Topic: The Kracken! - page 18. (Read 31107 times)

You mean, the poll watchers who were told to leave (as was reported on TV 11-3 live) were not told to leave? I'm most certainly glad that my facts have been corrected.

Perhaps you should actually read what Georgia's SOS office had to say about this event before jumping on the conspiratardery train. For example, nobody asked the poll watchers to leave. If they left on their own that doesn't prevent the counting from continuing, for obvious reasons.

They hid the doughnuts in the black suitcases so they could eat them all at 3am?

I'm actually interested in any evidence and would give it a shot. Where is it?


I've read affidavits of alleged voter fraud, which doesn't serve as proof. But even then, the affidavits themselves don't contain enough voter fraud to overturn entire states if the allegations ended up being true.

The Trump team isn't even going for voter fraud in their legal battles. Seems like they're just trying to get mail in ballots thrown out. Don't blame them, mail in voting is nonsense.

Edit: Instead of posting a useless screen shot, I looked into the story: https://www.cbs46.com/news/lawmakers-hear-bombshell-allegations-of-georgia-election-fraud/article_8404e930-35e5-11eb-8ac3-1fc96e3b52d8.html

This is interesting to say the least and if this ends up being true, this is in fact election fraud and a bomb shell. Video seems to show some poll workers ushering out people then taking out suitcases of ballots under a table and resume counting.

Regardless of whether those ballots are valid or not, there is no excuse for not having any poll watchers present. This is in fact evidence of fraud. The source I posted above had one senator questioning whether the footage was valid which is probably a bad sign for democrats because you can't CGI your way into faking CCTV security footage of an event that took place.

I'm looking forward to more info here because this is shady as fuck, and *if* it turns out the video is how it seems, then this is concrete evidence of fraud that legitimizes Trump's effort to contest the results.

There is probably something happening behind the scenes we don't know it yet.


I don't remember twitter putting those warnings back in 2016 when people accused Trump of getting aid from Russia. Yes Twitter is pushing its own agenda (the dem agenda) and censoring the president of the United States and Jack will have to answer for this behavior.

Trump may or may not spreading misinformation. Twitter is not the one to decide which is which. Courts are. Did Trump concede and left the House? No. Then Twitter can't decide the result of an ongoing legal process the way they see fit.

If that's evidence of something other than election workers putting ballots into (or taking out of) a bag in the room where you count all the ballots then I'm sure the feds already have a search warrant and those 4 workers are in federal custody and we'll know soon who was behind this scheme that almost robbed Trump of a second term.




There is no question, the president is using twitter to spread misinformation that's making millions of people more angry and more violent.  And you think it's the guy who built Twitter that's the shady one?

More hilarious kraken...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqXtiQ20BLw

gotta love the look on the Jenna's face after Rudy makes a tooty. bet it smells fruity....odor in the court!   lol

Repubs: Provide many evidence.
Dems: Yeah I see you provided hundreds of thousands of evidence for the election fraud but where is the evidence?

 

Comedy gold. This can only end in one way.

I also find it very shady of Jack to put banners on these tweets even when they are presenting the actual evidences. I guess he'll get his fair share from his too.

Trump (and thus spendulus) is going on about ballots in a suitcase, this is the video he's talking about:

https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1334569329334083586?s=20

incredible stuff

The Kraken says...

Black suitcases.

Do you know how to scroll?
It’s called a Twitter thread. Works fine on my device.

Here ya go this might work better...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdFQIGUg_Qc

Comments are hilarious

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-georgia-runoff-boycott_n_5fc811cac5b6933ec7dc2e05

Sidney Powell is saying Republicans should boycott the Georgia senate elections.

This person is a grifter and I now consider anyone that continues to believe a word she says dumber than a sack of rocks. This undoubtedly proves she is full of shit.

Huh? You are posting a SNL skit, no more. What are you talking about?

Here’s Trump’s star witness at Michigan hearing or whatever that particular farce is.
Yeah you know she’s a batshit crazy drunk when even Rudy is trying to rein her in.
Some serious Kraken there...lmao
https://twitter.com/search?q=carone%20snl&src=typed_query

Just the name Kracken reminds me of Neil Diamond - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhumCu3fzMI.

Perhaps. But all those who manufactured the Steal can claim they were victims of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

It's true that everything is hearsay without proof. But you would think that the Dems and the Govs of the various States would want their voting machine counts done by independent agents in addition to themselves and their opponents. Why not find out the truth? Are they afraid that if their is evidence of fraud, that they will be blamed? So, they won't let the voting machines be openly examined, to hide their potential weakness in not discovering the fraud.

Sounds more like they want cover up that the voting is fraudulent, and finding out that Trump is really the winner.

We will know about the Kracken when marshal law starts happening, or when the Dems and Biden concede.

Unless you can prove the poll wasn't rigged by the easter bunny it shouldn't count.

I would have to agree, it is the most important speech Trump has made.

And we know what he says about the fraud is true. In the poll here on this forum, 20% of the responses were people admitting they would cheat to steal an election, if it got Trump out.

This is more of what I was going with.

Not being covered by anyone else is fine, I mean there's been a lot of stories broken by news companies that weren't being covered by others at first. Think about stories like the Boston Globe and the Catholic Church, or the NY Times (?) and the Pentagon Papers. These weren't covered by others initially.

But yes, in the case of the stories you're talking about there is NO credibility and literally just conspiracy theories that people are trying to sell as fact.