. Store of value? Check.
Sending to another address is enough. What more do you want? Are you sad that you can't draw a mustache on George?
Apparent ≠ true.
The doomsday scenario where miners all just disappear is just as silly when you say it as it was when the other dozen folks said it.
I have a very good idea of bitcoin's economic value, and how to take advantage of it. But my ideas aren't mine alone, so if you haven't seen them elsewhere, I suspect the problem is that
you have a different view, and you are unable to imagine a different view.
Anything that I didn't address directly was baseless conjecture, unless I missed a valid point buried in that wall of text.
Oh, and namecoin isn't bitcoin. Just FYI.