Re: The latest Alt wars are over. We have our winner, DGC !
ha ha ha ha !
you kids.
Topic: The latest Alt wars are over. We have our winner, DGC ! - page 2. (Read 3874 times)
Is there a thread that lists the accomplishments of each alternate coin?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/list-of-all-cryptocoins-134179
try that one
Is there a thread that lists the accomplishments of each alternate coin?
It is essentially public record that PXC had 20,000 blocks premined. It was the first topic of discussion in the PXC introduction thread. The developer did not dispute it.
I wish that coin the best of luck for whatever limited utility it has on that poker site but let's not pretend it is mainstream enough to warrant consideration as a top coin
I wish that coin the best of luck for whatever limited utility it has on that poker site but let's not pretend it is mainstream enough to warrant consideration as a top coin
...developers have premature arthritis in the right index finger from hitting the "SELL" button on Cryptsy
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
I'll go out on a limb and say you have absolutely no evidence to support this assertion, and you're only purpose in making it is an immature attempt at libeling a coin you don't own and its developers.
PXC doesn't hurt your DGC. PXC can complement it, just as PXC complemented WDC by adding it to its automatic escrow service.
Further, you don't help DGC by making such outlandish statements. You possibly even hurt the reputation of the coin. If people start to believe that only hardline nutjobs believe in a particular thing then that particular thing starts to lose credibility. For example look at gold. Ever heard of "gold bugs"? This negative connotation oftentimes keeps serious investors away for fear of being seen as believing in something that only whack-a-doodles believe in.
Oh right, yes, the developer needed TWENTY THOUSAND blocks x 50 coins per block premined to fund free rolls and giveaways on his, presumably raked, poker site.
Why just rake your users when, at the same time, you can sucker them into using a coin that was massively diluted from day one
Wdc needed there preminne for what?
The tables are rake free, and the only diluted thing around here is you..you just crack something down without knowing what.
Normaly dont react on such a wanker like you. couldnt resist
Happy crashing for you...and your fake house lmao
...developers have premature arthritis in the right index finger from hitting the "SELL" button on Cryptsy
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
I'll go out on a limb and say you have absolutely no evidence to support this assertion, and you're only purpose in making it is an immature attempt at libeling a coin you don't own and its developers.
PXC doesn't hurt your DGC. PXC can complement it, just as PXC complemented WDC by adding it to its automatic escrow service.
Further, you don't help DGC by making such outlandish statements. You possibly even hurt the reputation of the coin. If people start to believe that only hardline nutjobs believe in a particular thing then that particular thing starts to lose credibility. For example look at gold. Ever heard of "gold bugs"? This negative connotation oftentimes keeps serious investors away for fear of being seen as believing in something that only whack-a-doodles believe in.
Oh right, yes, the developer needed TWENTY THOUSAND blocks x 50 coins per block premined to fund free rolls and giveaways on his, presumably raked, poker site.
Why just rake your users when, at the same time, you can sucker them into using a coin that was massively diluted from day one
No further comment is necessary. It was my mistake to attempt to engage in a constructive conversation with the OP of this thread.
PXC? DGC?? you got to be kidding. Look at their hashrates! The only one having consistent interests and big hashrate is WDC, there's not even another one close to it (except BTC and LTC of course).
PXC, DGC, NBL, LKY, PWC, etc etc are fall to the same category, which is either mine and dump, or with vulnerable support by one or two people at low price, all be dumped without mercy.
PXC, DGC, NBL, LKY, PWC, etc etc are fall to the same category, which is either mine and dump, or with vulnerable support by one or two people at low price, all be dumped without mercy.
OVER WTF?
I0coin is back in the house, this ain't over!
~BCX~
Really? By Hazard? Is it a joke?
...developers have premature arthritis in the right index finger from hitting the "SELL" button on Cryptsy
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
I'll go out on a limb and say you have absolutely no evidence to support this assertion, and you're only purpose in making it is an immature attempt at libeling a coin you don't own and its developers.
PXC doesn't hurt your DGC. PXC can complement it, just as PXC complemented WDC by adding it to its automatic escrow service.
Further, you don't help DGC by making such outlandish statements. You possibly even hurt the reputation of the coin. If people start to believe that only hardline nutjobs believe in a particular thing then that particular thing starts to lose credibility. For example look at gold. Ever heard of "gold bugs"? This negative connotation oftentimes keeps serious investors away for fear of being seen as believing in something that only whack-a-doodles believe in.
Oh right, yes, the developer needed TWENTY THOUSAND blocks x 50 coins per block premined to fund free rolls and giveaways on his, presumably raked, poker site.
Why just rake your users when, at the same time, you can sucker them into using a coin that was massively diluted from day one
PXC? DGC?? you got to be kidding. Look at their hashrates! The only one having consistent interests and big hashrate is WDC, there's not even another one close to it (except BTC and LTC of course).
PXC, DGC, NBL, LKY, PWC, etc etc are fall to the same category, which is either mine and dump, or with vulnerable support by one or two people at low price, all be dumped without mercy.
PXC, DGC, NBL, LKY, PWC, etc etc are fall to the same category, which is either mine and dump, or with vulnerable support by one or two people at low price, all be dumped without mercy.
...developers have premature arthritis in the right index finger from hitting the "SELL" button on Cryptsy
This is exactly what I'm talking about.
I'll go out on a limb and say you have absolutely no evidence to support this assertion, and you're only purpose in making it is an immature attempt at libeling a coin you don't own and its developers.
PXC doesn't hurt your DGC. PXC can complement it, just as PXC complemented WDC by adding it to its automatic escrow service.
Further, you don't help DGC by making such outlandish statements. You possibly even hurt the reputation of the coin. If people start to believe that only hardline nutjobs believe in a particular thing then that particular thing starts to lose credibility. For example look at gold. Ever heard of "gold bugs"? This negative connotation oftentimes keeps serious investors away for fear of being seen as believing in something that only whack-a-doodles believe in.
Why do we have to argue? Can we not all agree that right now the only "new" altcoins with a possible future are WDC, DGC, and PXC?
None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
PXC is not a winner. 1,000,000 coin premine & developers have premature arthritis in the right index finger from hitting the "SELL" button on Cryptsy
Why do we have to argue? Can we not all agree that right now the only "new" altcoins with a possible future are WDC, DGC, and PXC?
None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
This is a pretty good statement None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
The war is not over not to even begin to start with.
Why do we have to argue? Can we not all agree that right now the only "new" altcoins with a possible future are WDC, DGC, and PXC?
None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
None of these three coins are where they need to be yet, but with solid development and support they could be. There's no reason to tear each other down or try to say that "X currency is better than Y".
To say any of these three coins is the "winner" at this point, is not only inflammatory and stupid, it's also counterproductive.
the only winner is WDC
That's actually pretty hilarious. I should send him some coins!
in cap and current exchange price
Also,
(25 * 200) / (17 * 256) is pretty close to 1..
I'll do that math
DGC is only worth ~15% more than WDC at the moment, considering amount of coins and current exchange prices
in cap and current exchange price
Also,
(..) And yet DGC is almost twice as much in value....
(25 * 200) / (17 * 256) is pretty close to 1..
I'll do that math
DGC is only worth ~15% more than WDC at the moment, considering amount of coins and current exchange prices 
LOL @ op.
What has DGC accomplished? Nothing really.
What has DGC accomplished? Nothing really.
sorry to say but dgc is still losing to Worldcoin by a lot..... I am seeing very minimal growth in dgc, wdc on the otherhand seems to have taken off... Just check the buy orders for both on all exchanges (all 1 exchange for dgc)
WDC has flatlined...
Viva DGC!
Jump to: