In a crisis Bitcoin becomes a good alternative to fiat. When banks start going bankrupt again Bitcoin usage those countries will increase massively. Bitcoin atms and Bitcoin Paying technology will rapidly spread out, and once the infrastructure is in place people will continue using it after a crisis is over.
Bank turning to bankruptcy is not the ways banks are today. That kind of bank is really a crap. There are lots of banks per country who really established a good and stable financial institution. In the first place why choose a bank that doesn't stand for really a long time.
A lot of the good and stable financial institution banks went bankrupt during the last recession and had to be bailed out by governments. Since then the governments changed the rules of what a bank could do if it went bankrupt. From now on banks are allowed to bail themselves out with customer's money. They call the new system a bail in.
Can you show here if the numbers or stats really that interesting to be preferred that bank turning to a bankrupt really always on hand today? We will proceed if you show some good numbers.
The new rules for EU banks say no bankrupt bank can have any government bail out money until it has paid 8% of its debts with customer's money. Between October 2008 and 2012 the EU paid out 592 billion euros to bail out bankrupt banks. The EU decided it couldn't afford to do that again, and to force banks to bail themselves out with customer's money in the future.
http://blogs.reuters.com/hugo-dixon/2016/01/04/eu-enters-brave-new-world-of-bank-bail-ins/The European Union entered a brave new world of bank “bail-ins” at the start of 2016. Europe has wasted so much taxpayers’ money on bailing out bust banks in recent years that it is right to try to get investors to help foot the bills in future. However, the tough new regime carries big political risks.
The key new rule is that no bank can be bailed out with public money until creditors accounting for at least 8 percent of the lender’s liabilities have stumped up. So-called bail-ins typically mean wiping out creditors’ investments, slashing their value or converting them into shares in the bank. Uninsured depositors could get caught along with professional investors.
Moreover, within the euro zone, national authorities will no longer be responsible for dealing with bust banks as this job has just been transferred to the new Single Resolution Mechanism.
During the global financial crisis, bailouts were the normal way of shoring up bust banks. The European Commission approved 592 billion euros of state aid to lenders between October 2008 and the end of 2012. This was justified on the grounds that if banks collapsed and depositors lost their money there would be economic chaos.
Thanks. Interesting article.
In general it's only applied
to a certain region and not as a whole.
Based on that, some of EU banks suffers a serious problem. The root of it hasn't been established nor presented by publicity.
Let's go back now in my post:
Bank turning to bankruptcy is not the ways banks are today. That kind of bank is really a crap. There are lots of banks per country who really established a good and stable financial institution. In the first place why choose a bank that doesn't stand for really a long time.
In this Im talking as a whole. It won't affect other banks as well in other countries since based on my understanding, it was linked to region's economical status. The said news is about "self" problems in that region alone.
But interesting news there.