Topic: The Crypto Trinity (BTC, LTC, XRC) - page 2. (Read 21566 times)

Bitcoin Soon can`t be part of Trinity. Maybe Monero, Dash, Ethereum. But not your with slow development coin.

Come and join our community at discord: https://discord.gg/WmxceSm or twitter: https://twitter.com/BitCoinRh
Crypto Trinity news are coming...

From p2pb2b news:
Cryptocurrencies that can be used not only as a payment method, but as a profitable digital asset, are in demand among modern traders. Such coins can become an investment element along with BTC and p2pb2b is about to list one of them.

Bitcoin Rhodium is a cryptocurrency that meets all the requirements of traders who are looking for a long-term investment opportunity in digital assets. Despite the name, the coin claims not to be a fork of Bitcoin. The number of BTR is limited to only 2,1 mln. One of the distinguishing features of the BTR ecosystem is its Strong Hands programme. Thanks to that partnership plan, coin holders can earn up to 30% of reward on BTR every year. The coin also responds to the latest demands of the crypto market by providing a highly-technical digital asset. BTR is based on POW X13 protocol, has a 4MB block size and provides safe and anonymous transactions.

Stay tuned with p2pb2b and do not miss BTR listing date!

As I wrote we bet on quality, no rush no fast decisions... but if you come to our community channels, every day there is something new;)

You are absolutely right that development hasn't been quick but why would you possible want a quick development which inevitably leads to needing more bug fixes when we have been in an almost year long bear market?

Not rushing the coin to market just demonstrates the commitment of the dev team and preference to launch it at the right time rather than too early just so they could make a quick buck...

Thus Crypto Trinity stuff must be something cool and good right?
I mean it has nice little pyramid graphic,
it has bitcoin name inside... and its not bitcoin fork,
and it also has image of man with tools in hand https://www.bitcoinrh.org/

But no more, than a year work get only web wallet and centralised pool. I wait a qt like wallet.
The development is very very slow. I don`t wrote about bad coin or not. I wrote about very slow team. Not a day, but more than a year. Think about it.

Of course the block frequency increased as the net hashrate increased then slowed down again as the difficulty adjusted. Not sure what your point is there?

Again not sure of what your complaint is with regard to the wallet - there is a web wallet now and an electrum one coming very soon. Do you want a third option?

Every coin starts as being centralised - if the code is released too early then that makes bug fixing a nightmare with having to get multiple pools/exchanges/standalone wallets to update to the latest release. The devs are doing absolutely the right thing by not rushing to release the code. If you don't like that then maybe just come back in two or three months?

The exchange is Bisq which personally no I don't really like. It is a reliable exchange though and you always have the option of OTC through the Discord channel if you want to buy/sell - thousands of BTR have successfully been traded there. No idea what you mean by 'is exchange associated with pools?' AFAIK the BTR dev team have nothing to do with Bisq other than having their coin listed there.

Overall I really don't understand what you are complaining about - this is a new coin and is actively being developed. If you want/expect multiple exchanges and wallets to be in place on day 1 then you simply have unrealistic expectations.

I am not forgot. The chain is stable? On the start blocks were rare, then after ASICs come to the pool blocks were extremely fast. Do you ever think about stability? But in other ways the chain is stable.
About chain I wrote earlier. Wallet, only web wallet! Only one centralised pool! Exchange? Do you think its a good exchange?
Electrum wallet is good, will be wait. Why do you think that exchange allow pools? Is exchange associated with pools? Its interesting.
Market a bear, you are right in it.

You have forgotten about the fully functioning and stable chain they have alse produced - fairly important wouldn't you say?

So, they have a clear use case, chain, wallet, pool, exchange - all of the things that a coin needs to have value, exist, work and be traded.

Electrum wallet due this month, a second exchange in Q1 2019, source code to be released after the exchange which will allow more pools.

Bearing in mind we have been in a bear market for most of 2018, what else exactly would you like to have seen accomplished by this stage which would have caused significantly more progress for the project?

Try to read answers which wrote earlier. More than year athe team released only web wallet, one centralised pool. Bisq is not a classic exchange.

Thanks and come and join our community at discord: https://discord.gg/WmxceSm
Or twitter: https://twitter.com/BitCoinRh

promising idea
trying the team
I want to watch about that
it should be successful after some time

Font size fixed...

Premine is completely reasonable - you would prefer a project where the dev team has no incentive to work or make it a success? Would you invest in a company where the management team had no investment in it?

Knowing exactly how much hashrate we have on the pool (and we are nothing to do with the dev team) I can categorically state that you have just made your last statement up - a great way to undermine anything else you may post



As an aside - why does a bear market bring out so many 'experts' and fudders? It's almost as if people are so bitter that their past investments were bad choices that they now don't want anyone to succeed...

Speed is relative - what do you think they are 'very very slow' compared to?

If you are thinking of a copy/paste coin which adds nothing new to crypto or a fork then I'd agree but say you are comparing apples to oranges. Learn a bit about the project, you may actually realise the potential it has 

And very very slow.

Devs are communicative on their discord channel...i suppose it is not a big corporate dev team

I think even the dev team would admit that the timeline hasn't been quick but as said before - it's a new blockchain written from scratch in C#, not a fork or a copy/paste as 99.9% of other altcoins are and which offer nothing new.

Slow progress isn't indicative of a scam, the complete opposite is more likely to be true - scam coins are copy/paste ones which takes about an hour and any development team which has been dedicated enough to work on a project for a year and shown their competence by having a working and stable chain at the end of that is the most exciting new development since BTC and ETH wrote their code.

Nothing has been lost by waiting out the bear market and making sure the code is working well - I'd take that a sign of a mature and patient team behind the project.

Updated Roadmap and website looks awesome. Kudos.

Introductory video, fantabulous.

Stronghands and cryptotrinity, phenomenal.

Metal Market , Again WOW.

All we need is to wait for Q1 .

is the timeline really slow? i believe that makes others perceive it as a scam.  what could be the possible reason of the slow-paced development, if it is?