Pages:
Author

Topic: The Electric Universe theory (Read 1169 times)

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 506
March 09, 2017, 06:41:10 PM
#32
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
August 01, 2016, 08:37:39 PM
#31
Here is a string of videos from Youtube that shows the flaws in nuclear and gravitational theory in the stars and cosmos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_9n3cOL690&list=PL0851C89BD3B6ADBA&index=1

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 30, 2016, 05:03:22 PM
#30
To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws



What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.

^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

Cool

I bolded what is important to answer your post.
The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist.

If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness.

It just doesnt work.

Personally, I am not into this enough to answer your points. But the people in the videos seem to think that the material is there. Didn't they say that it exists in the form of nutrinos?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
July 30, 2016, 04:46:07 PM
#29
To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws



What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.

^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

Cool

I bolded what is important to answer your post.
The material that is needed for the refraction doesnt exist.

If we take our sun for example and do some calculations then the thickness of the lens has to be around 20.000 km and more of water or air. Or some other material with 700.000 km thickness.

It just doesnt work.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 30, 2016, 04:35:46 PM
#28
^^^ He should answer the question of course, but you have to show that there even is a gravitational lens, now that we have seen that it is simple aberration of light through particles near a star or other object.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
July 30, 2016, 04:23:21 PM
#27
To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws



What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g

Please point me to just one gravitational lens that was not achromatic.

The nobel prize with some million dollars are waiting.

Btw. You could also try to tell me what the size of the lens for refraction would be for example our sun.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 30, 2016, 03:54:57 PM
#26
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Cheesy

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway. Wink

I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong.

Besides, nobody knows that the Cern guys aren't creating the particles rather than simply finding them.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 506
July 30, 2016, 02:05:03 PM
#25
To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws



What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?

Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fePQdJNVF9g
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1009
JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK
July 30, 2016, 02:00:24 PM
#24
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Cheesy

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway. Wink

I'm not so sure about that, i think the Cern guys are crazy and reckless, they should setup their dangerous experiments on the Moon or Mars, not in the middle of Europe, where anything could go wrong.
sr. member
Activity: 256
Merit: 250
July 30, 2016, 01:54:46 PM
#23
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Cheesy

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!

lol I'm not the one doing this.
I think these guys know what they are doing anyway. Wink
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1009
JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK
July 30, 2016, 01:46:30 PM
#22
These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.

Please no black holes, I dont want the Earth to be sucked in Cheesy

Besides the evaporation of a microscopic black hole causes a blast that is stronger than 10,000 nukes, so no black holes please!
sr. member
Activity: 256
Merit: 250
July 30, 2016, 01:42:42 PM
#21
Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.

The do have videos of lab experiments conducted, they simulated a galaxy formation in a lab, seems kinda way out their but check it out.

Pretty hard to do that, you need a black hole in the middle that swirls the gas around it and creates the disk shape of the galaxy.

I'm sure you don't want to make a black hole on earth Cheesy

These experiments have the potential to generate microscopic black holes. They have very short lifespan and not enough to cause significant damage around.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 1009
JAYCE DESIGNS - http://bit.ly/1tmgIwK
July 30, 2016, 01:29:54 PM
#20
Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.

The do have videos of lab experiments conducted, they simulated a galaxy formation in a lab, seems kinda way out their but check it out.

Pretty hard to do that, you need a black hole in the middle that swirls the gas around it and creates the disk shape of the galaxy.

I'm sure you don't want to make a black hole on earth Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 506
July 30, 2016, 01:26:41 PM
#19
Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.

The do have videos of lab experiments conducted, they simulated a galaxy formation in a lab, seems kinda way out their but check it out.
sr. member
Activity: 256
Merit: 250
July 30, 2016, 01:24:12 PM
#18
Interesting, I'll see some of the documentaries.
sr. member
Activity: 254
Merit: 250
July 30, 2016, 12:21:28 PM
#17
I'm sorry ... But why this topic has been created? You say that you will not tolerate contradictory statements. But I can not be silent. If you do not have resulted articulate arguments in support of his theory. You can also say that the earth is flat. And the fact that the earth is flat, in one of the topics, some have argued, and even provide links to resources where there is evidence of their words. Personally, my opinion is that all these statements complete nonsense.

You must be one of the obstinate, standard cosmologists... one who is so greatly against finding anything new, that you won't even tolerate new ideas that might upset your dogmatic, "religious," scientific thinking.

Cool
I fully agree with Mr. Leprikon opinion. Personally, I am not an enemy of the new. I personally agree that science does not stand still. I find it interesting to learn about new discoveries in all fields of science and technology. But I understand, Mr. Leprikon, all the Offer should be made on the basis, not empty words. If not, then all the words of no more than science fiction. Sometimes it's more like a fairy tale.

This forum isn't really a place for proof. It is a place that we might express logic somewhat. The proof is in the examination of things that the experimenters did. Go and examine. There is a lot more logic to electric cosmos than to a nuclear one.

Cool
Perhaps, in this forum, not in the rules that everyone has to take responsibility for his words. And you can write nonsense. Then I say the earth is flat and revolves around the moon. Santa Claus flies reindeer each year, and through the chimneys, distributes gifts. Today, white is black and black is white. Do you believe me? Wink
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
July 30, 2016, 11:28:10 AM
#16
To all you mathematicians take 6 minutes to check out this video.

Elegant Math and Failed Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRFCNCMANws



What is the cause of the gravitational lense effect if there is no space time topology?
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
July 30, 2016, 10:42:55 AM
#15
Smoke DMT and be electricity.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 30, 2016, 10:22:09 AM
#14
I'm sorry ... But why this topic has been created? You say that you will not tolerate contradictory statements. But I can not be silent. If you do not have resulted articulate arguments in support of his theory. You can also say that the earth is flat. And the fact that the earth is flat, in one of the topics, some have argued, and even provide links to resources where there is evidence of their words. Personally, my opinion is that all these statements complete nonsense.

You must be one of the obstinate, standard cosmologists... one who is so greatly against finding anything new, that you won't even tolerate new ideas that might upset your dogmatic, "religious," scientific thinking.

Cool
I fully agree with Mr. Leprikon opinion. Personally, I am not an enemy of the new. I personally agree that science does not stand still. I find it interesting to learn about new discoveries in all fields of science and technology. But I understand, Mr. Leprikon, all the Offer should be made on the basis, not empty words. If not, then all the words of no more than science fiction. Sometimes it's more like a fairy tale.

This forum isn't really a place for proof. It is a place that we might express logic somewhat. The proof is in the examination of things that the experimenters did. Go and examine. There is a lot more logic to electric cosmos than to a nuclear one.

Cool
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
July 30, 2016, 10:14:41 AM
#13
Earth is a a reflection of electric lady land.  From spirit we come and to spirit we go.

Beyond body is a sea of soul.
Pages:
Jump to: