Pages:
Author

Topic: The emoticons of Bitcoins - Satoshi Codes! - page 2. (Read 4500 times)

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1002
August 18, 2011, 09:28:47 AM
#5
I think it's a bad idea, but you're welcome to make your own fork incorporating this and prove me wrong.

Incorporating what?

He's just giving the idea for people to interpret the last 2 digits as those meanings, no need for a new fork at all.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 502
August 18, 2011, 09:25:35 AM
#4
You have my vote for the "best cute+funny bitcoin idea of the month".
member
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
August 18, 2011, 09:24:10 AM
#3
I think it's a bad idea, but you're welcome to make your own fork incorporating this and prove me wrong.


woosh
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
August 18, 2011, 09:18:57 AM
#2
I think it's a bad idea, but you're welcome to make your own fork incorporating this and prove me wrong.
legendary
Activity: 1147
Merit: 1001
August 18, 2011, 09:16:08 AM
#1
One thing to make Bitcoin more sociable would be to add a message to a Bitcoin transfer. Since this is not part of the protocol, one could have a standard to interpret the last digits sent in a Bitcoin amount, the Satoshis. The digits are currently hardly ever being used and it costs nothing for the computer to use these. People want to express emotions in the messages on computers, that's where the use of emoticons came from (namely as just simply an interpretation of certain rarely used key combinations).

Therefore I present hereby, Satoshi Codes, the "emoticons" of Bitcoin. You simply add these Satoshis to an amount you are transferring with the following meanings (since Satoshis are currently worth very little it also costs almost nothing):

Satoshi Codes (last 2 digits of Bitcoin amount sent):

00 - (no message)
01 - thank you
02 - to our valued customer/recipient
03 - Please check your mail.
04 - enjoy!/have a nice day
05 - I'm sorry!/Sorry for the delay
06 - Happy Birthday!
07 - For a good friend/friends forever!
08 - hugs & kisses
09 - with Love

 Grin Grin Grin

What do you think of this?
Pages:
Jump to: