Pages:
Author

Topic: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 250 BTC. - page 3. (Read 70756 times)

legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
May 18, 2011, 02:58:32 PM
#77
...you did NOT do these calculations yourself before starting to mine?! Shocked
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
May 18, 2011, 02:51:50 PM
#76
the profit margin of bitcoin mining did not going up as much as the exchange rate has, so yes, this needs a price adjustment
If you look at the profit per 100MH/s, the price would rather go up than down... Roll Eyes
http://bitcoin.atspace.com/income.html

Awesome site, I'm apparently making a lot more than I initially thought, and the yield is majorly more stable than I first thought...
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
May 18, 2011, 02:36:21 AM
#75
the profit margin of bitcoin mining did not going up as much as the exchange rate has, so yes, this needs a price adjustment
If you look at the profit per 100MH/s, the price would rather go up than down... Roll Eyes
http://bitcoin.atspace.com/income.html
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 17, 2011, 09:19:56 PM
#74
the profit margin of bitcoin mining did not going up as much as the exchange rate has, so yes, this needs a price adjustment
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 17, 2011, 09:16:28 PM
#73
BTW, Syke, I couldn't reproduce your numbers with Phoenix. I obtained 664 Mhash/s, which is slightly lower than reeses.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 17, 2011, 09:14:50 PM
#72
Exactly Smiley

More seriously, regardless of the BTC/USD exchange rate, my miner still produces 6.3% more Bitcoins than the 2nd fastest miner, so it makes sense for my price to be relative to the Bitcoin instead of the Dollar.

(Feels weird to say "the Bitcoin").
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
May 17, 2011, 06:12:12 AM
#71
The price is exactly the same as always, only the dollar fell against the bitcoin recently... Wink
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 16, 2011, 05:37:16 PM
#70
the price is now OVER 2500$++ for this? I find that ridiculous. needs another price adjustment
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
May 16, 2011, 04:55:58 PM
#69
I have 3 ATI 5970's  with standard clock.  It is doing 1704 Mhashes/second
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
May 06, 2011, 11:10:27 AM
#68
681 with stock everything. 830 MH/s, etc.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 06, 2011, 06:45:45 AM
#67
Is this 681 Mhash/s with or without memory downclocking?
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
May 05, 2011, 04:03:05 AM
#66
I didn't have the optimal Phoenix settings before. And I was rounding down. Here's an actual shot:

681.06


mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 05, 2011, 03:45:59 AM
#65
No problem.  Stock voltage, gpu, memory clock settings.

Thank you. Post updated.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 05, 2011, 03:38:28 AM
#64
I optimized my Phoenix settings for my 6990 and installed the new 11.4 driver. At stock card settings I now get 680 MH/s, which compares very favorably with your 683 MH/s using 11.3. I have yet to try the downgrade to 11.1 trick.

Is 680 Mhash/s rounded up by a few Mhash/s?

Are you saying that you, just now, improved your performance from 668 Mhash/s (as you claimed in your previous posts: "670 Mhash/s" minus the "2 Mhash/s from memory downclocking") up to 680 Mhash/s, this time without memory downclocking?
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
May 05, 2011, 02:37:36 AM
#63
I optimized my Phoenix settings for my 6990 and installed the new 11.4 driver. At stock card settings I now get 680 MH/s, which compares very favorably with your 683 MH/s using 11.3. I have yet to try the downgrade to 11.1 trick.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 05, 2011, 01:22:51 AM
#62
I would be interested in a 5970 optimized miner, and I know there is such a thing  Cool.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 04, 2011, 09:44:27 PM
#61
Thanks reeses for these very precise numbers, and quality of the report. (Compared to Syke, I don't know if he was rounding up to 670 Mhash/s, and he doesn't seem 100% sure of the "2 Mhash/s" impact of memory downclocking).

I assume your numbers are without memory clock or voltage changes, right? If yes, I will update my claim to 708/666 = 6.3% faster than Phoenix as I want to convey exact numbers.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
May 03, 2011, 10:43:20 PM
#60
I am certaintly interested in the feedback that you guys give me about pricing, thanks. Predicting the demand curve for a given price is certainly not trivial. As nster said, pricing it too low may cause it to be leaked and pirated. I am not going to divulge how many buyers have purchased hdminer so far, but I do think that 350 BTC is a right balance at this moment.

Syke: it is the first time I hear 670 Mhahs/s at 830 MHz. Did you modify other hw settings such as memory clock, memory voltage, gpu voltage?


I do however think that the price adjustment was not enough... going from 320$ to over 1000$ is silly

I reasonable price would be anything between 100 and 200 BTC. I could see it working better at 150 BTC
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
May 03, 2011, 09:30:30 PM
#59
I think I got 2 extra MH/s from downclocking the memory. Everything else is stock.
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
May 03, 2011, 09:16:40 PM
#58
I am certaintly interested in the feedback that you guys give me about pricing, thanks. Predicting the demand curve for a given price is certainly not trivial. As nster said, pricing it too low may cause it to be leaked and pirated. I am not going to divulge how many buyers have purchased hdminer so far, but I do think that 350 BTC is a right balance at this moment.

Syke: it is the first time I hear 670 Mhahs/s at 830 MHz. Did you modify other hw settings such as memory clock, memory voltage, gpu voltage?
Pages:
Jump to: