I think there should be some serious consideration about switching the hashing algorithm before the Scrypt ASICs come out.
While the community is still young and we are on minimal exchanges we should do a hard-fork to Scrypt-N, Scrypt Jane, or X11 since we won't have to do a mass effort to reach out to a bunch of exchange operators or an overwhelming community base. Everything is tight-knit right now.
I think it's important to consider that we aren't a pure crypto-focused coin. Some coins can easily do hard-forks and get the community to switch because they are the people that are heavily involved in the crypto scene. I've donated FUNK to people that would be pissed at me for telling them to switch to a new wallet, because of some "technical" change in the background. They won't understand it. An example of this was Dogecoin's difficulty to get people to switch to 1.6. A large portion of Dogecoin's base is non-crypto.
It's also important to consider changes carefully. The more it changes the more effort it is: especially for the non-crypto people involved in the community. I'm still not sold on scrypt-N (asics are coming out that have changeable parameters precisely for that). Scrypt-N is also a memory hog, that could possibly make it unfeasible for the average joe to stay on board [more energy for less proof-of-work], resulting in unprofitable equipment. X11 does sound interesting (power saving for one), although it, in itself is also not ASIC-resistant as each algo is ASIC-able.
It doesn't say much of a coin that changes willy-nilly and makes previous holders of FUNK unable to use their currency. There's no silver bullet. For example, while KGW enables faster diff adjustments, but it is not so SPV-friendly. It drains battery substantially more (which I've discovered now while developing the android wallet). While there's no clear silver bullet, I'm wary to change unless it is absolutely necessary.
I suspect once we have web wallet support, the crypto-side of the project (miners and early adopters) can change more fluidly (changing reference and light wallets), but now it is a bit more difficult.
To conclude. We are heavily involved in the crypto-side. We love figuring out the nitty-gritty and keeping up to tabs on the various algos. It's fun! But this community encompasses soooo much more. Technical aficionados (like us), musicians, fans, speculators, etc. It's probably the first crypto-focused project that by definition is MORE than just a coin. I suspect we will see a lot of new projects follow our lead. Part of this means keeping it as user-friendly as possible. There are ways to make it easier though (if we do want to change in the future). I'm going to try and include a notification feature.
We don't need to change unless it is extremely pressing. We should rather focus on community building (tipping, telling musicians about it, etc) and infrastructure development (more exchanges, more innovative service, more projects). It's perhaps more difficult and requires more hard work, but the reward is so much greater. A community of awesome people, making awesome music with people across the world.
That's my perspective. And it shouldn't be the defacto one. So what do you guys think? Thoughts?
btw. n00bnoxious. Need to send the tipbot bounty to you.