Topic: THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN CRYPTO (Read 520 times)

Some people have more power, hence, more danger levels to them. If I use your logic, I would say that I may have a dangerous role in this space but it's incomparable with someone as powerful as Jihan. And its not just about one or two mistakes that could crash the market. I mean it's not just the quantity but the quality aspect of it like if it's a really bad mistake such choosing to promote a more centralized version of Bitcoin which is Bitcoin Cash. Jihan loves Bitcoin Cash yet his company mines the most Bitcoins.

That scenario is only possible if quantum computing can only be accessed by bad guys and not the good guys. But that is very unlikely. The most advanced super quantum computers are likely being developed at MIT by college professors. And it is being closely supervised. Honestly, they are not very far in their development. Quantum Mechanics is so weird that manipulating it is difficult. It is the fabric of reality after all.

If the quantum computing can threaten today banking security, I’m very positive we will be in a world of chaos, because every address and every crypto will be moved every second, there will be no way to keep anything safe in a wallet. May be we will have movable wallet in the future, who know?

in my opinion, actually everyone in this virtual world has a fairly cruel nature, especially in cryptocurrency, they certainly have greed in themselves. If we think the market crashes only because of one or two mistakes then we must learn again that trading in the market is not only those two people, we all have dangerous roles in crypto

Quantum computing is not a threat because the technology is not even there yet. Besides, future quantum computing security can also be used to combat future quantum computing hacking. That probably won't come for another 10-20 years. Perhaps more.

I think my wife can be more dangerous than him anytime, jk. I was expecting of some really smart hackers who can finally destroy crypto, some quantum bullshit etc.

What do you mean doesn't look dangerous? Like literally? He's a nice-looking Asian but he does pose a threat.

I’m fascinated by the title of the video, the most dangerous man in crypto who doesn’t look like dangerous at all. Of course this is how they get a lot of views, if they point the blame to some really dangerous man it wouldn’t caught anyone attention.

There is also the concern that either the Chinese government will strong-arm Bitmain and Jihan or collude with them to disrupt Bitcoin. As a nation, China has a negative stance on cryptocurrencies overall.

What is the purpose of this video? To spread unneeded fear of Jihan? He's not dangerous to Bitcoin. As most Chinese he wanted to start his own business and found a niche market that later exploded. How is he different from early computer industry entrepreneurs like Gates or Jobs?

It is right! We need to talk about the problems and dangers that cryptocurrency carries.

This will help the community make the right decisions and develop in the right direction.

Jihan the co founder of Bitmain have founded a company that mines bitcoin.Any company will have its competetion and to make it stay on top the founder would create something that the company would profit more.What makes it wrong is that if the mining company will do something to make the other competitors to go down,or bankrupt..because of greed.

I didn't note where he is a danger to bitcoin, other than he secretly test mining programs. If he is only testing, secretly, then it is not a big deal because we don't know how many people out there that are more culprits.

He has the right to argue against a proposition that he thinks is not good enough from his viewpoint. That does not pitch him as a dangerous person. Well, it is good to acknowledge the dangers you have enomerated.

You watch Mr Robot don't you?

It seems to me that the most terrible person in cryptocurrency is Satoshi Nakamoto. He has 1 million Bitcoins.

looks like some social drama
..
funny part is he doesnt write code that changes the network.
if he had power segwit wouldnt have got activated
if he was an attacker the network would be dead.

all this "china", "Wu", "ver", "wright" stuff is social drama.. like a kardashian tv show.
sticking fingers up to a webcam. being a australian scammer. does not affect bitcoin.
plus

these screamers about 51% attack must realise that ASICS have been around for 4 years. and yet all that has happened is social drama finger pointing games
however those that do have power are the devs, the VC's that pay the devs. and the same VC's that have bought the main merchant/exchanges that then sway users to follow dev/merchant/exchanges because without them people cant spend funds through that cabal/cartel

i do like it when people scream "china own 51%". yet if you investigate the numbers you will see many of the "china" farms are not actually in asia nor in control/managed by one person

oh well
lets let the sheep do the standard fox news "bomb them bomb them bomb them" screams of racism, while completely ignoring where the real power lays.

mining pools cant change the rules. as any rules that defy what CODE THE DEVS RELEASE gets rejected. yep a mining pool can have 500zetahash and still get rejected in 2 seconds.
all a pool can do is change the arrangement of transactions in a block

funny thing. antshares and bitcoin cash are separate. they are not viruses that can attack the network. the only thing that is happening is finger pointing and social distractions away from where the real CODE manipulation source can happen.

All hackers are dangerous to our society, because they lose a lot of money, fall into debt

Yup, and also the repercussions of his methods. Nevertheless, I will not judge him as a bad person. Just another soul getting by. Everything has consequences though.

Yeah of course it has to be a hacker to do the job technically but not all hackers are a threat. The beauty about decentralized blockchain is that you have to spend computing power (proof of work) to be able to launch an effective attack. So it doesn't matter how good of a hacker you are if you don't have that much computing power you couldn't steal shit except for centralized exchanges coz you know how it goes.

Bitmain has the hashpower (almost) and the technical skills. I'm not saying they are gonna do something bad. I'm saying they can't be overlooked judging from Jihan's behaviour in the past. You all know how that hard fork happened. Or maybe not?

For me every hacker are dangerous to the society of cryptocurrencies and also for those people who are greedy and doesn't know how to use crypto properly.