These unpleasant restrictions in the form of mandatory KYC, prohibition to play via VPN and other unpleasant restrictions for the player often completely spoil the casino to which you are accustomed and which you have been using for a long time and in which you enjoyed playing. Unfortunately, in this case you have to part with such a casino and even in your soul keep the resentment and disappointment with the casino managers and the casino itself for the fact that they could not fully be on the side of the players' interests. It would be great if the management of some casinos somehow clearly understood such needs of customers as the stability of requirements for restrictions on the game and in no case aimed at tightening them even despite the requirements of various local regulators and other reasons. Only such casinos really command respect from customers and in the long term work long and effectively.
Yes, indeed it is, for example, customers who have been with the casino for a lifetime, who are longer with the casino, those types of people should have special treatment, I say something, in the future casinos will be very advanced with the best games but they will have the KYC restriction and that will be something that many will not like because people who have money do not like others to find out and it is logical, by giving a KYC they will know their funds, the amount they can play and if a government feels like wanting the players' data they will know immediately, and as is the case with most governments, they will want to take advantage through taxes and so on.
Well, of course, if we are talking about a really rich player and about big bets, then KYC immediately destroys any possibility of anonymous play of such a person. And the casino is most likely obliged to report the message about possible large winnings of this player to the local authorities authorized for taxation. However, here the question arises that this player, having once received a large win, most likely lost it all in the same casino, and this is almost always the case. And now he is presented with a demand to pay tax on winnings that no longer exist. And no matter how you look at it, this is an unjustified additional inconvenience for the player. By the way, this is what many players may be afraid of when they go through KYC and stop being anonymous players. I do not urge not to pay taxes, this is generally a crime, but it is also unclear how to calculate the tax in the case of multiple wins / losses. And in my opinion, it is still right to take the tax from the casino itself, and leave the players alone with this issue.