Topic: The Kardashian Theory (Read 264 times)

They just mean "not the center of the national / state bank cartel". Even the site will somewhat function as a central control point

what if i told you the BCH social drama around the branding was a massive ruse/rverse psychology to make people want to hand the whole bitcoin branding over to theymos and the core team(thus barry silbert with ownership stakes of pretty much both side wins no matter what)

EG
kylie jenner vs kloe kardashian.. both fight over who is a real kardashian.. purely so that the family(caitlin) legally get to own the brand "kardashian" rather than keep the nam open for any family of 7 billion people to use

seems the topic creator found my theory.
but first lets address kakmakr's rply.

firstly LN is not a solution for BTC. its a separate commercial network that many/anycoin will use. so its again ill say it for emphasis. not a solution purely for BTC to 'make BTC great agan'
secondly even the core dev's are screaming that BTC cant scale. .. although its only failing at scaling onchain due to the restrictions those same devs have implemented,
you have to wonder when the devs in control of bitcoins blockchain protocol rules start saying the blockchain protocol is dead and the only future is non-blockchain managed vaults(ln channels)...
even you kakmakr are saying blockchain is dead/btc is dead. long live LN managed channels)
analogy: gold trading is dead long live unaudited paper money

thirdly. the topic creator found my theory and is asking the question. what if ver and theymos (the mouth pieces) are 2 sides of the same family. pretending to open up 2 different fan bases but both in the end, in the background are not rivals but paid by the same investors and following a single agenda of fake choice and the illusion of free choice.

just follow the money https://dcg.co/portfolio/#b
the drama of august 1st was a 3 shell game trying to look like people got 3 choices.
segwit UASF (luke JR, samson mow, bobby lee, petertodd, etc)  - businesses BTCC, blockstream
segwitx2 (jgarzig, gavin A) - businesses bitpay, bloq
bch (ver) - businesses blockchain

imagine barry silbert(DCG.co) is the parent caitlin jenner. and segwit(core) bch(cash) are the children (kylie and kloe)

real funny part is that ver is not even a programmer. so all the social drama of bch being vers network is hilarious.
to me all the finger pointing is social drama. not technical stuff..
ver owning bch is like saying theymos owns core.. (both are the social media faces of the sides of the coin pretending to being the opposite sides/ separate choice)
adamback is like craig wright. both shouting the "i had involvement in inventing the invention known as bitcoin, but i didnt code anything in 2009+"
adam back and craig also both love the social drama of saying they both love patents and investor money grabs.

its the same drama of both sides to keep people occupied in social drama's to distract people away from seeing the code changes are all being controlled into one single commercial roadmap end destination

I took Bitcoin cash as a coin that wanted to take over the popularity of bitcoin and make a profit on it. So you can't take her seriously, at least not now.

I think there are two different types of coins. it will be not acceptable

The end result is the same, because you are turning fiat cash into Crypto currencies. The problem is in the way that this is done and what the long-term impact of this is going to be. The original Bitcoin <> have been building a technology that would sustain large scale adoption, with the introduction of the second layer solutions.

Bitcoin Cash is not sustainable, because increasing "Block" sizes have limitations. So Roger Ver is not supporting a technology that will last for long. In my opinion, they do not care about this, because they have short term plans for it. Hype the technology --> Sell Free coins at the highest price --> move to next fork or Alt coin> 

I think bitcoin and bitcoin cash represent two different philosophies about how bitcoin ought to scale. Bitcoin represents off-chain scaling whereas bitcoin cash represents on-chain scaling. Ultimately they are very similar, and possibly bitcoin cash will eventually implement off-chain scaling as well.

This is a weird theory. bitcoin is a centralized currency. i do not accept this theory.

No.They too are not of the same coin.Bitcoin has been created by Satoshi to free people from the hands of bankers who loot their hard earned money in the form of transaction fee.

But Bcash is just a fork of bitcoin mainly created due to the greediness of the Bitcoin Antichrist Roger Ver who once was termed as bitcoin Jesus.

once upon a time there was this new thing created called bitcoin. it was a currency and people started adopting it so its price went up. at first others were laughing at it. then it started gaining more momentum and everyone saw that there is power in that decentralized currency system so the same people who were laughing at it started craving that power and wanted to control it. so they started their slow creep in. they have infiltrated everywhere, started wearing their sheep skin while being a wolf underneath.
they tried gaining control of bitcoin, they failed, they tried again, they were pushed back, they tried again and again and failed each time so they created their own version of bitcoin by copying the original bitcoin and calling it bitcoin-cash. again they saw their failure as nobody paid their creation any heed more than trading it on exchanges and enjoying its pump and dumps. so they started attacking bitcoin again and trying to show bitcoin is not bitcoin by calling it a different name: bitcoin-core, bitcoin-segwit,... two-side-of-same-coin,... and they have been failing still.

Actually, bitcoin is not the kind of money that divides it by region and size, which is why it is ironic that the bitcoin fame

The things is BrewMaster.... Bitcoin Cash IS what you are claiming to want. I'm not a bitcoin cash loyalist by any means, but also not a Bitcoin core loyalist either. I really feel like Bitcoin core has gone the route of centralization and is slowly being incorporated by Blockstream. Also, the BTC coin is utterly unusable, which is why I stopped using it. Isn't crypto supposed to be used? At least that's what I thought when I first got into crypto. I bought my first bitcoin to make a transaction on the internet... and started USING it more and more like money. Then about the time of the hard fork for BTC/BCH, the fees and times to transfer/purchase using BTC become to difficult to handle. The fees were out of control.... the time to transfer 1 BTC to another wallet would last over a day sometimes. I decided that it wasn't worth it to use BTC anymore... as many others did.

Now, I use BCH to make transactions. The last transaction I made was yesterday from one wallet to another. You know how long it took? It took less than 5 seconds to complete the transfer. It was unbelievable. I was extremely impressed and have not looked back since. Once you actually USE bitcoin cash, you will VERY VERY quickly see why and how it is superior to BTC.

Now, combining BCH with Openbazaar, themoneybutton, decentralized exchanges, atomic swaps and decentralized internet.... now this is something that WILL completely change the world. It will change society. It will disrupt society.  It will eradicate central banking, governments (in their current forms), and the monetary system as a whole.

If you do not see this and how this will happen, you need to wake up. I may make a step by step playbook on how this may play out. Lot of paths it can take, but it is undeniable that it will completely change society.

Those who use 'new' system I describe above will not only enable, but will empower everyday people like you and I to simply opt-out of the current system and status quo. Think about that for a moment....

...keep thinking.

If you have come to the same conclusion I have, congratulations. The world is about to change in a very very big and measurable way.

no!

there are a lot of weird theories out there and mostly they exist to undermine bitcoin and bring it down to their own centralized level.
i do believe that you are wrong about bitcoin and if some day i find out that i was wrong i will sell my bitcoins and move on because i am involved in bitcoin only as long as it has certain attributes and most important one is the decentralization which is why i stay away from certain altcoins such as bitcoin-cash.

What a weird analogy LOL.

Well, both coins are rivals, and they do have one common goal: global adoption. About the part with people being sheep though, both coins are consensus based, so no high authority has total control over the coins(though BCH is far more centralized compared to BTC).

Kardashians?

I don't know anything about Kardashian but I know Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin, which means that they share the same blockchain before block #478559 which happened August 1, 2017. At that time Bitcoin Cash proposed to increase the block size limit in order to solve the scalability issue and Bitcoin proposed SegWit (Segregated Witnesses). Of course not everyone agreed on the same thing, some believed in increasing the block size limit and some believed in SegWit and thus creating a fork and splitting the network in two which is Bitcoin(which retained its original name) and Bitcoin Cash(which used another name to differentiate it from the original Bitcoin).

Is Bruce/Caitlyn Enima (ENG)? 

Haha does not seem like that. Analyzing Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash with Kim's kadharsian is something funny. Kim himself is full of controversy to make himself famous. I think Bitcoin is not like that.

Please do elaborate.... I can see this in some ways. Even websites will somewhat act as a central point of control.... e.g. you build a cryptocurrency but they only way the public can use/redeem it is through the website you create and control. So a decentralized crypto becomes central b/c the only way it has utility is via a controlled website.

like this?

ohm jes and no

bitcoin and bitcoin cash, come from the same core and they are indeed pseudodecentral.

the world "decentral" that is used for marketing is just a marketing slogan, decentral currencies arent really possible.

they mean only "not central of the national/state banking cartel"

people over time will realise this.

regards