You probably haven't been around long enough to notice, but Kano, NotFuzzyWarm, HaggsFin and Philipma1957 are among the most helpful, knowledgeable and trustworthy people in this forum and collectively represent a substantial knowledge of mining - software, hardware and mine operations.
Might be worth paying attention to what they say.
I am a small-scale mining manufacturer myself; I don't design chips, but I do everything beyond that: circuit and board design, firmware programming, PCB population and testing, even metalwork for heatsinks and housings and I have a driver programmer on retainer. And they are the guys I ask for advice and opinions.
It doesn't matter whether we believe you spent two years working on an ASIC design or not. What they're all saying is, nobody here will buy into the promise of a miner so far in the future, especially one without working samples or even a known working chip. They say your offering looks like a scam because it does, because similar claims with similar bodies of evidence have been presented here a hundred times before and almost to a one they were all lies. You might be the exception, but there is no way (at this time) to prove it definitively enough for miners to buy in. Even if there was, miners tend to be a short-term-gains lot (as in bitcoin mining, the variables are so many and so unpredictable that the landscape six months from now is impossible to rely on) and won't bank on the kind of hardware available in a few months let alone the end of next year.
If your project is real and comes to fruition, that'll be very exciting. But you're asking for trust from skeptics, whose skepticism is built on the reality of having watched scams come and go on a near-weekly basis for most of the last decade. Talking to a miner manufacturer or someone else with the technical competence to verify your work thus far, the capital to continue it, and both the willingness and ability to absorb the loss should it fail will do you better.
And feel free to come back and rub our noses in it when you do have demonstration hardware. We'll all be excited to see the thing work. We love hardware, and everyone enjoys a good underdog success story, so keep us posted on your progress. But please don't underestimate us, the well-established members of a technical community, and please don't be offended by our initial low estimation of you, who comes in with no reputation or credentials to make some pretty tall claims. Trust must be earned, especially from people who have been burned before.
Thank you for your polite comment. I am sorry for your losses from scammers, but to be honest, it is surprising to me that such smart people are not able to discern fraud right away. We have been following cryptocurrency for many years. One glance is enough for us to understand that such projects as BitConnect, Envion and many others are frauds. We could see it immediately when they started. And it was very surprising to us that many cryptocurrency experts promoted these projects and invested their money in them. But unfortunately, people never listen to warnings. Especially those who think they are great experts. Therefore, we could only observe all this.
As for our project, in this case, everything is simple. ANY expert in the field of microelectronics can simply take our code and test it in the appropriate programs. This testing will immediately show the real performance.
If you say that real grand-masters of mining are involved in trolling in this thread, then why have NONE ONE of them tested our code yet? After all, we gave it open. We offered to check it out. But no one did anything. All the genius of the great engineers of Bitcointalk in this thread is on the level of "fishy shits". This suggests that they are not good enough specialists, and also that they have a bad temper and poorly educated.
Thus, I no longer want to explain and prove anything to anyone. Anyone who does not like our topic, please leave this topic. Anyone who wants to stay should CHECK the CODE we posted. Only after that I am ready to consider the objective criticism that will be brought to the level of my work. Criticism should contain specific references to the mistakes made. Any other NOT OBJECTIVE ratings will be ignored.
If the great masters of this forum are filled with envy and filth, then you can successfully exchange this filth here with each other.
In conclusion, let me ancient wisdom:
"There are two types of creatures - those that are like bees, and those that are like flies. Bees collect nectar, bring it to the hive and make it honey. Flies chew on other people's feces and carry them around the world."
Back in 2013 this forum sent thousands of dollars to a bunch of Russian asic builders.
They built good machines that worked well. But when they were supposed to ship them to us they said mother Russia won’t let us ship them. So here is a btc refund.
So they got to build about 10% of the btc network on our money and keep the gear.
It is not as if they said we will give you extra for the loan you gave us.
So why on earth would anyone want to send 3 or 4 thousand to a random name on the internet.
That can do the same thing that was done by Russian builders back in 2013.
I know only one Russian project of miners. This is a Bitfury. If they tricked you and stole your money - why didn't you sue them? Why no one knows about this? I hear about such statements for the first time.
Centralized scam EOS collected billions of dollars. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if this guy could collect a few million easily.
For 2 years of the project we used all our money and some investors money. In total, we have collected $ 4800 from other investors. And that's all. So what kind of millions are you talking about? Do you not see that we are condemned here only for the fact that we have offered the industry a way out. We have proposed a technology that even in the current situation, when bitcoin is very cheap, and the network is very powerful, can give a good profit. And here we are declared scammers, not even having studied our development. What millions are we talking about?