Topic: The most liquid companies in the gambling industry - page 10. (Read 2261 times)

Honestly, I'm not familiar with the company names, although as you have shared, they are the most liquid. We are in the crypto world, so I believe it's more appropriate if you can share the most liquid crypto gambling sites, not the general ones, as most likely, they are dominated by fiat casinos.

Maybe we should take it from the general approach and perspective, are the gambling platforms having enough liquidity not failing along the way, are they not been attacked, are there bot scam related cases associated with them, it's not about having money alone, it takes an effective management and plans to ensure that what you're spending money on is really showing and worth receiving your steady funds, if not, when the strike arrives and they got hacked, everything about them went down altogether, so in this, if you have enough liquidity to maintain a functioning gambling casino, then try as much as possible to be experienced in this field and maintain a professional and standard security measures no matter how it could cost, this will ensure all you've vested efforts on not to go waste.

Basically a company can be quite good if things in terms of liquidity were only limited to the financial part, because the financial part is what everyone associates with liquidity , if I use the casino Betgfury as an example, because they have a gold mine there, they do nothing but that , so having a gold mine and not taking advantage of it is like having a treasure in the wrong hands, they are in a market where they have not done so badly , as to think that things can go wrong Control, yes, the Bitcoin market is Somewhat low, but what? They have to Concentrate on giving fluids to that token, through contests, through many things to be able to encourage people to Buy it , I don't know why now with such great support a project like a casino doesn't take advantage. things are the way they are and they are letting it die little by little, I love the passive crypto program, just to have the tokens in Hodl mode, but it is not enough, there are other ways to attract people to Buy the tokens I think it's Great.

When I entered this world of crypto I have always been fascinated by everything that has to do with the main things they offer, when they talk to me about tokens, what I see is a lot of money in the market and that they can do things that cause a mistake, As long as things exist, there will or will be a way to emerge, but you have to work on it, you have to be able to do it where you can, then stay stagnant and depend only on others to make decisions, because it's something that doesn't seem good to me, How many people don't want to have the development that Betfury has had just with its tokens? How much money can they not get out of it? e smuchs, but put it in a centralized exchange because it is or will give it life, I have seen how some tokens go to the ground for not putting it in the corresponding exchanges, so the inclusion of a good exchange would give more liquidity to the Token , casino , you would have a Complete Company with Income all the Time.

Your interpretation of the term "liquid" in the context of casinos is fascinating. Your perspective goes beyond financial stability to include a casino's operational integrity and reputation. I completely agree with what you said. A casino's ability to promptly and transparently handle payments is important. It's discouraging to see casinos struggle in this area, especially when their failures can be attributable to their own poor planning or feature implementation. You bring up freebitco.in, which demonstrates a sensible approach to faucets that many others are unable to accomplish. I have noticed that casinos, like Betfury, often launch with grandiose features, but later give in to abuse and make hasty changes to their products. Stake.com, bitcasino.io, and duelbits have indeed set standards. It's not only about fancy user interfaces; it's about strength of character and a never-ending commitment to the satisfaction of the game's audience. Would any casino not put these qualities first? Well, from the beginning, they are doomed

Things can easily be confused with the word, for me the word Liquid in a casino, or in a company means that they are quite profitable, that they have a trustworthy company, that they can do things that others, no, that they have a wing reputation and that above all in these casinos there are always winners, that is what I see as liquid, where it does not have any type of problem, of course for some it can represent clarity and liquidity with a bank or something like that, however for me from the From the point of view, a casino that is full or complete is one that does not have any type of problem when it comes to meeting the payment of a player, that does not invent any type of excuse, that is the only thing I understand how a liquid casino, For me, things are quite strong when some problems arise that cannot be solved by a swan, in a thread I was talking about the vulnerablities of the casinos, and that in this part it is really stupid of them, because someone who programs a casino must know, take into consideration that things can be ugly when there is a type of abuse, but abuses in faucts, in multi-accounts, but this is partly the fault of the casino itself, because the casino is the one that allows these vulnerable things, I like give the example of fereebitco.in where they have their faucet still active, where users can make whatever accounts they want, what is necessary is to play, so they are not suffering from system abuse, or abuse of multi-accounts, or abuse of facutes, as they had Before, some casinos, I even dare to say Betfury, in its beginnings, put the faucet with less reward, but in a disproportionate way, so why does this happen? 'Because normally things in these casinos are not done well from the beginning.'

So for me basically a casino that is liquid or complete is stake.com, bitcasino.io, duelbits, among others, because they are casinos that have not presented draas where they say that they are vulnerable, that they have gone through some tough processes but that they are in front of everything.

I have only heard of a few of the company names, such as Draftkings, Las Vegas Sands, and MGM Resorts. But I don't know how the company is and how good the company is. Maybe it's because these companies are offline casino companies so I don't know much about each company. But I am sure that each company will want to expand its business to other countries, especially to countries that support gambling. I was only interested in investing in those companies but then, I thought that it would require a lot of money to become one of the shareholders. So I don't intend to continue because I don't have much money. I'd rather just be a bitcoin investor

Well, I'm not that of a gambler person myself or if I am I think I will may not be familiar on any of these companies as well. For me knowing that they are publicly liquid for the gamblers to know is saying that they are reputable but that's a two edge sword though because we will never know internally on how they really operate. I even see reputable casinos that end up gone without a trace.

It is really annoying and you'd do well to keep away from sites that start getting a reputation for KYCing customers to death when it comes to get their earnings back. It is just a cheap trick, since if there is actually any incompliance with the customer they cannot take the money in the first place. I wonder if there is any way of formally suing them or reporting to a regulator, since they have accepted money without asking questions first.

I do see the point, the casinos should ask for KYC records or say that if the KYC is Requested to be Able to withdraw the money , whether I am lazy or not, that is my problem, a casino cannot force me to do things that I never do It's easier for them to place a Notice than for them to get an unpleasant surprise, why? to get through the worst times? then to refuse to search for documents just to get the money? why don't they do it or say it before, that they say that they have to do the KYC if they want to withdraw the money, all the casinos now have that custom, because it doesn't hurt that one only does it or Says it, so that the clinetes so fast.

The link you provided is telling me different thing. There is no list of casinos in the link. And the companies you provided are not familiar, they are all new to me. Are you sure those casinos are working perfectly? Aside from the once you mentioned we have nice and reputable casinos in the forum which are reliable with without fear. But this your casinos are not really encouraging me to visit and another you would have not is to add the link of each casino for use to access it easily.

We can't tell maybe OP may decided to  include the ones on this forum or not because for someone like me, i hardly find any of his list familiar to me, maybe he can update later on, but to cap the whole thing with the summary, gambling platforms in general have enough liquids, it takes money to start one and also huge finances to maintain any, this is all a constant thing to do, thry also make their own money, but i think here we should be more focused on how reputable they are than how bouyant is their liquid to maintain a stay in operations.

I'd thought I'll see some crypto gambling projects or companies that are liquid in this post but sadly it's not. Well, I think it's good to know if a crypto gambling projects or companies will be listed here since we're more focus on that in this forum. Will gonna wait until that's done, I'd probably think Rollbit is one on the list.

I am sure that there are, and it would be better if this is the ones that the @OP have shared because we are indeed on a cryptocurrency forum. Cryptos are full of potential so yeah investors are also here.

Many crypto casinos are transparent because they are centralized, and that is why they are more successful than the decentralized ones. Being decentralized still has its own advantages. One of it provides full anonymity and there are still lots of people who prefer it so investors might also want to check them out. Why pick one only if they can be able to invest on both types of casinos? That should gave them a much better income.

I don't want to turn this into another thread about plagiarism and why it is immoral to use other people's content without crediting the original author. If you are a professional, you should already know this.

I would just like to point out Wikipedia's terms of use:

source: https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Policy:Terms_of_Use#7._Licensing_of_Content

Although you are right, the general rule on the Internet mandates to mention the sources you took the information from. That's common knowledge. But, in case you don't know the specific rules of this forum, not doing it can lead to a ban due to plagiarism, as joniboini said before.

We collect all publicly available information about 40 major companies in various industries, in this case, gambling. The link I provided leads to a calendar where we display all significant events related to these companies. Based on these metrics, we construct our financial index, which can fluctuate due to various events within the company
Wikipedia is a free and accessible source of information. It was created for people to use open information

Thanks, I fixed it

If by any means you couldn't delete the post you wanted to and you don't intend it to be read or contributed to like you made two same post, you can edit it and write (delete). This could enable mod to know you want it deleted. I think that will be better instead of leaving it as post because people may still post there. Or you lock that thread on off topic.

To lock the thread, click at the topic and scroll to the buttom left of your gadget and you see lock topic.

You are absolutely right! And I tried to delete 1 of the posts, but the forum won't let me do it. So I just left 2 identical posts in different sections. But today I was advised to change the subject and text of one of the posts if I can't delete them. Which I did

The index that you used doesn't seem to provide the list of companies that were tracked by it. Where did you get the list? Is it paywalled or did you use AI to guess them?

Some descriptions are definitely taken directly from Wikipedia with little to no changes. If anything, I'd argue that a plagiarism case can be made here.