TBH if it has nothing to do with play to earn gaming. As far as i know if allowing to transfer NFT between games and console is not something special. It's pretty much the same as when you are having asset ethereum and then this asset can be used in different blockchain as well. I never heard that if there was play to earn game that implemented it and mostly kept trying to be safe by staying on their own platform. It may be related to the buy and sell NFT pretty much the same like give you the ability to sell your NFT to others who played another game or different console.
I see nothing special in this news. It was not even giving a good impact on the all of play to earn token in the market.
It sounds like the news didn't even relate to the play to earn game. Since sony already supported by bunch of popular game developers and that's quite easy to implement it.
Topic: The future is looking good for P2e games (Read 200 times)
Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?
I think every time the devs have to see the shortcomings and make new things, if you really care about the earn you get and the game play is not interesting then the players will move on to an interesting game.
As time shows, such games do not last long. At first, there is a hype around the project, and then it all calms down and interest in the project disappears. A new game comes out and everything repeats again. So I'm not very enthusiastic about it.
I am so bullish on play-to-earn games, if done right, many gamers around the world might end up coming into blockchain gaming, the best project on my mind is ALU and GALA, since platforms like these don't rely on a single game they will be successful, they provide access to tons of games and game developers can also use their platforms to build new games, this is cool. Also not too long ago ALU just partnered with Delysium, a shooter play to earn game with AAA gamingraphicsic-like.
It may be true that the popularity of such play-to-earn games may increase in the future. But these things are excluded in all the good games I've seen these days. Many believe that NFTs may just be a hype. However, many big gaming companies are coming to join this sector which is actually a plus point. But I think it is still too late for the prevalence of play to earn to increase.
At the currently moment I don't see any evidences that could lead me to believe the future is looking good for P2E games industry. Of course in the future this niche of crypto market can shine, but it seems there isn't anything revolutionary being developed right now on this sense.
It may be due to the bearish market or it can be due to a lack of interest from big studios and alternative developers, since they can already profit a lot of money from in-game sales exclusively, so they see no reason to launch P2P games and the few who do, don't put a lot of effort on the games' projects to keep them sustainable on long term.
It may be due to the bearish market or it can be due to a lack of interest from big studios and alternative developers, since they can already profit a lot of money from in-game sales exclusively, so they see no reason to launch P2P games and the few who do, don't put a lot of effort on the games' projects to keep them sustainable on long term.
Console gaming companies may be aware of the rise of play-to-earn games and NFTs, but it's important to note that console gaming offers a different experience than these newer gaming models. While play-to-earn games offer real-world rewards, console gaming focuses on high-quality graphics, immersive gameplay, and often a strong emphasis on storytelling. It remains to be seen whether play-to-earn games and NFTs will become a dominant force in the gaming industry, and it's unlikely that console gaming companies will abandon their traditional business models. Ultimately, gamers will decide which type of gaming experience they prefer, and there may be room for both console gaming and play-to-earn games/NFTs in the future.
Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.
In this image above, it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
In this image above, it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
Time is changing everything. We can not control it. The only thing we can do is change based on the environment. We used pay-to-play game mode in the past. It does not have any benefits for gamers. But If you are playing play to earn games, there will be some rewards for the gamers. So they can use it.
The future of p2e has already been discussed here many times and my opinion is the constant. As long as people will come to such business models solely to make money, the vitality of such projects will be negligible and they will constantly experience problems with inflation or liquidity. People don't want to support the internal economy, they don't want to participate in the development of gaming communities, they want to come and snatch a piece of liquidity and that's it. What kind of p2e development can we talk about with that kind of attitude people have towards these projects? P2E needs to be radically redesigned, do vesting, do linear unlocking of tokens, retain part of the earnings in favor of the project treasury, then these projects will at least somehow live and develop.
The field of P2E in the market has not really exploded yet it is just that in the previous period we saw the hype of many projects so it is rare to find a product that really delivers lasting value.
I have also seen some products that attract a lot of people and they also have very good finished product quality, but for its size and true value I don't believe the numbers are telling, because it is heavily pressured by finance.
However, this is still a very potential area of the future and I think that if I seriously develop it, the fact that this field explodes in this space is not too surprising to me.
I have also seen some products that attract a lot of people and they also have very good finished product quality, but for its size and true value I don't believe the numbers are telling, because it is heavily pressured by finance.
However, this is still a very potential area of the future and I think that if I seriously develop it, the fact that this field explodes in this space is not too surprising to me.
I'm gonna be waiting the resurrection of these P2e games, the main reason they fail so hard and just vanish is because most of the game are shit anyways. the quality isn't there and many realizes then just outright leave the P2e games be and instead switch over to more beneficial trends. if some developer could brings out good game, eventually it will revive, but that is a big if honestly.
For sure the same hype last time when P2E started to pop and gained a lot of attention and a lot of volumes will not happen again. It's like hype. I'm not a hater here but I believe there will be some new trend again in the future besides P2E, maybe P2E will still exist but it will not become the same just like before, it will not be the same hype or trend just like before. 
it'd be great if there's game that's true AAA like a really good games but it seems majority games are either pixelated game or it is just the sims copycats which is kinda ridiculous considering the potential wasted on these games. if the devs could ever truly putting an effort into their game it'd be great but alas that seems like quite impossible with the current p2e concept.
Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.
In this image above, it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
In this image above, it is revealed that SONY has filled a patient for NFTs to allow transfers between games and consoles.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
I just have a question for you op, are you a gamer? have you tried playing the play2earn game? What games is this if ever yes?
I was just curious to play p2e at a time when it was cautious in the crypto industry and one of the things I tried was the various crypto games that I somehow managed to earn just right and not a lot of money.
But now it's not popular anymore, it's only in favor of gamers, because it's not like you can just play every day and spend time on it, especially if you're a family person. I can't see if it really has a future. Because most of the time what is really happening is just hyped.
There are no good p2e games on the market right now but i'm sure it's just because it's a new thing and people don't really found it's perfect form yet. Console gaming companies may be exploring ways to incorporate blockchain and NFTs into their offerings, it remains to be seen whether play-to-earn games will become a major focus of the gaming industry in the years to come.
There still Axie Infinity that I believe, a lot of players are still playing.
But they say, it is getting expensive and the earning is not the same anymore.
There are other platforms like CryptoKitties, The Sandbox and others, which means, they are still surviving.
Chainplay has long list of these P2E games, you can also check their corresponding markets - https://chainplay.gg/, most of the top p2e game are still under ETH network.
I'm gonna be waiting the resurrection of these P2e games, the main reason they fail so hard and just vanish is because most of the game are shit anyways. the quality isn't there and many realizes then just outright leave the P2e games be and instead switch over to more beneficial trends. if some developer could brings out good game, eventually it will revive, but that is a big if honestly.
There are no good p2e games on the market right now but i'm sure it's just because it's a new thing and people don't really found it's perfect form yet. Console gaming companies may be exploring ways to incorporate blockchain and NFTs into their offerings, it remains to be seen whether play-to-earn games will become a major focus of the gaming industry in the years to come.
Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?
You are right, many play to earn games do lack quality, but that's because it's a blockchain game where both qualified game developers and non qualified game developers are free to build, if it was Sony at work here they won't hire less experienced builders, they always go after the best, but things will turn around very soon. Now I have no reason to believe that console gaming companies will let NFT and play to earn game pass by while they look and do nothing, I am sure that they are worried that play ri earn game could be the main focusing of gamers in the future, if new p2e games start offering gamers what they are been offered by console gaming companies it is over.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
This is getting more interesting for play-to-earn games, it seems companies like SONY aren't ready to lose their gamers to blockchain gaming, if you believe that play to earn games aren't going to work out you are playing, and keep playing till things get serious.
I am a passionate pc gamer for many years now and as a gamer i am still not really sure what to think about NFT's and play 2 earn mechanics in a game. I have not seen a good game so far, that also had NFT's and a play 2 earn concept included and to be honest i think it is also very hard to create a game, that is fun to play for people that do not want to invest into it and that is also profitable for those "players" that are playing this game to earn money.
In order to be profitable to play i think that 90% of the playersbase need to paying those 10% of the players that are earning money and therefore the game needs to be fun to play or those 90% won't stay.
Yes, compare to pc games, P2E are way off, quality is not that good, mechanics. But let's see, if big names in the gaming industry will focus to at least developed their won P2E with the whole metaverse concept then who knows.
But for now, there's none, even Facebook who has been building a metaverse can't do it, how can the others do with just small budget.
So I don't see it being as big in the gaming industry, it will still be based on how much money players and the developers are going to earn, simply as that.
Most play-to-earn games lack balance, prioritizing earning rewards over gameplay quality, balance, or fairness. For an existing project, will this balance be provided for players more interested in playing than earning rewards?
You are right, many play to earn games do lack quality, but that's because it's a blockchain game where both qualified game developers and non qualified game developers are free to build, if it was Sony at work here they won't hire less experienced builders, they always go after the best, but things will turn around very soon. If only there are exciting games that can work on cheap smartphones, I would probably be playing often off those games. It's risky to install those games on the phone because it may also compromise the other crypto wallets.
Gaming companies will need to adapt to the new trends otherwise they will be left behind. Sony has to also evolve, and probably create thier blockchain games as well. If DOTA will be on the blockchain, I guess they will need tokens too.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/games-for-a-living/
Jump to: