Topic: The Lost Coins (Read 2112 times)

I'd rather start hoarding bitcoins till it reaches $100K per 1btc. 

What if someone tries to hide/hoard  bitcoins till price goes high. Then use bitcoins when it reached 1btc=$100K? 

Go home if your using a fake word to describe (incorrectly) how well you comprehend bitcoins
I want to Punch you for saying muggle.

I prefer to call them Millies, Mikes, Nancys, and Pedos Pedros 

Do you mean that milli, micro, nano and pico are all very well established and obvious but the satoshi is just a generally accepted unit but is not officially recognized?

None of these names have been established yet.

The maximum number of Bitcoins is 21,000,000 and it can currently be divided down to one satoshi which is 0.00000001 BTC (10 nanoBTC) so there is a total of 2,100,000,000,000,000 satoshis or 0x775F05A074000 satoshis.  This does not fill out a 64 bit number yet.  So we have a ways to go, in terms of smaller units, before we overflow a 64 bit number.  In fact a 64 bit number can handle the number 0x1D24B2DFAC520000 which is 2,100,000,000,000,000,000

The current smallest unit is 1 satoshi = 10 nanoBTC

With some changes the protocol can handle down to 0.001 satoshi = 10 picoBTC

So there is a limit but I don't think there is an issue for a very long time.
               

 

I understand how it works with gold, but with a digital currency, there is one thing I'm trying to get my head around.

With gold, eventually it becomes physically impossible to divide any smaller.

With Bitcoins not being physical, you have that "infinitely divisible" aspect going on, which has never been taken to the extreme to see what would happen.  6.0221 × 10^-23 btc is just as easy to divide and send as 1 btc.   I guess it would work better than gold.

This scares me, even if it's not my money, etc. Noobs should always know that transactions are irreversible and if you lose the wallet.dat, those coins are gone forever. If you did that, there's some chance of recovering the wallet.dat if you avoid doing anything else in that computer: shut it down now and ask here for some help from another computer.

This all correct, knowing the receiving address alone doesnt help you, you need the private key which is in that file (wallet.dat). So if you lose your wallet.dat file you lose your bitcoins.  So make sure to keep a couple backups of it from here on out.

Are the coins still in your tradehill account or did you send them out?

If sent out where did you send them?  Give me the public key address you sent them to.

Next, assuming you sent them to a public key address - where did you get that address?

Do not use either computer for anything until you answer these questions.

you need the wallet.dat from your netbook
should be in
c:\users\name\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin
The address is a hash of a public key. the "password" - private key is in that file

I destroyed a few satoshi just the other day when I sent some BTC to the following public addresses:


Pretty cool eh?

It is the last transaction in this block:

http://blockexplorer.com/block/0000000000000e33f1a48cd77260c0d90cf9aeaac74e85a546c2629da956a2f3

I like to think of it as mars dust. Lets say I have the entire 200 gram supply of  mars dust. If i drop a few grams in the ocean, it raises the value of my remaining dust.
There may come a day when people say "You own a whole Bitcoin?" 

21 million is just an arbitrary number, no need to stress over a few in the hole. 

I always thought of Bitcoins as being inflation proof, but "infinitely divisible" makes me have to rethink this.  Its easy to see the deflationary value of the system...but that word "unlimited"...how will that play out?

It doesn't matter if they are lost forever, because the price of the current bitcoins will be higher. That's all.

From my understanding, you use to be able to send coins straight to a public key¹ (note: not a bitcoin address we all use today). The problem being that if you miss typed the key the coins are effectively lost, for it is near impossible to generate the private key from the public key. This is why the bitcoin addresses used today are in fact a hash of the public key with a checksum, so that miss types can be caught before the coins are sent. This causes each transaction to do the same hash on the public key(provided on the next spending of the coins) to check that the public key matches the address the coins were sent to (you can't go from address to public key, I think....).


Cannot be remined. They will be "lost" until someone finds a private key that generates the public key the coins where sent to.

As people have said, only about 21M bitcoins will be mined in total. I assume that if a majority of the miners agree to change the protocol this could be changed, but don't quote me on it. IE instead of dropping down to 25 coins per block mined at the 210,000(?) block mark just continue giving 50 coins. The odds of this happen are rather slim, for one of the founding principles of bitcoin is the fair playing field.  Of which knowing how many coins can be generated from the start is one of the key facts that make bitcoin a fair playing field (instead of having a central bank that can keep printing money indefinably for example).


I'm no economist, but if the supply goes down (from lost coins mentioned above) it stands to reason that the value of each coin goes up. By how much I have no idea. Another thing to consider: 50 new coins are minted about every 10 minutes, so currently, any "lost" coins in the supply can be replaced fairly quickly if the number of coins lost isn't a significantly higher magnitude above 50 (for example 1000 coins lost would take about 200 minutes to replace).


Sounds like a bad idea to me, how do you tell the difference between lost coins and coins in "cold storage" (for example bitcoins used for physical coins). What would prevent people from spending the coins that are thought to be lost after they are "added" back into the unmined pool? This would have the opportunity to increase the supply of coins past the 21M mark which would be bad for the reason given above. But hey, I'm just a noob ^^.

1: This is an assumption based on looking at early translations in the first 200 blocks or so. I only learned about bitcoin a couple months ago.

There is talk of a possible modification to bitcoin called demurrage that can bring back lost bitcoins by requiring all bitcoin to be moved within a period of time or become once again returned to the pool of unmined bitcoin blocks.

When they say some bitcoins are lost, is there a chance that all these coins be all gone?