Pages:
Author

Topic: The failure of Ethereum is complete - it is now a mere permissioned spreadsheet. - page 2. (Read 4059 times)

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Ethereum Crypto is a COMPLETE SCAM.

People who dont realise this are either:

1. SCAMMERS
2. FUCKING IDIOTS

No other possibility! Even if it made you some money, its all a BIG FAT SCAM and wont succeed. It will come down hard.

FTFY. Care to tell me why your shitcoin of choice is different?

What blind ? stupid or what ?

Care to explain to us all how you managed to attempt to play dumb
..while skipping over the explanation provided 100x before & after that comment you quoted ?

Play smart ?

Work harder at it.. you FAIL !
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1068
Juicin' crypto
There are A FEW good coins but yes for the most part, most crypto is bullshit (mainly in alts biz).

ETH is a joke.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Ethereum Crypto is a COMPLETE SCAM.

People who dont realise this are either:

1. SCAMMERS
2. FUCKING IDIOTS

No other possibility! Even if it made you some money, its all a BIG FAT SCAM and wont succeed. It will come down hard.

FTFY. Care to tell me why your shitcoin of choice is different?
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
Sad diversion Minecache.. ETHTard Fail Retort #323

"MY" Bitcoin ?

I don't care about Bitcoin. (i have NONE i gave them away as a donation)
I also have criticized BTC the last 3 years combined more than any other Altcoin including Ethereum.

Minecache ..zip it up, your desperation is showing  Shocked

I also find it funny that i already pointed out in the past you and your other handful of shill noob accounts
all act the same way.. same formulaic response every time.
Attempted personal attacks / Trolling etc
Am i impressed ?
..yes !
You have once again demonstrated masterful use of the Forum Quote button  Cheesy

PS:
The fact Bitcoin is good or bad has no bearing on ETH being a scam.
Bitcoin being bad does not make Ethereum good smart guy ROFL
Even if Bitcoin is bad ? Ethereum is a 1,000x worse sweet-heart.

Need any more pwnage investard hit me up i got more if you need it.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
@OP
Well said, i have been saying pretty much the same thing.. we agree 100% i think.

The rational can't be explained to the iratational.
Look at 2ndcunt ..he resorted pretty fast to criticizing your name and grammar.
He got what you meant to say but chose instead to home in the potential grammar error.
This won't cut the mustard sweety LOL

What was the last ETH rumor(s) i heard ?

- "Big Banks" were going to buy SHITLOADS of Ethereum and start using it !

- The Ukraine govt. was going to start using it for elections.


hmmmm ?

I suppose they may be re-thinking buying the for-profit-scheme-token
..to use as an alternative means (anything not profit)
Ethereum is used 90% for nothing but trading on centralized exchanges for profit.
It was never intended to be a currency by design to replace Bitcoin (which is the point to all this)
It was never released fairly.
It was manipulated since day 1 by the rich & powerful to drain the BTC from the poor.
It succeeded in doing this and V. Butterin even admitted to dumping a fortune on you all.

It really is a scam and your a deceitful Shilltard if you can't see it.

It is dead because this is the truth and it will only become more apparent in time.
And where did Butterin get all those coins to dump too ?

And who is the rich that is bank rolling this "Scheme Coin" since launch in 2014 ?

There is nothing decentralized about any of this ETH / DAO crap ..even if that is what the 'D' stands for  Roll Eyes

It's a Pyramid-Scheme scam launched by fraudsters and scheming profiteers.
It was DOA on launch and it doesn't matter to the dev's because they know they can push it still anyway.
If Mt. GOX opened it's doors and added Paycoin you all would dive on it
..*if* you thought it would make you money.

So.. all the ETH team has to do is keep organizing spam / hype campaigns then Pump it !
..then dump on it again.
And it each time the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and you all enable them to do it.
..so you too can profit from the "scheme".

Lessons learned ? 0 nada zilch a big fat ZERO
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Dead shit

Buy WBB and hold/enjoy as dev releases massive real-world items to the masses Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1067
I just see etherium devs, bran Armstrong, Andreas, exchanges, ledger and a whole host of others all slithering around together greased from head to toe not in ether but ethers big pot of viscous dev dollars - not a pretty sight.

Yes CryptoCurrency whispers but money still talks.

Most around here don't know their arse from their elbow and would trade decentralised currency for sainsburys shopping trolly tokens If it might make 'em a few quid.
hero member
Activity: 717
Merit: 501
Ethereum is a COMPLETE SCAM.

People who dont realise this are either:

1. SCAMMERS
2. FUCKING IDIOTS

No other possibility! Even if it made you some money, its all a BIG FAT SCAM and wont succeed. It will come down hard.

hero member
Activity: 912
Merit: 1021
If you don’t believe, why are you here?
Wow. That MP dude is a psychopath.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
My instinct is to agree that Ethereum has disappointed especially in its handling of the DAO crisis and the resultant forking discussion. That said, i am gonna reserve judgment for a little longer and see what happens
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
[...]
A magical flying horse from a different fandom?
With deep, well-reasoned musings re. the nature of cryptoocurrencies and expert financial advice?!
                                                                                                          
>No ICO token can become a true standard for world value
Why?
As opposed to what?
WTF does that even mean? What is the current "standard for world value"?

I understand that I shouldn't judge a magical talking horse by how much sense it makes, the mere fact that it talks and posts on the web is amazing, but still...
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
Every coin creates insiders and outsiders the minute it is born. Every coin will also tend to skewed distribution as some people have more money/power/material to invest, or are at the right place at the right time. If I can buy more CPUs/GPUs/ASICs than you, or my elecricity is cheaper, I will have more coins. If I am more interested in the technology than person B, I will buy more coins/educate myself better at the start en when the technology becomes popular I will have a headstart. Also nothing wrong with wanting to be an early adopter for financial gains, you take more risk to hopefully get a bigger reward.
So the ICO point is kind of moot imo.

At least then those computers will do work to generate tokens, showing that effort was expended to create them.  You can then choose to dump them on the open free market or keep them.  But you had to do the same work everyone else did. 
 
An ICO opens up all kinds of potential exploits for devs, like buying their own tokens to control the supply and inflate market cap.... on top of not allowing a project to grow organically.  As I have always said, if your project is truly world changing then you won't need an ICO - just being around as an early adopter will be enough to make your time investment worthwhile.  But if you plan to cash out at a later point, an ICO makes far more sense.
  "if your project is truly world changing then you won't need an ICO - just being around as an early adopter will be enough to make your time investment worthwhile" Truer words never spoken on this site +1
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
Keep in mind that this is the same attacker who attacked Mt.Gox. He doesn't waste his time trying to convince you. He just does it.

His attack is ongoing and (assuming he succeeds) you won't realize he has won until it is too late for you to sell ETH.

...

His [the "attacker's"] opinion on whether Ethereum will survive his "attack":

Quote from: TheCon
The whole of ETH and DAO was a con to start with. Bunch of rich btc invectors wanted a new play toy. Don't worry folks the price will shoot back up because no one cares if there is security risks or a Ponzi that will never be used by ordinary citizens

DAO is a casino that just got robbed buy like all casinos they never fall because of human greed.

That [bolded] part is right.

You'd probably want to read the entire post quoted above, by clicking it to go to the thread whence it came.

Btw, your beloved Monero is next.
hero member
Activity: 718
Merit: 545
The soft fork code is already in the latest GETH..
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Has a new wallet with the forking code been released, and is there a page showing the total number of ETH miners using the new wallet?
hero member
Activity: 718
Merit: 545
IF their actions only affected Ethereum, I wouldn't mind.. Let them play.

But I think this will change people's fundamental perception of all crypto.

And not in a good way..  Cry

A small, mini-chain with a handful of users, sure.. pork-fork away.

But if the 2nd largest 'decentralised' chain can pull this shit off, it's on the table now for any and all coins to come.

..

And the truth is, it is now, and always was. We just didn't realise how close to the edge we were.

( I am a little shocked at how quickly/easily the ETH miners are accepting this though.. That I did not expect. Too much faith in Humanity. Fool that I am.. )
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 504
Every coin creates insiders and outsiders the minute it is born. Every coin will also tend to skewed distribution as some people have more money/power/material to invest, or are at the right place at the right time. If I can buy more CPUs/GPUs/ASICs than you, or my elecricity is cheaper, I will have more coins. If I am more interested in the technology than person B, I will buy more coins/educate myself better at the start en when the technology becomes popular I will have a headstart. Also nothing wrong with wanting to be an early adopter for financial gains, you take more risk to hopefully get a bigger reward.
So the ICO point is kind of moot imo.

At least then those computers will do work to generate tokens, showing that effort was expended to create them.  You can then choose to dump them on the open free market or keep them.  But you had to do the same work everyone else did. 
 
An ICO opens up all kinds of potential exploits for devs, like buying their own tokens to control the supply and inflate market cap.... on top of not allowing a project to grow organically.  As I have always said, if your project is truly world changing then you won't need an ICO - just being around as an early adopter will be enough to make your time investment worthwhile.  But if you plan to cash out at a later point, an ICO makes far more sense.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Every coin creates insiders and outsiders the minute it is born. Every coin will also tend to skewed distribution as some people have more money/power/material to invest, or are at the right place at the right time. If I can buy more CPUs/GPUs/ASICs than you, or my elecricity is cheaper, I will have more coins. If I am more interested in the technology than person B, I will buy more coins/educate myself better at the start en when the technology becomes popular I will have a headstart. Also nothing wrong with wanting to be an early adopter for financial gains, you take more risk to hopefully get a bigger reward.
So the ICO point is kind of moot imo.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 504
I have held my tongue for too long on this matter, and cannot stand idly by and watch as Ethereum continues to suck money into its scheme.  The failures of Ethereum are almost too numerous to mention but the recent proposal to hardfork to re-write history completes the trilogy.  
  
The dream of cryptocurrency, blockchains, and Bitcoin was a decentralized mathematical object that obeyed the rules of game theory and computer science.  No central authority was necessary because central authorities by definition cannot be trusted with absolute power.  There is not a man or woman alive immune from the corrupting influence of absolute wealth and power, and the wise people behind the best crypto projects in existence know and understand this.  
  
Ethereum was DOA, but its failure is now complete.  The three pillars of Ethereum's failure are thus:  
  
1. ICO token:  
  
No ICO token can become a true standard for world value because it immediately creates a community of insiders and outsiders.  It generates an immediate legal and regulatory nightmare.  And it reduces something that should be a world changing vision into profit-making venture.  There can be no purity of intent with an ICO because the intent was clear from the very beginning - get paid.  
  
2. Arbitrary PoW/PoS Switch controlled by devs:  
  
The faults of proof of stake are numerous, but we will ignore them in this context.  A project that launches with a predefined PoW time period before switching to PoS might still inherit severe problems down the road if it grows large enough, but at least the accusations against it are limited to the technical and mathematical.  However with Ethereum there are no predefined periods - the devs reserve the right to radically alter the consensus mechanism at any time.  This is akin to agreeing to play a board game where the owner of the game can just change the rules whenever it suits them: "Oh, ummm.... so I landed on Boardwalk, and I'm making a new rule that you can buy all the colors of a property at once if you want and if they are unowned."  The fact that the community has accepted this until now is absurd on its own - and now we finally have the third pillar that completes the madness (which also happens to be a crime of centralization).  
  
3. Arbitrary hardforks to protect profits:  
  
The third is the last and worst.  A hardfork to avert an obvious game breaking bug is understandable, as happened with Bitcoin's generation bug back in the early days.  But when a contract behaves as intended, and the owners get pwned, you don't get to just roll things back because you didn't like the outcome of the rules you created.  Seriously, this is the crypto equivalent of the bail outs, which was the entire point of decentralizing the money supply to begin with.  At this point the Ethereum scheme has wrapped around and began to eat its own tail.  
  

 
  
The time has come to recognize the Ethereum failure for what it is - a billion dollar spreadsheet.  Vitalik, insider devs, if you are reading this you have my respect: you are more talented coders than I, and I suspect you got some very big players to buy your spreadsheet tokens.  Good, crypto was always about a transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor.  So end it then, and make your victory complete.  Dump on the bankers and whales who were foolish enough to agree to a game where you can change the rules at any time.  Take your profits and talent and come work and develop for a blockchain that actually has hard rules and firm cryptography - its never to early to start envisioning the second layers of proof-of-work blockchains where DAPPS may actually have a future.  
  
Reading this you might think I have an agenda, or an active short.  I don't.  I hold no position in Ethereum or DAO nor do I intend to establish one.  But I know truth and strength when I see it, and we both know what Ethereum has become - the very demon it set out to conquer.  Take that shiny diamond, turn it around on yourself, and do what you know must be done.  
  
Pages:
Jump to: