The attacker did it again: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4p9z93/it_seems_attacker_just_targeted_the_whitehatdaos/
The market reacts:
http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/the-dao/
Topic: The DAO FAIL - page 10. (Read 20467 times)
The attacker did it again: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4p9z93/it_seems_attacker_just_targeted_the_whitehatdaos/
...and once we're done with hand-waving and mouth-foaming, we're left with cold, hard facts:
http://coinmarketcap.com/
http://coinmarketcap.com/
READ THE FINE PRINT
The Bitcoin or the Etheruem are still at the early stages of developments. They need improvement. Hard fork is necessary.
By definition a "hard fork" would require every node to upgrade their software.
Read the links provided. A hard fork is a hard fork. Downgrade; upgrade. Same difference. A handful of guys got together on IRC & decided to change shit. Like so:
I will not engage you any further, you have an ugly habit of blackmailing people when you do not get your way.
Consider yourself ignored.
I can believe verifiable facts, or I can take your erroneous claim on trust, random guy from the internet.
EDIT: And btw, my real name is in my nickname (Spartak or.. Spartacus) and I am using a real picture for avatar. You are the "random guy from the Internet", not me.
By definition a "hard fork" would require every node to upgrade their software.
(that didn't happen back then - what happened was that some pools decided to downgrade their software because of an issue with the DB that was being used at the time to store blocks)
(that didn't happen back then - what happened was that some pools decided to downgrade their software because of an issue with the DB that was being used at the time to store blocks)
^ This. But the troll is too busy trolling and he doesn't check his "facts"....
I can believe verifiable facts, or I can take your erroneous claim on trust, random guy from the internet.
EDIT: And btw, my real name is in my nickname (Spartak or.. Spartacus) and I am using a real picture for avatar. You are the "random guy from the Internet", not me.
By definition a "hard fork" would require every node to upgrade their software.
(that didn't happen back then - what happened was that some pools decided to downgrade their software because of an issue with the DB that was being used at the time to store blocks)
(that didn't happen back then - what happened was that some pools decided to downgrade their software because of an issue with the DB that was being used at the time to store blocks)
Right, and 2+2 doesn't equal 4. Very convincing 
I can believe verifiable facts, or I can take your erroneous claim on trust, random guy from the internet.
Why is it that every time I try to educate and enlighten the bitcoin fandom, I'm met with so much anger and resistance? You know that refusing to accept the facts, no matter how unpleasant and inconvenient they may be, won't make them go away, right?
Denial is not a healthy coping mechanism, mainly due to the fact that reality will inevitably rear its ugly head sooner or later, no matter how adamantly you choose to deny it.
I can believe verifiable facts, or I can take your erroneous claim on trust, random guy from the internet.
Why is it that every time I try to educate and enlighten the bitcoin fandom, I'm met with so much anger and resistance? You know that refusing to accept the facts, no matter how unpleasant and inconvenient they may be, won't make them go away, right?
Denial is not a healthy coping mechanism, mainly due to the fact that reality will inevitably rear its ugly head sooner or later, no matter how adamantly you choose to deny it.
Bitcoin was hardforked before, because a handful of guys agreed to do it. lrn ur history.
Really? Can you tell me when exactly was hard forked? Looks like I forgot about that......
Looks like you never knew about that, here: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/36090/has-a-hard-fork-ever-occurred
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-network-shaken-by-blockchain-fork-1363144448
Bitcoin was hardforked before, because a handful of guys agreed to do it. lrn ur history.
Really? Can you tell me when exactly was hard forked? Looks like I forgot about that......
....
^ Typical forum troll. Let's get into "dicksizing" then. The price of Bitcoin was even $614 on BTC-e, but so what? You do realize that I started this topic 12 days ago? Can you enlight us what happened 4 days ago? Ah, yes... The DAO was screwed with $78 million (at the time of the attack). What they are trying to do now? To fork it! Do you know what that means? It means that they will prove it has central authority. What does DAO stand for?
I don't consider myself as a bitcoiner, nor I am against ETH/DAO. I am just for a "better crypto-world"...
Bitcoin was hardforked before, because a handful of guys agreed to do it. lrn ur history.
As far as that decentralization/no central authority backstory? You actually think it's 4realz?
Girlfriend please! This is how your fate is decided:
>What does DAO stand for?
What does BTC stand for? It stands for a tradable asset, a less stigmatic form of gambling on the interweb.
That way we can tell friends & family we're entrepreneurs, maybe traders. Not degenerate gamblers.
....
^ Typical forum troll. Let's get into "dicksizing" then. The price of Bitcoin was even $614 on BTC-e, but so what? You do realize that I started this topic 12 days ago? Can you enlight us what happened 4 days ago? Ah, yes... The DAO was screwed with $78 million (at the time of the attack). What they are trying to do now? To fork it! Do you know what that means? It means that they will prove it has central authority. What does DAO stand for?
I don't consider myself as a bitcoiner, nor I am against ETH/DAO. I am just for a "better crypto-world"...
^Typical bitcoiner has-been. Swills shitty beer & reminisces about your retrocoin's glory days 
Times change, granddad, the past is the past. You had a good run, but you let it slip away, rested on your laurels a bit too long, failed to disrupt and innovate.
Now get that dangerous bitcoin contraption off the road, pops, you know how this ends.
P.S. If you really want to get into dicksizing, ETH is up x10 this year alone. Bitcoin? Oh yeah, crashing on BFX as we speak, $650
P.P.S. Fixed your chart, because don't care about bitcoin market cap increasing due to printing bitcoins out of thin air.
Times change, granddad, the past is the past. You had a good run, but you let it slip away, rested on your laurels a bit too long, failed to disrupt and innovate.
Now get that dangerous bitcoin contraption off the road, pops, you know how this ends.
P.S. If you really want to get into dicksizing, ETH is up x10 this year alone. Bitcoin? Oh yeah, crashing on BFX as we speak, $650
P.P.S. Fixed your chart, because don't care about bitcoin market cap increasing due to printing bitcoins out of thin air.
Here it is:
I think the "hacker" or the DAO holders are trying their best to persuade the miners to work in their favour.
Indeed . The Daoattacker is playing with ethereum devs and staying one step ahead-
http://pastebin.com/9MRVDC9h
|   | |
I think the "hacker" or the DAO holders are trying their best to persuade the miners to work in their favour.
Indeed . The Daoattacker is playing with ethereum devs and staying one step ahead-
http://pastebin.com/9MRVDC9h
That could be a scam. You send bitcoin, DAO or Etheruem to them, but they might not send the in contracts.
Has anybody in the forum tried to contact the hacker and get 20x profit? It seems too good to be true. Why did not the hacker keep the 20x profit to themselves.
I think the "hacker" or the DAO holders are trying their best to persuade the miners to work in their favour.
Indeed . The Daoattacker is playing with ethereum devs and staying one step ahead-
http://pastebin.com/9MRVDC9h
That could be a scam. You send bitcoin, DAO or Etheruem to them, but they might not send the in contracts.
Jump to: