Pages:
Author

Topic: The Day WoodCollector Was Banned - Commemorative (HAND CARVED) Plaque (Read 1307 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 530
$5 24k Gold FREE 4 sign-up! Mene.com/invite/h5ZRRP
Awesome work BG4, fuckin hilarious! As someone who followed the WoodCollector drama from day one, I laughed out loud at this.

HUGE lol and Bonus Points for having the QR code lead to the "Buried Treasure" thread!!  Cheesy  Grin
That thread was the biggest & most obvious bullshit joke I have ever read!!  Cheesy


Why is it I feel like I am the only person who doesnt have an alt account ... ?  Huh

Not me.  I dont have time for that nonsense. ...


Same. It's enough work to keep up on all the damn messages and threads with this one.
legendary
Activity: 3640
Merit: 1407
Why is it I feel like I am the only person who doesnt have an alt account ... ?  Huh

Not me.  I dont have time for that nonsense. ...
legendary
Activity: 1251
Merit: 1259
MONKEYNUTS
Why is it I feel like I am the only person who doesnt have an alt account ... ?  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
Thanks, smoothie, I hadn't noticed the BadBear reference and this is good to know about the signature.  I wish the admins were more active in outing scammers and their alt accounts.
The admins work hard to out alt accounts of persistant scammers. Take a look at BadBear's sent trust, he has over 65 sent trust ratings calling out alt accounts of scammers, so I'd argue that they do a fairly good job of keeping users aware of scammers alt accounts.
hero member
Activity: 679
Merit: 526
Where is the proof that WoodCollector is banned?
Take a look at his profile page. His signature mentions that the WoodCollector account was banned here.

Where is the proof that these are his alts?
It's fairly obvious that he was in control of a few alts, as those were really the only people standing up for him, plus IIRC BadBear tagged at least one of them as a WoodCollector alt.

Has there ever been an instance of a bitcointalk admin violating the privacy of their users?
It was fairly obvious that those users were alts of WoodCollector. Users figured that out pretty quickly, plus the staff here have tools to find alt accounts of users as well. Don't really think that making his alt accounts public was violating their privacy, when so many people knew already.
 
 
So banned accounts can still log in and update their signature?  Can we get confirmation on that forum behavior from an admin?

Short of evidence from BG4 or an admin, we are still left believing the word of WoodCollector, don't you see a problem with that?


When you are banned from this forum you are still allowed to update your signature.

The funny thing about WoodCollector is he pretty much responded how Goat (i.e. Chaang Noi) would if they were banned. lol

If you look at the trust page of each of the users listed in that wooden piece you will likely see BadBear (an admin) claim "A likely Alt of WoodCollector".

I presume they have their own methodology on how to determine if someone is using multiple accounts even behind tor.

The writing styles of those accounts are very similar as well. Take a look at their posts and you will see they continuously do not captitalize "i" and mistakenly use "your" in place of "you're".

Thanks, smoothie, I hadn't noticed the BadBear reference and this is good to know about the signature.  I wish the admins were more active in outing scammers and their alt accounts.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Where is the proof that WoodCollector is banned?
Take a look at his profile page. His signature mentions that the WoodCollector account was banned here.

Where is the proof that these are his alts?
It's fairly obvious that he was in control of a few alts, as those were really the only people standing up for him, plus IIRC BadBear tagged at least one of them as a WoodCollector alt.

Has there ever been an instance of a bitcointalk admin violating the privacy of their users?
It was fairly obvious that those users were alts of WoodCollector. Users figured that out pretty quickly, plus the staff here have tools to find alt accounts of users as well. Don't really think that making his alt accounts public was violating their privacy, when so many people knew already.
 
 
So banned accounts can still log in and update their signature?  Can we get confirmation on that forum behavior from an admin?

Short of evidence from BG4 or an admin, we are still left believing the word of WoodCollector, don't you see a problem with that?


When you are banned from this forum you are still allowed to update your signature.

The funny thing about WoodCollector is he pretty much responded how Goat (i.e. Chaang Noi) would if they were banned. lol

If you look at the trust page of each of the users listed in that wooden piece you will likely see BadBear (an admin) claim "A likely Alt of WoodCollector".

I presume they have their own methodology on how to determine if someone is using multiple accounts even behind tor.

The writing styles of those accounts are very similar as well. Take a look at their posts and you will see they continuously do not captitalize "i" and mistakenly use "your" in place of "you're".
hero member
Activity: 679
Merit: 526
Where is the proof that WoodCollector is banned?
Take a look at his profile page. His signature mentions that the WoodCollector account was banned here.

Where is the proof that these are his alts?
It's fairly obvious that he was in control of a few alts, as those were really the only people standing up for him, plus IIRC BadBear tagged at least one of them as a WoodCollector alt.

Has there ever been an instance of a bitcointalk admin violating the privacy of their users?
It was fairly obvious that those users were alts of WoodCollector. Users figured that out pretty quickly, plus the staff here have tools to find alt accounts of users as well. Don't really think that making his alt accounts public was violating their privacy, when so many people knew already.
 
 
So banned accounts can still log in and update their signature?  Can we get confirmation on that forum behavior from an admin?

Short of evidence from BG4 or an admin, we are still left believing the word of WoodCollector, don't you see a problem with that?
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
Where is the proof that WoodCollector is banned?
Take a look at his profile page. His signature mentions that the WoodCollector account was banned here.

Where is the proof that these are his alts?
It's fairly obvious that he was in control of a few alts, as those were really the only people standing up for him, plus IIRC BadBear tagged at least one of them as a WoodCollector alt.

Has there ever been an instance of a bitcointalk admin violating the privacy of their users?
It was fairly obvious that those users were alts of WoodCollector. Users figured that out pretty quickly, plus the staff here have tools to find alt accounts of users as well. Don't really think that making his alt accounts public was violating their privacy, when so many people knew already.
 
hero member
Activity: 679
Merit: 526
Where is the proof that WoodCollector is banned?
 
Where is the proof that these are his alts?
 
Has there ever been an instance of a bitcointalk admin violating the privacy of their users?
 
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Can't the admin see IP? I have seen more more in even less of a thread as a "staff" on a forum.
full member
Activity: 261
Merit: 103
I don't see Woodcollector's new posts.  Anyone got a link?
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Are all those his confirmed accounts?

Admin supposedly claimed those are likely alt accounts of woodcollector.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Are all those his confirmed accounts?
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1009
Lol, nice piece, was not expecting this from the Paper Safe creator Cheesy So I now see the guy returned and was quickly banned... what an odd story and what a unique character Grin

Hope you have no trouble selling that piece of bitcointalk history!
hero member
Activity: 679
Merit: 526
Give up Brucey, you're just making yourself look stupid.
BG4
legendary
Activity: 1006
Merit: 1024
PaperSafe
That leopard wood looks really nice when laser engraved.  Good luck with the sale!  Grin

I would say so too........

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1072
That leopard wood looks really nice when laser engraved.  Good luck with the sale!  Grin
BG4
legendary
Activity: 1006
Merit: 1024
PaperSafe
With a steady hand machine and some sharp tools burning light ... Fine details emerged out of ordinary block of wood..
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 502
#SuperBowl50 #NFCchamps
Funny.  What does the QR code link to?

I do find it fascinating that you're more likely to be immortalized with unique products around here by pulling scams than creating useful services.

The QR code is a link to his EXIT thread..  the one where he buried treasure.....
Did anyone ever find his buried treasure?

I doubt there was a treasure to begin with. It was a grasp for attention and to give reason to sell more products because of this phantom "treasure".
You mean that WC lied about the treasure? Who ever would have guessed that WC would be somehow dishonest after having his scam exposed /s
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Funny.  What does the QR code link to?

I do find it fascinating that you're more likely to be immortalized with unique products around here by pulling scams than creating useful services.

The QR code is a link to his EXIT thread..  the one where he buried treasure.....
Did anyone ever find his buried treasure?

I doubt there was a treasure to begin with. It was a grasp for attention and to give reason to sell more products because of this phantom "treasure".
Pages:
Jump to: