Pages:
Author

Topic: The Definition of a Low Quality Post (Read 2967 times)

legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1074
November 19, 2015, 04:38:50 AM
#50
This user is also a low quality

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hexcoin-201782

under yobit signature campaign: posts usually games and round plus local Sad

He already got red trust. If he will continue probably gonna get ban..

Local posts are not low quality only because they are local.

A local mod would have to be asked about his post quality before you can judge
full member
Activity: 136
Merit: 100
November 18, 2015, 10:33:42 PM
#49
This user is also a low quality

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hexcoin-201782

under yobit signature campaign: posts usually games and round plus local Sad

He already got red trust. If he will continue probably gonna get ban..
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
November 18, 2015, 10:12:00 PM
#48
-snip-
I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.

What is it you do again? I mean you have 408 posts in off topic currently.

Edit: ...and you repeat already given answers on threads that have already died down.

A hero member needs a long time before he can get that position or rank.
He needs 480 + activity.

I want to know in detail about potential account and how it gets mature with less effort?
When you start as a newbie, you are given the 14 activity if you posted.
Then after that, you will be given another 14 activity for every 2 weeks after if you posts during that time.

Which was exactly my point. I mean he asks why he is being judged, everyone is judged in this forum, it's not only you. I just said that you had an insane amount of posts without wearing a signature which is weird since most of your posts as shorena said are on off-topìc. Why are you even in a BITCOIN forum?
Because I find it more interesting thread on the off topic. Is it bad to always posting there? Then why should they did that section. Anyway, I also posted to the other section. Maybe you can't see it. Just nevermind if I don't wearing a signature, the important thing is I always make my job very well as I can. I am not also a spammer. Take note.

If you require an explanation, read post #31 in this thread, written by botany.  I think it sums up why you're being judged pretty damn well.  As for me, yes, a lot of my posts are crap but this is because I detest people, and bitcointalk has some of the silliest ones I've ever seen online.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
November 18, 2015, 08:12:16 PM
#47
This user is also a low quality

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hexcoin-201782

under yobit signature campaign: posts usually games and round plus local Sad
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
November 18, 2015, 06:18:21 PM
#46
-snip-
I am not also a spammer.

I disagree, reanswering an already answered question after several days is spam. Your (or the mods, doesnt matter much) removal of said posts speaks for itself.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
November 18, 2015, 05:47:32 PM
#45
-snip-
I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.

What is it you do again? I mean you have 408 posts in off topic currently.

Edit: ...and you repeat already given answers on threads that have already died down.

A hero member needs a long time before he can get that position or rank.
He needs 480 + activity.

I want to know in detail about potential account and how it gets mature with less effort?
When you start as a newbie, you are given the 14 activity if you posted.
Then after that, you will be given another 14 activity for every 2 weeks after if you posts during that time.

Which was exactly my point. I mean he asks why he is being judged, everyone is judged in this forum, it's not only you. I just said that you had an insane amount of posts without wearing a signature which is weird since most of your posts as shorena said are on off-topìc. Why are you even in a BITCOIN forum?
Because I find it more interesting thread on the off topic. Is it bad to always posting there? Then why should they did that section. Anyway, I also posted to the other section. Maybe you can't see it. Just nevermind if I don't wearing a signature, the important thing is I always make my job very well as I can. I am not also a spammer. Take note.
legendary
Activity: 1090
Merit: 1000
November 18, 2015, 02:40:48 PM
#44
I can give you a good definition of a low quality post.


"This is a low quality thread".
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 505
November 18, 2015, 11:35:01 AM
#43
-snip-
I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.

What is it you do again? I mean you have 408 posts in off topic currently.

Edit: ...and you repeat already given answers on threads that have already died down.

A hero member needs a long time before he can get that position or rank.
He needs 480 + activity.

I want to know in detail about potential account and how it gets mature with less effort?
When you start as a newbie, you are given the 14 activity if you posted.
Then after that, you will be given another 14 activity for every 2 weeks after if you posts during that time.

Which was exactly my point. I mean he asks why he is being judged, everyone is judged in this forum, it's not only you. I just said that you had an insane amount of posts without wearing a signature which is weird since most of your posts as shorena said are on off-topìc. Why are you even in a BITCOIN forum?
legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 5248
https://merel.mobi => buy facemasks with BTC/LTC
November 18, 2015, 08:06:20 AM
#42
So banning people who 'like to post' is wrong but banning people who like to post, plus are wearing signature at the same time is a justified act?
I sense a disturbance in the force here.

Certainly not...
Agreed, it's a slippery slope.

The thing i wanted to say is that everybody making nonsense spamposts should get a warning (be it banning or something else). It's just a lot easyer to consider someone to be maliciously spamming if he/she is clearly pushing his/her sig down other user's throat in order to drive up their postcount (and receive more money from their sigcampaign).
If somebody isn't wearing a sig, in my eye's it's less clear if he's actually trying to spam, or just having fun by posting a lot...

I hope that made sense  Grin

Btw: my sigcampaign doesn't pay me for posts in meta, so i hope this post doesn't get considered sigspam Wink
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
November 18, 2015, 07:03:45 AM
#41
-snip-
I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.

What is it you do again? I mean you have 408 posts in off topic currently.

Edit: ...and you repeat already given answers on threads that have already died down.

A hero member needs a long time before he can get that position or rank.
He needs 480 + activity.

I want to know in detail about potential account and how it gets mature with less effort?
When you start as a newbie, you are given the 14 activity if you posted.
Then after that, you will be given another 14 activity for every 2 weeks after if you posts during that time.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
November 18, 2015, 06:59:17 AM
#40
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

The definition of low quality posts is in your profile, 520 posts with 28 activity? Jesus Christ, you made 520 posts in 20 days, thats insane and you are not even wearing a signature, i cant believe it.
What's wrong with it? If there's a wrong about it then my apologies. I am only new here but I'm trying to fit myself in this kind of forum. The thing that I don't understand at all is why they are always judging me. They don't even know how to understand my situation.

The fact that you're not wearing a signature is actually a good thing IMO... If you made 520 posts in 20 days, but you were wearing a signature, people would jump to the conclusion that you were spamming a sig campaign...
In your case: in my opinion, you look like somebody who just likes to post... Which is OK for me Smiley
So banning people who 'like to post' is wrong but banning people who like to post, plus are wearing signature at the same time is a justified act?
I sense a disturbance in the force here.

I can't understand it very well. If there's no problem on posting then why there are people who are judging me because I am posting a lot?
I am not a spammer though. I am just working because I need to earn a lot for my studies.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1004
November 18, 2015, 06:15:07 AM
#39
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

The definition of low quality posts is in your profile, 520 posts with 28 activity? Jesus Christ, you made 520 posts in 20 days, thats insane and you are not even wearing a signature, i cant believe it.
What's wrong with it? If there's a wrong about it then my apologies. I am only new here but I'm trying to fit myself in this kind of forum. The thing that I don't understand at all is why they are always judging me. They don't even know how to understand my situation.

The fact that you're not wearing a signature is actually a good thing IMO... If you made 520 posts in 20 days, but you were wearing a signature, people would jump to the conclusion that you were spamming a sig campaign...
In your case: in my opinion, you look like somebody who just likes to post... Which is OK for me Smiley
So banning people who 'like to post' is wrong but banning people who like to post, plus are wearing signature at the same time is a justified act?
I sense a disturbance in the force here.
legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 5248
https://merel.mobi => buy facemasks with BTC/LTC
November 18, 2015, 05:56:16 AM
#38
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

The definition of low quality posts is in your profile, 520 posts with 28 activity? Jesus Christ, you made 520 posts in 20 days, thats insane and you are not even wearing a signature, i cant believe it.
What's wrong with it? If there's a wrong about it then my apologies. I am only new here but I'm trying to fit myself in this kind of forum. The thing that I don't understand at all is why they are always judging me. They don't even know how to understand my situation.

The fact that you're not wearing a signature is actually a good thing IMO... If you made 520 posts in 20 days, but you were wearing a signature, people would jump to the conclusion that you were spamming a sig campaign...
In your case: in my opinion, you look like somebody who just likes to post... Which is OK for me Smiley
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
November 18, 2015, 05:54:09 AM
#37
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

The definition of low quality posts is in your profile, 520 posts with 28 activity? Jesus Christ, you made 520 posts in 20 days, thats insane and you are not even wearing a signature, i cant believe it.
What's wrong with it? If there's a wrong about it then my apologies. I am only new here but I'm trying to fit myself in this kind of forum. The thing that I don't understand at all is why they are always judging me. They don't even know how to understand my situation.
hero member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 505
November 04, 2015, 05:54:50 AM
#36
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

The definition of low quality posts is in your profile, 520 posts with 28 activity? Jesus Christ, you made 520 posts in 20 days, thats insane and you are not even wearing a signature, i cant believe it.
newbie
Activity: 75
Merit: 0
October 31, 2015, 07:32:36 PM
#35
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.

I'm pretty new here, but why would people post off topic at all anyhow, is it for signature campaign's or whatever they are i keep reading about? Makes sense they get deleted though, good! Wink
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
October 31, 2015, 07:09:44 PM
#34
I think the definition of the low quality post is that they are posting but not related to the topic. That's why their posts are being deleted.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
October 31, 2015, 06:16:48 AM
#33
yeah so you alone are not considered as staff ? i never criticized you but i just pointed out a possibility.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here? What I originally said and meant was that each staff member is a different person. Each person has their own character. Some might not delete your low quality post, while some other might. This has nothing to do with personal views. Deleting something because of personal views, would be me deleting your post because I don't agree with it (obviously very wrong and nobody does this).
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
October 30, 2015, 11:07:25 PM
#32
Yeah that's pretty funny seeing as his entire post history is spam. No idea what he's up to.

I can say that the length of a post doesn't really matter but if the post doesn't add or help anything to the discussion then I consider it low quality or insubstantial post.

You should take your own advice here.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
October 30, 2015, 08:18:09 PM
#31
I can say that the length of a post doesn't really matter but if the post doesn't add or help anything to the discussion then I consider it low quality or insubstantial post.

@TTMSNewsMJ - It is very easy to find an insubstantial post.

For example, replies to the post "How old are you?"
I am 25
23 years old.

All this tells us is you turned 2 years younger in 11 days. Not very helpful, is it?  Tongue


Or, you can look at the posts in "Do you believe in ghosts" thread

Yes i do. They are real.
Yes I believe in ghost.
Yes I believe in ghost.

Multiple times for emphasis?  Tongue
Pages:
Jump to: